I am not going to play armchair quarterback for Dr. Bradford, but you do understand that Dr. Peterson had two important pieces prepared for the Review, in two successive years, that were scuttled by Bradford at short notice, right?
Yes, one of which was a lengthy and exhaustive critique of John Dehlin's I'm-here-to-help-you-out-of-the-Church project, something for which FARMS, and intellectually serious LDS apologetics was originally conceived to answer and respond to.
Why do you think an LDS scholar such as Gerald Bradford, a director of an institute originally, and at its core, dedicated to the intellectually rigorous and detailed criticism of precisely anti-Mormon arguments and criticisms of the Church of the very kind deployed by John Dehlin, would protect an apostate critic who openly provides intellectual ammunition and comfort to those moving away from the Church and into apostasy, and scuttle intellectually serious and researched criticism of, what is essentially, an openly hostile dissident LDS intellectual and advocate for apostasy from the Church as a legitimate pursuit?