spotlight wrote:I am not forcing you to believe anything. I am just asking you to explain how your model works with this bit a factual data. According to your model our self identity is eternal. How then do you explain it becoming divided into two independent separately thinking selves?
Frank seemed to ascribe it all to the brain In other words the mortal matter and laws that science ascribes it to. But then what is left for the immortal essence to do if the mortal brain does the thinking and reasoning and experiences the self? Do we not think after death in your model? If we do, then when in mortality does the brain have its own thoughts apart from our immortal self? Does the essence control which thoughts the brain comes up with are acted upon? Whatever it is supposed to do you have to explain why the immortal self simultaneously controls each hemisphere in a different way, why it simultaneously expresses different desires and viewpoints.
An avatar doesn't know what is really going on. They are motivated, by their lack of knowledge, to make choices which are new to that avatar. The avatar's brain is purposely limited; they are not the brain we have in our first or second estate. Our ultimate, first estate self, has already made every choice there is to make. We know the effect of each choice we could ever make because we have already made those choices. By creating a "new" self, and by giving that new self its own brain...which has never made a choice about anything, we can enjoy the experiences of the new self which has no awareness of what making choices feels like....or the consequences of those choices. We don't know ahead of time what that new self is going to choose because the new self hasn't had the experience of making new choices. As the ultimate self, the creator of the new self, we now get to experience life through the eyes of the new creation.