SteelHead wrote:That we "are", is not proof that intelligence is eternal, sorry it does not follow. That you assert something does not make it so.
No one is moving any goalpost. Your argument relies on a special exception. If God can be an exception, so can anything else. Your argument is flawed, it relies on an exception to the premise. So far you have presented 0 evidence to support your arguments.
Keep trying.
The premise? What premise? There is no stinking premise. You just refuse to admit how awesome creation is and refuse to respect it motivated by a special agenda to hate God at any price.
The premise of the video is that everything that starts to exist must have a cause. Then the argument rests on god being a special exception to the premise, by claiming good is uncaused because God has always existed. We can grant a similar exception to the universe by positing a universe that cyclicly expands and contacts from and to a singularity, without beginning or end.
The universe is awesome, but your argument fails to necessitate a creator.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
It is better to be a warrior in a garden, than a gardener at war.
Some of us, on the other hand, actually prefer a religion that includes some type of correlation with reality. ~Bill Hamblin
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
The premise of the video is that everything that starts to exist must have a cause. Then the argument rests on good being a special exception to the premise, by claiming good is uncaused because God has always existed. We can grant a similar exception to the universe by positing a universe that cyclicly expands and contacts from and to a singularity, without beginning or end.
The universe is awesome, but your argument fails to necessitate a creator.
The video prooooooooves a creator and you are being obtuse. Youse guys pretend to worship 'EVIDENCE' as your very god and ALMIGHTY it. So refute the least bit of evidence given in the video as MORE LIKELY in the chaos of and expanding and contracting universe. How stupid is that?
SteelHead wrote:You ever stare at the texture in the ceiling above your bed and find faces, and other images?
Those images are good trying to communicate hidden knowledge to you.
The video falls far short of proving anything.
Pretend your life depends upon a jury of your peers. You get to choose the rationale in the video to clear your skirts OR the unknowableness of random chance in an expanding/contracting universe. We got our hands and instruments on the immediacy of the video. You got absolutely nothing but: "I hopah, hopah, hope there is not God out there and all the complexity of life is a crap shoot.
This is truly a pseudoscientific joke. Readily refuted by a bright middle school student. It is narrated in a robotic run-on monotone by a delusional religionist who clearly has no clue what he is talking about. He might as well be reading from an old phone book for all the good he does.
NL, have you no shame at all?
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."
DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
This is truly a pseudoscientific joke. Readily refuted by a bright middle school student. It is narrated in a robotic run-on monotone by a delusional religionist who clearly has no clue what he is talking about. He might as well be reading from an old phone book for all the good he does.
Nightlion, have you no shame at all?
Prance about all high and mighty on your stick pony mocking only with no arguments except saying there is no case.
