The hell of Mormon afterlife

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_fetchface
_Emeritus
Posts: 1526
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:38 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _fetchface »

Stem wrote:Every single person on this earth has repented of something (we're going to leave out any psychopaths you might have in mind, if you would, for the sake of this discussion). I'm making an assumption I guess. But I can't imagine anyone who has lived not living more than say 20 years and not felt bad about something he/she did and wanted to change or improve. No one has not sinned (let's leave Jesus out for the sake of discussing this). And it is likely true, I'm assuming, no one has ever accounted for every wrong deed (be it thought or action) he/she has done, not even the bestest of the best Mormon. If the problem we face is in order to really repent someone has to accomplish the five steps unofficially taught by Mormons, well then, arbitrariness is paramount. As it is most of humanity likely never categorized repentance that way, and perhaps never really ever used that term in the first place. And why has most of humanity not done the 5 steps, in order, and named them as such? Because they simply didn't arrive at a certain time and place.

Yep, this is why I say that Mormon God is simply an extremely powerful bureaucrat. All people I have ever met are basically good (excluding the sociopaths). God doesn't care. The only people getting into heaven are those who filled out all boxes on the form and filed it on time. They get their license to enter heaven with the official embossed seal. It's not about being good, it is about following the process.
Ubi Dubium Ibi Libertas
My Blog: http://untanglingmybrain.blogspot.com/
_Stem
_Emeritus
Posts: 1234
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:21 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _Stem »

I found a few more moments this morning so I think I'll expand a bit on where I was going earlier.

One might counter D&C 76 wherein it says the best someone can get if they aren't Mormon is terrestrial, with D&C 137 wherein it suggests people who woulda, shoulda become Mormon but didn't because they died without the law nor accepted the gospel after this life, are celestialized.

lso all that shall die henseforth, with<​out​> a knowledge of it, who would have received it, with all their hearts, shall be heirs of that kingdom, for I the Lord <​will​> judge all men according to their works7 according to the desires of their hearts— and again I also beheld the Terrestial kingdomI also beheld that all children who die before they arive to the years of accountability, are saved in the celestial kingdom of heaven—


We have a few problems here. 1. this directly contradicts revelation from God in D&C 76. But there are contradictions throughout scriptures so believers just pick and choose. 2. Also,let's quote:

Also Eldr Brigham Young standing in a strange land, in the far southwest, in a desert place, upon a rock in the midst of about a dozen men of colour, who, appeared hostile. He was preaching to them in their own toung, and the angel of God standing above his head with a drawn sword in his hand protecting him, but he did not see it,— and I finally saw the 12 in the celestial kingdom of God,— I also beheld the redemption of Zion, and many things which the toung of man, cannot discribe in full,


So this was cut out fo the D&C but it was part of the revelation Joseph gave where he saw Alvin in the celestial kingdom and wondered how that could be. Where did Brigham preach to men of color in their own tongue, where they were hostile towards him?

3. If all children who die before they arrive at the age of accountability are just exalted automatically, then it seems evidence we should kill all children before 8...always. It'd end us all, but should we not bring joy to the billions by keeping them from having to otherwise suffer for eternity?
4. Everyone we are taught will bow their knee and confess at some point. This is stated in D&C 76, which is now a debunked scripture according to D&C 137, but you know...whatever, so we'll go with it. If everyone accepts the gospel at some point, what's the distinction between if they accept it on earth or would have versus accepting it anyway? And as it is, all ordinances are supposed to be done for everyone who has died to either accept it or reject it. Well, if they are going to bow their knee then obviously they accept the gospel, and accept the proxy ordinance work.
5. Finally...we're left with nothing but big ifs. If someone would have received it on earth if given the chance what would have to be in place for them to have received it? That is if one is to accept the gospel, we were always taught, they must be prepared to accept it. And what goes into that preparing? Well that's the work of God. he put people in place and the right time and place...he put teaching into the hearts of parents, friends and family. I mean, if so, at some point, that'd be everyone. if given the right pre-requisites...we'd all be Mormon. So it feels kind of pointless. But this really highlights the apostates are devils teaching.

Alright...
_fetchface
_Emeritus
Posts: 1526
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:38 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _fetchface »

Stem wrote:4. Everyone we are taught will bow their knee and confess at some point. This is stated in D&C 76, which is now a debunked scripture according to D&C 137, but you know...whatever, so we'll go with it. If everyone accepts the gospel at some point, what's the distinction between if they accept it on earth or would have versus accepting it anyway? And as it is, all ordinances are supposed to be done for everyone who has died to either accept it or reject it. Well, if they are going to bow their knee then obviously they accept the gospel, and accept the proxy ordinance work.

