candygal wrote:I am looking for what you guys are initially talking about...I am lost. My support to Runtu!
Runtu wrote:candygal wrote:I am looking for what you guys are initially talking about...I am lost. My support to Runtu!
You won't find it because they've deleted it. Apparently it's ok to call me a lunatic who is making things up, and it's ok to admit to doxxing, but it's not ok to point out that the person has admitted there was doxxing.
Very annoying.
candygal wrote:I am looking for what you guys are initially talking about...I am lost. My support to Runtu!
Madison54 wrote:Yes, it's only ok for THEM to make YOU look bad, didn't you know that?
You caught juliann in a lie (about the doxxing) and nailed her. She also looked like a complete a** in her other posts. So, either she deleted them all herself or she had someone else do it (my money is on Calm).
So now, it's "nothing to see here, I didn't just make a complete fool of myself!"....just move along.
Juliann wrote:No there wasn't doxxing. You are wrong. There was only enough information given so that the antagonizers were on warning that they could be doxxed. The one I remember on one of the worst stalkers was a picture from his law firm was posted with no name. Shades doxxed himself by doing a paper for Sunstone, he just didn't want anybody to use the name on the paper. While his board members were actually trying to do damage to posters in real life (like contacting my professor to make false allegations,) he thought he could just command those posters to not use his name. I have always wondered if their real fear was that they were obviously posting all day long and likely using company computers to post hate speech.
That these creeps were howling with glee over anything one of them could do to dox and damage those they hated, the absolute melt down over a mere threat of doing the same to them was hilarious. Not once did they put two and two together and come up with the idea that maybe they should stop doxxing. I don't remember much about it other than the hypocrisy was breathtaking.
If you mean the character that was created back eons ago when ZLMB (Itchy was on two boards, If I recall correctly, ZLMB and the FM board, but it might only have been ZLMB) was still alive in response to Shades' board using people's real names and possibly going after them through contacting former professors and such (can't remember if that and Scratch's "dossiers" were before or after this), I was a mod on ZLMB when Shades' legal complaint to our provider almost shut us down (I think it was the same case, ZLMB is no more so I can't check my files). It was really strange to me that Shades was complaining to ezboard or whatever it was at the time about stuff that was allowed on his board. He wanted no censorship for his board, but went over our heads even before he asked us ZLMB moderators to censor stuff he was sensitive about (at least that I saw). Itchy took on people who were stalking or harassing others in their view, If I recall correctly. My memory is that there was no actual doxxing by Itchy, just made it explicit that it could be done if the harassment on Shades' board of people who weren't posting there wasn't stopped. Shades changed his rules, I believe.
Edited Tuesday at 11:10 PM by Calm
Madison54 wrote: I just thought if anyone remembered the details who could back you up and stand up to Juliann with facts, that would be helpful and good.
Madison54 wrote:Juliann has gotten to be so horrible to deal with over there that very few even active members will engage her in a conversation now (or respond much to her comments). She seems like a very unhappy and VERY angry lady.
Jersey Girl wrote:Madison what you may not know is that a vast majority of posters from MormonDiscussions.com were banned from FAIR in the "November Purges" back then. On November 5th of that year they started bouncing us out of there en masse. So, anyone from MormonDiscussions.com who knows what happened isn't able to post there.
I was banned not having posted there in 30 days time. They simply banned people who held membership here on MormonDiscussions.com. It was perhaps a couple of years or more later that I saw something there that I wanted to correct so I re-registered using this screen name, said who I was in the first post and they permitted me to post again there. I haven't posted there in many years.
If something horribly serious were taking place there, I would have thrown in with Runtu. Besides the fact that Runtu can take care of himself, if one or more of us had shown up they would have tossed us off again, deleted the posts, and shut down the thread somehow and we'd have never seen Runtu confront her misdeed the way he did.
Rest assured that the truth of what took place is posted on this board where it will stand without censorship.
Notice where she identified a derail. She was feeling around for the cord on her parachute right then. Apparently she found it and jumped.
Runtu wrote:I may have just committed board suicide over there, but it bears noting that, if no doxxing had happened, there's no way Juliann could have known that a particular photo was of a specific poster and was taken from his law firm.