Water Dog wrote:Offered asylum in Mexico, caravan rejects it an continues march to the USA...
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/migr ... co-n925171
Yes, because when you are fleeing violence it makes sense to stop in Mexico....?
Water Dog wrote:Offered asylum in Mexico, caravan rejects it an continues march to the USA...
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/migr ... co-n925171
EAllusion wrote:Res Ipsa wrote:
I read it. I thought it was a good survey of how past president's exercised authority with respect to enforcing immigration laws. What it didn't really do was discuss the legality. It would be interesting to read an analysis of how the president's constitutional pardon power applies in the immigration context. Why couldn't the president grant a blanket pardon to all folks in the country illegally? Otherwise, there's always a tension over the extent to which the president has any discretion in enforcing the law (in contrast to acting contrary to law). i think that's a pretty longstanding clash between the legislative and executive branches.
One of the weird things is that the Constitution gives the federal government no explicit authority to regulate immigration. It's not an enumerated power. It just allows control over the naturalization process. This was as originally intended. Immigration was a free-for-all and was treated that way. If you're an originalist, which many conservatives purport to be, where's the federal authority to regulate immigration coming from?
EAllusion wrote:The rhetoric about the migrant caravan containing dangerous diseases seems to have really ratcheted up recently. Here's an example on Fox News personalities claiming the migrants are going to bring leprosy to the US.
This is so ridiculous that it should be amusing, but people take it seriously, so it's hard to laugh too much. I suspect the common reaction to this is just that it's fearmongering. I don't think that's the right take, though. Xenophobia is driven by the emotion of disgust. Disgust is the emotional desire not to be contaminated by something offensive and it underlies a lot of xenophobia. Because feeling of disgust tend to blend together, other things people innately are prone to feel disgusted by tend to correspond with xenophobic rhetoric. A classic example of this is disease, especially gross diseases like leprosy. It's also why you see other disgust-trigger terms in association with xenophobic rhetoric: "dirty" "filthy" "infest," etc.
Pay attention to how much of this caravan coverage uses disgust trigger words. When you see it, it's not so much scare tactics as sharing and attempting to spread feelings of disgust.
This post is brought to you by my overpriced education in psych.
Water Dog wrote:Offered asylum in Mexico, caravan rejects it an continues march to the USA...
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/migr ... co-n925171
Note the caravan coverage has disappeared basically overnight. Between the two, Washington Post and NYT ran over well over 100 stories on the subject in the weeks leading into the election. Dozens made the front page. They covered a obviously manufactured story into the ground even though it transparently was being used as an election strategy. Right-wing propagandist media dominates mainstream media coverage choices. The question isn't "do they?" It's "why?"Water Dog wrote:EAllusion wrote:It’s because conservative media is a major driver of the coverage choices of mainstream media
Stop trying to make yglesias' moronic "hack gap" thing happen.
EAllusion wrote:Note the caravan coverage has disappeared basically overnight. Between the two, Washington Post and New York Times ran over well over 100 stories on the subject in the weeks leading into the election. Dozens made the front page. They covered a obviously manufactured story into the ground even though it transparently was being used as an election strategy. Right-wing propagandist media dominates mainstream media coverage choices. The question isn't "do they?" It's "why?"
ajax18 wrote:EAllusion wrote:The rhetoric about the migrant caravan containing dangerous diseases seems to have really ratcheted up recently. Here's an example on Fox News personalities claiming the migrants are going to bring leprosy to the US.
This is so ridiculous that it should be amusing, but people take it seriously, so it's hard to laugh too much. I suspect the common reaction to this is just that it's fearmongering. I don't think that's the right take, though. Xenophobia is driven by the emotion of disgust. Disgust is the emotional desire not to be contaminated by something offensive and it underlies a lot of xenophobia. Because feeling of disgust tend to blend together, other things people innately are prone to feel disgusted by tend to correspond with xenophobic rhetoric. A classic example of this is disease, especially gross diseases like leprosy. It's also why you see other disgust-trigger terms in association with xenophobic rhetoric: "dirty" "filthy" "infest," etc.
Pay attention to how much of this caravan coverage uses disgust trigger words. When you see it, it's not so much scare tactics as sharing and attempting to spread feelings of disgust.
This post is brought to you by my overpriced education in psych.
Go live in Central America for a little while. Once you've smelt it as well as seen it, you'll soon realize that no fearmongerer needed to send you subliminal messages to incite your emotion of disgust. You'll realize your primitive brain had very good reason to see it as disgusting.
Water Dog wrote:Offered asylum in Mexico, caravan rejects it an continues march to the USA...
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/migr ... co-n925171