Well, if they don't file the paperwork before the deadline they don't get the license to enter heaven. If there was no consequence for filing late paperwork, do you think anyone would file it on time?
Ubi Dubium Ibi Libertas
My Blog: http://untanglingmybrain.blogspot.com/
_mentalgymnast
_Emeritus
Posts: 8574
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:39 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _mentalgymnast »

Dantana wrote:
mentalgymnast wrote: I think LDS theology, such as it is, points towards a succession of gods/Gods


Here's something for your shelf MG. If the 'Great gods pyramid program' is the true order of things, and all spirits/entities were "in the beginning with the father" and un-created/always existed, doesn't this make the number of spirits/entities finite? With no replenishment loop for creating new spirits from scratch, an infinite pyramid program with a finite number of players must fail.


I've thought about that. So let's flesh that out a bit (beginning of an extended pun coming) you're getting to the end of a 'probation cycle' and the earth is reaching the end of its sojourn with people populating its surface and the last few spirit babies are coming down the chute to get their bodies. It's their turn on earth! But wait! What in the heck is going to happen to all the couples that are still doing a whole lot of procreating after those last little spirit tikes take their positions in mortality. Hmmm...are all those earthly babies going to be born without spirits?

Dantana wrote:And, a little more technically, and from a different angle. There must always be a supply of entity/intelligences waiting in the "intelligence realm" to be born into their spirit body, who can never receive that body, lest the system run dry.


From a Mormon theology point of view, the only explanation is that the well of spirits never runs dry until the 'wrapping up scenes' of an earth are completed. But even then, you're still going to have some last minute babies being born (a whole bunch of them) with need for a spirit to enter into their body to create a 'soul'

Yeah, it's all pretty hilarious and even incomprehensible looking at it from a mortal perspective, that's for sure.

The thing is though, if we are something more than biological machines and there is something that is a part of us that continues after we die, that 'something' has to get there somehow. I know a lot of protestants and others think that a spirit being of some sort begins at birth and then goes with us into the future but it didn't exist beforehand. The probationary period begins at conception.

A premortal realm where spirits are created and live is a nice thought but does create some real dilemmas when you strip away some of the layers.

Here's another since we're throwing them out. We live in a premortal realm and develop relationships of some kind/nature with those other entities around us. It's not like we're existing in a vacuum. We may even experience a sense of love and connection. Then it comes our turn to go down the chute and we wave bye and say, "See you later!" But wait...how's that going to work? I'm sure you can see the problems here.

Anyway, that one was already on my shelf. Along with some others.

Regards,
MG
_mentalgymnast
_Emeritus
Posts: 8574
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:39 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _mentalgymnast »

Stem wrote:
mentalgymnast wrote:
I'm glad we can agree on that. I should point out, however, that I'm doubtful that in any afterlife the cards fall where they may in any sense of randomness or chance. I think that in the final analysis, we will have direct control over the toss of dice. We'll know whether they're coming up sixes or not. Here on earth, with a veil of forgetfulness and lack of full understanding, we are not privy to why the cards are stacked one way or the other. We can only take advantage of the way the cards are dealt.


I don't think that's true. It seems to me we have very little say in how the cards are stacked, and in most cases that which was dealt is so impossible there is no option but to fold immediately. As it is, growing up Mormon, a very common theme was we were among the most valiant held in reserve for these latter days--as if we were all dealt 4 aces. I suppose it could have been a deceptive kind of comment wherein the speaker had no real belief we were among the most valiant and held in reserve for these latter days, but just wanted to blow air up our skirts. But that doesn't mean it wasn't a teaching. it surely was. Perhaps it was a bit of a layover of the blatant racism that the prophets used to teach (of course a "lesser race" was not valiant before the world was therefore they have a lesser chance here--the best chance for them is eternal servitude). Whatever the case, I don't think it's easy to deny that, even if any given Mormon can deny it is a true teaching or not.

What that little teaching suggests though, is people are given their station on this earth based on something done or not done before this world was. Whose to say you have the same chance at exaltation as a 2,000 BC person living in what is today China? You might say, "well he can be baptized for dead and given the other necessary ordinances" I suppose. But let's talk this out some...

If say, the big difference between your life and the life of someone who lives currently in Russia and has never heard of or become Mormon is you have gotten ordinances. Say this Russian dies tomorrow and in time is given all the ordinances you have. What does Mormonism teach:

And again, we saw the terrestrial world, and behold and lo, these are they who are of the terrestrial, …..these are they who died without law;....Who received not the testimony of Jesus in the flesh, but afterwards received it....These are they who are honorable men of the earth....These are they who receive of his glory, but not of his fulness.


So again, I suppose you can disagree with what the Church teaches and say something like, "well everyone will be given a second chance" or "those who were not preached the gospel to in this life will be given the same chance as me". Most can't take advantage of the way the cards are dealt. They either aren't dealt cards or their cards are garbage only useful to fold as quickly as possible.

I'm saying the potential for the psychopath to be saved is the same as it is for you or for me, yes.


well everyone's saved in Mormonism. So it is, the psychopath and Hitler can sing hymns hand in hand in the telestial realm, but I do believe that's the best they can get. I suppose you can say "Well God might automatically exalt those who died before the age of accountability or those who mentally never really reached that age." But that is something else..something other than what is taught.

Go back and read your Doctrine and Covenants.


Sounds to me like you should.

