History of 20th Century Racism 101: The Southern Strategy

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
_Analytics
_Emeritus
Posts: 4231
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:24 pm

History of 20th Century Racism 101: The Southern Strategy

Post by _Analytics »

From the Civil War to the mid 20th century, a large block of southern states were referred to as “the Solid South” because in presidential politics, those states always voted Democrat in presidential elections. But as the liberal views on race became modern, the racists felt less comfortable with the Democrats. This was dramatically seen in 1968 when the racist majorities of Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and North Carolina broke from the Democrats and gave the racist George Wallace a total of 46 electoral votes in his presidential bid from the “American Independent” party.

Republicans realized that in order to become competitive in the South, they needed to appeal to southern racists, and they saw the declining loyalty of racists to the Democrats as a huge opportunity. Their plan to appeal to southern racists was called the Republican Southern Strategy.

In 1981, one of Ronald Reagan’s top political advisors, Lee Atwater, explained that as the nation’s sensibilities evolved, they needed to appeal to the racists more subtly and more abstractly. In his own words:
You start out in 1954 by saying, “Nigger, nigger, nigger.” By 1968 you can’t say “nigger”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “Nigger, nigger.”

Hearing this from Reagan’s Atwater makes explicit what was obvious from the way Reagan sought the racist vote.

Just 16 years before Reagan won the presidency was 1964. That was the time period when the federal government was pushing for civil rights in the South, and the Southern white racists were pushing back, declaring that “States’ Rights” gave them the right to have Jim Crow laws if they wanted to. In Neshoba County Mississippi in 1964,County Sheriff Lawerence A. Rainey lead a mob that lynched three civil rights workers: James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner. This murder became front-page national news, put Neshoba County on the map, and was the catalyst to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

With that background, fast-forward 16 years to Reagan. When Reagan won the Republican nomination, he knew he had to win some Southern States and that he couldn’t do so without winning the racist vote. In order to make a statement that he was with the Southern Racists, he intentionally chose Neshoba County, Mississippi, as his first campaign stop. In front of thousands of whites in Neshoba, including the KKK members that had blown up black churches and murdered civil rights activists, Reagan sent a powerful message to racists across the South by promising to “restore to states and local governments the power that properly belongs to them.” The audience cheered and the racists across the South got the message: the Republicans were on their side.

Since then, the allegiance of “Solid South” has been Republican.
It’s relatively easy to agree that only Homo sapiens can speak about things that don’t really exist, and believe six impossible things before breakfast. You could never convince a monkey to give you a banana by promising him limitless bananas after death in monkey heaven.

-Yuval Noah Harari
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: History of 20th Century Racism 101: The Southern Strateg

Post by _Kevin Graham »

An absolutely awesome post Analytics! I hope you have more to write about this transition.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: History of 20th Century Racism 101: The Southern Strateg

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Wow. That's pretty sad.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: History of 20th Century Racism 101: The Southern Strateg

Post by _subgenius »

would it not be easier to just post this link
http://reaganandracism.blogspot.com/

and then go join man in black in the conspiracy vault?

Image
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: History of 20th Century Racism 101: The Southern Strateg

Post by _beastie »

Remember the advice you gave me, Analytics. Don't expect the righters on this forum to admit this history, no matter how well-proven it is.

Here's a link to the Atwater interview which contains the quote:


http://www.thenation.com/article/170841 ... n-strategy
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: History of 20th Century Racism 101: The Southern Strateg

Post by _Droopy »

Lying...again and again and again and again and again and again...will not save this revisionist argument.

http://hnn.us/articles/kevin-d-williams ... vil-rights

http://saintpaulrepublicans.us/blog/201 ... on-racism/

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/larry-elde ... lack-vote/

Quite interesting to see a fascist/communist drone like Kevin Graham chiming in on such an obvious set-up, and quoting the former communist front rag The Nation to boot.

Let's try and cut to the chase yet again: the Left has always been racist to the core, from Karl Marx himself, to the German National Socialists, to the American eugenicist progressives of the thirties, to the diversity mongers of the present era, the Left is racism, and race is the wedge of choice to divide group against group and create tribal party loyalties (i.e., permanent Democratic voters who are immune to logic, facts, or evidence).

The Democrats were the party of racism up through the late sixties, and then became the party of Affirmative Action and Multiculturalism - intellectual and political national socialism - when it became expedient to take black Americans out of Jim Crow and onto AFDC, food stamps, HUD housing, racial solidarity over American citizenship, and sub-prime home loans.

Don't worry, the Morlocks have won, and the fatted calves have all gone to the stall.

Permanent race, gender, and class war is all that stands between the Democratic Party and the dissolution of that party as a relevant political entity.

May God hasten the day.
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: History of 20th Century Racism 101: The Southern Strateg

Post by _moksha »

If only President David O. McKay had consented and let Elder Ezra Taft Benson be the Vice Presidential running mate of George Wallace back in 1968, a Mormon could have shared in that celebrated Southern moment.

