Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologetics

[_RockSlider]

In summary, the official LDS Church business for which Daniel Peterson had his bishop friend access confidential member information was Loosly associated with lying for the Lord, one must stick to the moral high ground.

[_stemelbow]

Again,
Thank you for clarifying that you and other members don't think of this as a violation. Anonymous posters should be aware that church databases may be used in attempts to sleuth out their identities.

No identities were uncovered in anyway. Please don't twist people's words. That's manipulative.

[_Darth J]

No identities were uncovered in anyway.

And the relevance of this to the plain language of the LDS Church's license agreement is ______________________________.

[_Rollo Tomasi]

No identities were uncovered in anyway. Please don't twist people's words. That's manipulative.

It was the attempt to uncover an anonymous poster's identify by accessing the directory that violated the "conditions of use." It didn't matter whether DCP's bishop friend found anything.

[_MrStakhanovite]

Thanks for keeping this bumped Stem.

[_RockSlider]

Rock, if you say something over and over again, ad nauseum, it does not make it true.
You are wrong about this. There was no improper use of the directory by Dan's friend or by Dan.

The hypocracy of this statement is amazing.

Just keep repeating/telling yourself this A.I..

[_stemelbow]

It was the attempt to uncover an anonymous poster's identify by accessing the directory that violated the "conditions of use." It didn't matter whether DCP's bishop friend found anything.

Well, now you're just attributing intentions that are not what intentions were claimed. If you could stick to the facts it'd be nice.

It was already suggested taht Dan didn't expect to uncover Everybody Wang Chung's identity because he knew Everybody Wang Chung was lying. The attempt was not as you classify it.

But if you are intent on revealing Dan's intent by practicing mind reading, be my guest.

[_Darth J]

There was no improper use of the directory by Dan's friend or by Dan.

Which can be supported by the following language in the LDS Church's license agreement:_______________________________________.

[_Darth J]

It was the attempt to uncover an anonymous poster's identify by accessing the directory that violated the "conditions of use." It didn't matter whether DCP's bishop friend found anything.

Well, now you're just attributing intentions that are not what intentions were claimed. If you could stick to the facts it'd be nice.

It was already suggested taht Dan didn't expect to uncover Everybody Wang Chung's identity because he knew Everybody Wang Chung was lying. The attempt was not as you classify it.

But if you are intent on revealing Dan's intent by practicing mind reading, be my guest.

Nope. You are confusing intent with motive. Unless you are asserting that Daniel Peterson and his as-yet anonymous bishop friend are mindless automatons, it requires no mind reading to infer that they acted intentionally.

[Guest]

I've been asked to report Jersey Girl's nailing of Rockslider and his practices on Liz's board. She actually offered a few other instances in which she tried to correct Rockslider and be helpful to him. but he simply wouldn't listen to her.

We all tried. We really did--even DCP. Everyone tried to embrace him. But he insisted on fighting.

here was Rockslider's claim ealier in this thread:

Yes, the members there constantly called me a liar, falsely accusing, intelletually handicapped etc. So consider the source. Of course I've demonstrated those same things and have that reputation here at MDB as well.

Here is what Jersey Girl said on Liz's board:

Does it occur to you that he is simply sick of your sh*t?

Once again, you've generated what, 15 pages of unproductive nonsense wherein your intellectual dishonesty, lack of responsibility taking and general dancing around has served only to exasperate the most patient of posters on this board.

You think that when people disagree with what you're laying down it means they don't "like" you. Everyone is suddenly mean to you, hostile, bitter or angry.

I'll tell you what they don't like. They don't like the dancing around, the avoidance, the lack of ability to respond on point and your general jerking around everyone in sight.

I long for the day when you start another similar thread and not one poster on this board responds to it, because they aren't about to take you seriously and follow you into the ever sucking vortex that you tend to generate.