Sure. Not sure what you mean by "real live hell", but be that as it may...yes, I think that everyone will have the same shot at eternal bliss and happiness.


I will add it is perhaps the only sane way to be Mormon--disagree with the scriptures and stuff and say things like "everyone will have the same shot at eternal bliss". So I'll give you that. But we aren't talking about your personal unsupported views here. We're talking about Mormonism itself. The religion teaches that no, not everyone will have the same shot. As it is, only those who actually hear and accept the "testimony of Jesus" will have a shot at exaltation, or what Mormons might term eternal bliss. And I suppose as the teaching in the Church goes--those who will be relegated to the lower levels will be happy enough there. They couldn't really stand being granted eternal bliss because they couldn't live with themselves knowing they were granted the pedestal that Mormons were granted...So in a sense they get eternal bliss because that's all they could have gotten anyway. Yes, talk about mental gymnastics.

Let's think of it this way, since you are hung up on this arbitrariness I mentioned. Every single person on this earth has repented of something (we're going to leave out any psychopaths you might have in mind, if you would, for the sake of this discussion). I'm making an assumption I guess. But I can't imagine anyone who has lived not living more than say 20 years and not felt bad about something he/she did and wanted to change or improve. No one has not sinned (let's leave Jesus out for the sake of discussing this). And it is likely true, I'm assuming, no one has ever accounted for every wrong deed (be it thought or action) he/she has done, not even the bestest of the best Mormon. If the problem we face is in order to really repent someone has to accomplish the five steps unofficially taught by Mormons, well then, arbitrariness is paramount. As it is most of humanity likely never categorized repentance that way, and perhaps never really ever used that term in the first place. And why has most of humanity not done the 5 steps, in order, and named them as such? Because they simply didn't arrive at a certain time and place. So we're left with a couple of options, and please feel free to comment if you disagree:

1. Our ability and option to receive eternal bliss largely depends on something we did or thought before we ever came to earth, and those deeds are erased from our minds.
2. Arbitrariness. It all depends on random chance where and when you are, and nearly everything as it pertains to the chance at eternal bliss hinges on where and when you are.

So, as it is, and as I've concluded, achieving eternal bliss sounds like hell to me. I can't imagine sitting on a throne above them all under such conditions. I'd rather end myself. And if I couldn't end myself I'd consider it hell. In my estimation anyone who can imagine themselves exalted above them all under such conditions has a really sad view of humanity. Hey, all the power to such believers. Have at it. I simply can't do it and can't imagine why anyone would.


Nice post Stem. Truth be told, you bring up some real conundrums. Food for thought. I've thought along some of the same lines you're drawing/sketching.

There are no easy answers.

Thanks for your thoughtful response. I may take a few of your comments individually and comment on them as time allows.

I think that it is important, however, to keep open to the possibility of a creator God in the picture as we think about these things and try to imagine how things might 'work' from His perspective. Including 'Mormon things'.

But that's hard. Really hard at times.

Regards,
MG
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

I love fanfiction. There's so much world building and retconning to do! And the really fun part of LDS fanfic is you get to do MormonCon anytime you want. Just saunter on down to the temple and you get to LARP along with everyone else.

- Doc
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_mentalgymnast
_Emeritus
Posts: 8574
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:39 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _mentalgymnast »

Stem wrote:
All very interesting and I hope it continues. I'm here to learn.


As am I. Interesting stuff.

Regards,
MG
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _Lemmie »

mg:

I think that it is important, however, to keep open to the possibility of a creator God in the picture as we think about these things and try to imagine how things might 'work' from His perspective. Including 'Mormon things'.


I disagree. Considering the situation requires thoughtful and reasonable evaluation of the data. Trying to come up with ways that the data could “fit” your specific assumption leads to the same bad results that have been documented all through this thread. The best example being the demonstration that there is no difference between following a cartel boss and following the Mormon god.
_Stem
_Emeritus
Posts: 1234
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:21 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _Stem »

Lemmie wrote:
I disagree. Considering the situation requires thoughtful and reasonable evaluation of the data. Trying to come up with ways that the data could “fit” your specific assumption leads to the same bad results that have been documented all through this thread. The best example being the demonstration that there is no difference between following a cartel boss and following the Mormon god.


It seems to me he is giving precisely the rationale people must adopt in order to become followers of the cartel boss. hah...I guess you just said that. Sometimes I have to be too literal--I fault my Mormon upbringing.
_Stem
_Emeritus
Posts: 1234
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:21 pm

Re: The hell of Mormon afterlife

Post by _Stem »

mentalgymnast wrote:
Nice post Stem. Truth be told, you bring up some real conundrums. Food for thought. I've thought along some of the same lines you're drawing/sketching.

There are no easy answers.

Thanks for your thoughtful response. I may take a few of your comments individually and comment on them as time allows.

I think that it is important, however, to keep open to the possibility of a creator God in the picture as we think about these things and try to imagine how things might 'work' from His perspective. Including 'Mormon things'.

But that's hard. Really hard at times.

Regards,
MG


Thanks. I'll keep my eye out.
Post Reply