Passing the Civil Rights Act of 1965 cost the Democratic Party the support of the Southern bigots and helped build a new base for the Republican Party. Up to that point, many southerners remained POed at that "so called" Republican Chief Justice Earl Warren helping end school segregation. The Civil Rights Act cut them to the heart of their White Citizens Councils and enforced segregationist practices. The Democrats had succeeded in driving Old Dixie down and they could never be forgiven.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: History of 20th Century Racism 101: The Southern Strateg

Post by _Kevin Graham »

beastie wrote:Remember the advice you gave me, Analytics. Don't expect the righters on this forum to admit this history, no matter how well-proven it is.

Here's a link to the Atwater interview which contains the quote:


http://www.thenation.com/article/170841 ... n-strategy


Indeed. Just look at Droopy's idiotic "liar liar" response, as if we're supposed to believe the Atwater interview was a hoax. He has no substance to back it up, just the usual "liar" accusation while he slinks back to his world of pseudo-news websites written by idiotic bloggers like him.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: History of 20th Century Racism 101: The Southern Strateg

Post by _beastie »

Droopy wrote:Lying...again and again and again and again and again and again...will not save this revisionist argument.

http://hnn.us/articles/kevin-d-williams ... vil-rights

http://saintpaulrepublicans.us/blog/201 ... on-racism/

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/larry-elde ... lack-vote/

Quite interesting to see a fascist/communist drone like Kevin Graham chiming in on such an obvious set-up, and quoting the former communist front rag The Nation to boot.

Let's try and cut to the chase yet again: the Left has always been racist to the core, from Karl Marx himself, to the German National Socialists, to the American eugenicist progressives of the thirties, to the diversity mongers of the present era, the Left is racism, and race is the wedge of choice to divide group against group and create tribal party loyalties (i.e., permanent Democratic voters who are immune to logic, facts, or evidence).

The Democrats were the party of racism up through the late sixties, and then became the party of Affirmative Action and Multiculturalism - intellectual and political national socialism - when it became expedient to take black Americans out of Jim Crow and onto AFDC, food stamps, HUD housing, racial solidarity over American citizenship, and sub-prime home loans.

Don't worry, the Morlocks have won, and the fatted calves have all gone to the stall.

Permanent race, gender, and class war is all that stands between the Democratic Party and the dissolution of that party as a relevant political entity.

May God hasten the day.


You know what's funny about this post? Everyone knows Droopy well enough to ignore his frontpage mag links. The links in this post don't even work, and no one, including droopy, even noticed! The links he provides that work are actually as useful as the broken links he provided here.

The disturbing unifying theme of Droopy's responses to this issue is his assumption that African Americans are stupid calves who can be led by the nose. He, like Rand Paul, assumes that African Americans are too ignorant of their own history in this country to understand that the party that the support in vast numbers is actually racist and against their best interest.

What's worse is that Droopy and Rand Paul can't even see that this is what they are doing. This is likely to be the tone of the GOP outreach. They can't help themselves, just like Rick Santorum couldn't help himself.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162- ... nt-reform/

Answering a question about foreign influence on the U.S. economy, the former Pennsylvania senator went on to discuss the American entitlement system - which he argued is being used to politically exploit its beneficiaries.


"It just keeps expanding - I was in Indianola a few months ago and I was talking to someone who works in the department of public welfare here, and she told me that the state of Iowa is going to get fined if they don't sign up more people under the Medicaid program," Santorum said. "They're just pushing harder and harder to get more and more of you dependent upon them so they can get your vote. That's what the bottom line is."


He added: "I don't want to make black people's lives better by giving them somebody else's money; I want to give them the opportunity to go out and earn the money."


"Right," responded one audience member, as another woman can be seen nodding.


"And provide for themselves and their families," Santorum added, to applause. "The best way to do that is to get the manufacturing sector of the economy rolling again."


It is unclear why Santorum pinpointed blacks specifically as recipients of federal aid. The original questioner asked "how do we get off this crazy train? We've got so much foreign influence in this country now," adding "where do we go from here?"


CBS News found that of the people on food stamps in Iowa, only nine percent are black and 84 percent are white.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: History of 20th Century Racism 101: The Southern Strateg

Post by _beastie »

The truth is one doesn't even have to read droopy's links to know his response. He, like other people ignorant of history, claim that since Nixon himself did not stake out opposition to the civil rights movement, the Southern Strategy is all a lie. All this shows is that they do not really understand the strategy.

Kevin Phillips, who was as important to the Southern Strategy as Lee Atwater, revealed some of this in his interview "It's All in the Charts". I can only find a pdf of the article which makes it difficult to quote using copy and paste, so I'm using another article that have cited him as reference.

http://suite101.com/article/the-souther ... on-a269466

The 'Southern Strategy' is a term used to describe the Republican's method of winning previously unattainable votes of white Americans in the formerly Democrat South, during the early 20th century. The term is attributed (although he really just popularised it) to Kevin Phillips, a former Richard Nixon campaign adviser. Phillips stated to the Republican Party that there was an opportunity to polarise the Southern voting, after seeing the Democrat Party fill with black votes. By standing for the idea of 'state-rights,' without being totally against integration, Phillips hoped to attract anti-black whites to vote Republican.

