Some Schmo wrote:A porn star with fake breasts and high on coke is still a 1000 times more credible witness than Drumpf. I would believe pretty much anyone over Drumpf.
I don't know if I'd place the credibility gap that wide.
I am kind of torn on whether to believe the fake blonde with big breasts, or believe Stormy Daniels.
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." ~Charles Bukowski
Doctor Steuss wrote:I don't know if I'd place the credibility gap that wide.
I am kind of torn on whether to believe the fake blonde with big breasts, or believe Stormy Daniels.
hahahaha!
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents "I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
Doctor Steuss wrote:I am kind of torn on whether to believe the fake blonde with big breasts, or believe Stormy Daniels.
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Welp. I don't think I care if she was coked up or not. If she thinks she got legally screwed over then she has a right to say so and get her day in court like the rest of the world.
Here's a thought. What if she is successful and others (particularly Trump, Inc. former employees) discover that there are loopholes or discrepancies in their NDA's and they start coming out of the woodwork en masse to expose Trump for additional indiscretions and otherwise crummy treatment of employees?
This whole deal right now is about whether or not that 130K can be considered a campaign contribution.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Jersey Girl wrote:This whole deal right now is about whether or not that 130K can be considered a campaign contribution.
No one is questioning whether it was a campaign contribution. There is no doubt that it was.
What most folk are upset about is how she spent campaign funds. Not a single “Stormy for Porn Prez” banner was ever printed. Not one promised campaign speech given in “Silicone Valley”. Not a single poll paid for including the ones she danced on. And, during the campaign her campaign managers (Heidi Fliess and John Holmes Jr) tell everyone she decides, at the last minute, to slowly withdraw from the DDDdebates (pardon my stutter).
Now I’m hearing that she used most of her campaign funds for a titty tuck to address her serious stretch marks.
Jersey Girl wrote:What if she is successful and others (particularly Trump, Inc. former employees) discover that there are loopholes or discrepancies in their NDA's and they start coming out of the woodwork en masse to expose Trump for additional indiscretions and otherwise crummy treatment of employees?
Is there anyone who believes Trump didn't have sex with stormy and a bunch of other women?
Is there anyone who believes Trump didn't have sex with stormy and a bunch of other women?
It certainly doesn't matter to me. It didn't matter to WJC supporters. I'll continue to support the president with my utmost loyalty.
And when the confederates saw Jackson standing fearless as a stone wall the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
Themis wrote: Is there anyone who believesgives a darn if Trump didn't have had sex with stormy and a bunch of other women?
IFIFY
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
ajax18 wrote:It certainly doesn't matter to me. It didn't matter to WJC supporters. I'll continue to support the president with my utmost loyalty.
Of course you do. He is the only candidate to pander to the racists. I doubt you care if he did collude with the Russians, or if he destroys US democracy as long as you get a wall.
