UtahTexan wrote:What I HAVE seen is the same anti-stuff...
Out of interest, can you give a specific example of what you class as "anti-stuff"?
I have a question wrote:Bump for UT
The fact that UT has failed (twice) to respond to this should tell the interested viewer all they need to know about UT's motivations.
“When we are confronted with evidence that challenges our deeply held beliefs we are more likely to reframe the evidence than we are to alter our beliefs. We simply invent new reasons, new justifications, new explanations. Sometimes we ignore the evidence altogether.” (Mathew Syed 'Black Box Thinking')
The Erotic Apologist wrote:Yes, the guilty dog barked at precisely three twenty-seven in the morning. But you should really be discussing this with your bishop. I'll be praying for you!
I have a question wrote:The fact that UT has failed (twice) to respond to this should tell the interested viewer all they need to know about UT's motivations.
the fact you do not know makes it pointless to point it out to you
UtahTexan wrote: the fact you do not know makes it pointless to point it out to you
This back and forth is becoming tiresome, in addition to being meaningless.
If you choose to engage in a matter of substance and actually talk about your position and why you hold that position, I think you will find a more welcome reception here.
Seriously.
Just give it a try.
You may be pleasantly surprised.
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)
I have a question wrote:The fact that UT has failed (twice) to respond to this should tell the interested viewer all they need to know about UT's motivations.
the fact you do not know makes it pointless to point it out to you
Nice try, but seriously, you're not in kindergarten here sunshine. Put up, or shut up*.
*please let it be shut up, I put 'shut up' on the temple prayer roll so that works, right?
Last edited by Guest on Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“When we are confronted with evidence that challenges our deeply held beliefs we are more likely to reframe the evidence than we are to alter our beliefs. We simply invent new reasons, new justifications, new explanations. Sometimes we ignore the evidence altogether.” (Mathew Syed 'Black Box Thinking')
The Erotic Apologist wrote:Yes, the guilty dog barked at precisely three twenty-seven in the morning. But you should really be discussing this with your bishop. I'll be praying for you!
what? that I walk 5 miles a day? he knows that
I bet he also knows denial ain't just a river in Egypt, but I'm still praying for you! God Bless!
Surprise, surprise, there is no divine mandate for the Church to discuss and portray its history accurately. --Yahoo Bot
I pray thee, sir, forgive me for the mess. And whether I shot first, I'll not confess. --Han Solo, from William Shakespeare's Star Wars
UT, what are your views on the question of a loose versus a tight Book of Mormon translation? Or would you rather discuss the provenance and authentication of the so-called Joseph Smith daguerreotype?
Surprise, surprise, there is no divine mandate for the Church to discuss and portray its history accurately. --Yahoo Bot
I pray thee, sir, forgive me for the mess. And whether I shot first, I'll not confess. --Han Solo, from William Shakespeare's Star Wars
The Erotic Apologist wrote:I bet he also knows denial ain't just a river in Egypt, but I'm still praying for you! God Bless!
thanks...it is not always easy making that walk....the 6 knee surgeries have left the knee sore...I carry screws in the leg. But, if I cannot run, I will walk....