During a 1970 New York Times interview, Phillips said: "The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That's where the votes are".

Richard Nixon’s Implementation Of The Southern Strategy

The Southern Strategy was implemented in the 1968 Richard Nixon-Hubert Humphrey election. In the Southern states, voters were concerned about state order and law enforcement. There were frequent reports of rioting young Americans burning army draft cards and US flags in response to the Vietnam War, African-American students rioting and the 'hippy movement', drugs, and 'free love'.

All of these factors concerned the Southern white population, a deeply Christian and patriotic part of America: the reports scandalized many and created a concern about law and order. After the assassination of Martian Luther King, the Civil Rights movement became a more freely violent movement with the relationship between whites and blacks becoming more fractious. Other causes of unrest were the long and unpopular Vietnam War, and the notion of Black Power.

The Nixon campaign spotted the problems and disruption amongst Democrat supporters and sought to exploit and tap into previously unreachable votes. Nixon began his 1968 campaign on the message of 'state rights' and 'law and order' and it proved popular; he picked up Virginia, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida. Whilst Humphrey the Democrat candidate managed to hold Texas, the other Southern states were won by an independent candidate George Wallace, who did slightly negate Nixon's Southern Strategy by being almost explicitly opposed to integration and black Civil Rights.

1972 Election Campaign Policy

The Southern Strategy proved itself an effective tool in the Republican campaign arsenal in the 1968 election; it was to be even more influential in the 1972 presidential campaign. Nixon managed to win every state in the Union except Massachusetts, taking over 70% of the popular vote in the Southern states, with an overall percentage of 61% of the national vote.

Even though he appealed strongly to white Southerners, Richard Nixon portrayed himself as a moderate, not an anti civil rights candidate, which allowed him to maintain the Republican wins in other states. He gained a cemented majority in the Electoral College because he was able to appear reasonable to many Americans. The Southern Strategy talked about integration and Civil Rights subtly through 'states' rights' and 'law and order', amongst other smaller issues that were relevant for voters in the South.

Cultural Change Across America

The evolution of the Southern Strategy was a much debated topic, however, once civil rights became accepted across America it was obviously detrimental and resulted in a huge backlash for a party that based its campaign strategy on opposition to it. Since the 1972 election, state rights have been maintained as an issue but under different titles and on a smaller scale. Larger concerns of voters, such as terrorism and the economy, have played integral roles in more recent campaigns.

The Republicans have continued to modify the Southern Strategy, as race issues have receded and been replaced by a division based on other cultural issues like abortion and religion in school. Many American political commentators feel that this progression and modernisation of the Southern Strategy that has maintained the cultural differences in voting has come to an end.

Source: Boyd, James (May 17, 1970). "Nixon's Southern Strategy: 'It's All in the Charts'". The New York Times. pp. 215.


Nixon could not take a stand against civil rights and integration. That would alienate liberal and moderate republicans, which were still allowed in the party at that point. But they still wanted to be able to exploit new opportunities in the south. Hence, the Southern Strategy relied primarily on code words - words that Southerners understood in a way that the rest of the country did not. In the South, words such as "states rights" and "nullification" ring a historical bell that the rest of the country is not in tune with, due to the south's unique history.

When conservatives opposed the civil rights act of 1964, part of their reasoning was based on states' rights. That means that states should have the right to determine these issues without interference from the federal government. Whatever philosophical justifications there may be for that stance, the reality is that the states in the South had long been using their power to continue oppressive actions against African Americans. Conservative opposition to the civil rights act would have allowed them to continue to do so.

I have lived in the South my entire adult life, with the minor exceptions of my mission and time at BYU. I am not saying that all Southerners are racist. I am saying that the South still has a higher degree of racial tension between whites and blacks than most other parts of the country. Perhaps it is not politically correct to say that aloud, but it is the truth. There are other parts of the country who have higher degrees of racial tension between Latinos and whites, or Native Americans and whites. The tendency towards racism is not limited to the South, but its expression there is largely towards African Americans. This is due to the high concentration of African Americans in the South (although some southern states, like Florida and Texas, likely also have Latino resentments). So although some may twist my words to say Southerners are a bunch of racists and are unique in that way, that is not what I am saying.

When I was a missionary in France, I noticed that the French people were very judgmental of Americans due to our racism towards African Americans, which they did not share. At the same time, I noticed some French people were racist towards people of mid-eastern descent. I think the reality is that racism infects most groups of people - it just has different targets, depending upon which "invader" one perceives as threatening the welfare of your own tribe.

So since the African-American population is higher in the south than in other parts of the country, it is natural that they become the "other" to blame for your own group's difficulties. It's not that there are more racists in the South than in other parts of the country. It's that the target of racists in the South are black, and we, as a country, notice that more readily than racism against Latinos due to our history.

What the Southern Strategy did was to find a way to appeal to those racists, while still being able to appeal to traditional republicans in other states. They found ways to "speak" to Southern racists that were hidden from others because they did not share the Southern history.

The problem for the republican party is that the African American population, better than any other group, is expert at detecting those code words.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
Post Reply