The Erotic Apologist wrote:UtahTexan wrote:Common decency? I have not seen any here. I give as I get. So, stop with the victim comments.
And since antis have made sure my ID was known here, there, and even posted stuff from a catholic board on the MAD board, your courtesy comments mean very little. I was never shown it, so I figured y'all set the standard, I would play along. I had no idea you held such double standards. Now I do. My apologies.
All I did was say, "Hi Craig".You saw that.
So instead of discussing pre-Columbian metalurgy, or debating whether pre-Manifesto polygamy was a benign institution, or opining on the legal ramifications of Nauvoo-era bogus making, you come here to bitch and moan about how nobody here likes you? What are you, twelve?
utahtexan wrote:Are you? This thread was about another board...not about doctrine. Are you so dense not to know that? How pathetic!
You missed his point. "You come
here" refers to coming to the forum, which he further elucidated by listing topics beyond this single thread. You might also come to realize, if you do a little background research (always a valuable technique when joining a new group), that threads can easily encompass more than a single topic. It's one of the things I find so invigorating here.
Re: your 'ya'll are packdogs' comment, I posted the definition of splitting, yes? Thinking through that concept and the reputation you are developing might be helpful to you.
On the other hand, given you seem hell-bent on joining ldsfaqs as another poster child for the stunted character of a uniquely unfortunate subset of the adult Mormon cohort, carry on!! You're doing great!