Mayan Elephant wrote: ↑Thu May 27, 2021 8:07 pmhttps://publicrecordsaccess.fultoncount ... TypeId=108jpatterson wrote: ↑Thu May 27, 2021 7:17 pm
Yes, I read the article.
Your argument is that THERE ARE NO AUDITS.
That is demonstrably untrue. It seems that now your argument is that there are no state-wide audits (which I don't believe is true given that the Michigan audit news article I linked above says it was statewide)? Or that there were no pre-inauguration audits? Or that the audits were not a specific type of audit that meets your standard of approval?
Well those are entirely different arguments. Goalpost moving is not very conducive to establishing credibility.
Here is another example. Fulton County has not audited a damn thing. and yet, one can find countless articles about Georgia "audits." Here is one...
https://georgiastarnews.com/2021/01/02/ ... bb-county/
This all goes to credibility and ideology. If we like something, we find confirmation. If we do not like something, we find confirmation. I am saying that claiming that something was done when, in fact, it was not done or not done satisfactorily, is just huffing and puffing across the fault line.
Again, I'd be happy to entertain evidence of wide-spread voter fraud that would have tipped the scales of the election. To date, I haven't seen any.
Instead, you are on a wild, pedantic goose chase about what constitutes an actual audit in your mind and the level of trust of a 94% canvas vs a 100% canvas.
I think you like the idea of elections being untrustworthy, and so you've latched onto the above narrative as confirmation when it's in no way supported by fact.