
But will he really succeed in putting him into a pie, do you think?
Pahoran wrote:Your screenname is well chosen.
When have I written about "real missionaries?" To what do you refer?
I'm approaching the status you mentioned by dint of having almost one tenth as many posts here as I do on my home board.
I haven't posted here in months, and I am posting now only because, just in case you were too drunk to notice, this thread is about me. I realise that there is so little to talk about in this echo chamber that you have to obsessively talk about MD&DB participants behind our backs, but that doesn't mean we have no right of reply. Exactly how does that mean that I have "no morals to defend?"
Regards,
Pahoran
Doctor Scratch wrote:I have to admit, Pahoran, that's I'm still not entirely clear on the purpose of your "hints." Would you care to enlighten me? (Or is this the part when *I* am supposed to start dropping "hints"?)
Pahoran wrote:Doctor Scratch wrote:I have to admit, Pahoran, that's I'm still not entirely clear on the purpose of your "hints." Would you care to enlighten me? (Or is this the part when *I* am supposed to start dropping "hints"?)
You do whatever you like, Scratchy. I just wanted you to know.
Regards,
Pahoran
Doctor Scratch wrote:Well, I was trying to decide whether or not to tell you if you and your pals are correct, but as you've already noted--with noticeable conviction, I might add--it is "known." And since I'm all about creating a space for faith to flourish, I think it's best that I stay silent, so that you can press on, shoulder to the wheel, even in the face of doubt.
Pahoran wrote:Doctor Scratch wrote:Well, I was trying to decide whether or not to tell you if you and your pals are correct, but as you've already noted--with noticeable conviction, I might add--it is "known." And since I'm all about creating a space for faith to flourish, I think it's best that I stay silent, so that you can press on, shoulder to the wheel, even in the face of doubt.
Good for you, Scratch. You keep right on trying to brazen it out.
Regards,
Pahoran
Pahoran wrote:I search this thread in vain for examples of me doing that.
Pahoran wrote:Yes, the "sincerity" just oozes.
Pahoran wrote:So you keep saying.
Pahoran wrote:foolishly and naïvely taking you at your word that that was what you really wanted
Pahoran wrote:why not break down and admit that it's really the case that it is acceptable to quote private correspondence whenever it suits the expediency of Ms Jack?
Pahoran wrote:Is that the end of your current vendetta, then?
Pahoran wrote:Evidently airing your grievance is now more important to you than bringing the dispute to an end.
Pahoran wrote:You seem to have misunderstood what I wrote.
Pahoran wrote:Have a look back over this thread. Re-read your PM's to me. Then tell me: should I take your writings as an example of soft answers that turn away wrath?
Pahoran wrote:So, having issued a 24-hour ultimatum in a forum you knew (or at least had good reason to suspect) I had not visited for months, you took no chances, but got in early. Understood.
Pahoran wrote:You have?
What were those "numerous good-faith efforts", and why, previous to last week, did I hear nothing but that you wanted the one-sentence quote removed from my sig?