That is to say, while your aim is to sh-it upon your opponent, the result is that you sh-it upon everyone who posts here including Shades. The majority of us here follow at least some level of guiding principles. Your only guiding principle here seems to be: get even.
To get even? No, it is force them to remove their remarks.
What was Doc's and Subgenius' guiding principles when they both went after my wife? What was Doc's guiding principle when he flat out lied about what I've said several times over recent months? A CFR results in, "I can't find it because you edited it" which is just another lie. What was your guiding principle when you sat by with nary a gripe about their behavior? Oh, that's right, your only principle is to obsessively act as judge and jury according to what's in those 13 rules.
I do think it is cute the way you're trying to assume the entire forum is on your side here.
Why'd you skip over this, eh?
I would encourage you to read over the previous recent exchanges in which you attempted to disclose in real life about another poster (accurate or not) three times consecutively. Show me where on that thread, that there was an aggressive attack on a poster's wife or where as you claimed prior on this thread (the one you're reading, the one where you made the claim) where a poster attempted to supply YOUR in real life (accurate or not) and you simply "reciprocated", I mean, retaliated by making that attempt 3 times in a row.
Show that to me. Bump up the thread and show it to me.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
I would encourage you to read over the previous recent exchanges in which you attempted to disclose in real life about another poster (accurate or not) three times consecutively. Show me where on that thread, that there was an aggressive attack on a poster's wife or where as you claimed prior on this thread (the one you're reading, the one where you made the claim) where a poster attempted to supply YOUR in real life (accurate or not) and you simply "reciprocated", I mean, retaliated by making that attempt 3 times in a row.
You're such a easy opponent :rolleyes: . You can't even stay focused on the issue at hand, which is your insinuation that I broke a rule by speaking of my email exchange with other posters. You insisted it violated the rules, Shades said it doesn't. But according to you, I'm the one putting Shades down? You're so desperately trying to shift the argument to something I've never contested. Yes, no crap I outed someone recently. It was in response to him outing me, which was a direct violation of the rules you only pretend to understand and care about. You only got upset when I did it, and then made excuses as to why it was OK for him to do it. That makes you a hypocrite, period.
You can name call all you like and insult me all you like, try to side track if you like, go around in circles all you like. I have decades of experience responding to irrational tantrums. You are a walk in the park, buddy.
You actually think you're winning this.
It would take much more than having a crush on a wife beater to prove you're tough, Jersey Girl. Try dealing with the fact that you're a hypocrite and you can never admit being wrong about anything. What the hell does EA being missing have to do with anything? Nothing. You're just blathering now.
"One of the hardest things for me to accept is the fact that Kevin Graham has blonde hair, blue eyes and an English last name. This ugly truth blows any arguments one might have for actual white supremacism out of the water. He's truly a disgrace." - Ajax
And FTR, I've been interacting with dozens of posters problem-free on the forums for roughly twenty years now. I've only had issues with Mormon apologists and a few loony Right Wingers. Shades doesn't need you to lobby on Doc's behalf to smear me as some psycho. We've actually met in person, and I doubt he's going to fall for it. But go ahead and give it your best shot. You'll be basically proving everything I've said about you is true.
I don't give a sh-it where you've posted, how long you've posted, who you have met and who you have not. I am not lobbying Shades on Doc's behalf. Cam doesn't need anyone to do his bidding for him and certainly not me. The conduct you engage in is documented and erodes an online community like this. I realize the concept of something greater than one individual is a foreign concept to you but try to think hard. Think real hard.
You're right, my conduct is documented. And the only people who have a problem with it from what I've seen is you and the assholes who started attacking my wife. I'd bet most folks would say I've contributed far more to Mormon Discussions over the past 20 years than you and Doc combined. All you do is play Mama Bear to your favorites, and all Doc does is straddle the fence attacking both sides. He's been doing this since the Antishock days. He can't stand to agree with someone for too long before he has to disagree with them just for the sake of it. And I'm pretty sure Doc had an unhinged fit on this forum within the past year that had many folks thinking he was absolutely nuts. Are you saying you don't recall any of that? I had nothing to do with any of that, but just watched in amazement from the sidelines.
"One of the hardest things for me to accept is the fact that Kevin Graham has blonde hair, blue eyes and an English last name. This ugly truth blows any arguments one might have for actual white supremacism out of the water. He's truly a disgrace." - Ajax
To get even? No, it is force them to remove their remarks.
That's what the report button is for and why this board is outfitted with a Mod Team...which now exists of one person.
We've already covered this. I did report. In fact, there was an instance I couldn't get feedback for days which led me to having to call Shades on his phone, but he was real busy with work at the time. Ultimately nothing was done because technically a rule wasn't violated.
"One of the hardest things for me to accept is the fact that Kevin Graham has blonde hair, blue eyes and an English last name. This ugly truth blows any arguments one might have for actual white supremacism out of the water. He's truly a disgrace." - Ajax
Man, I hate it when mom and dad fight. Can I come stay with you for a few days uncle Gunnar?
“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”
― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
Jersey Girl, I like to think of you as a facilitator. Sometimes groups just need someone who can be another voice, perhaps a doer or motivator, and helps to keep things moving along.
- Doc
Let's put it this way. I think I am capable of acting as a facilitator and have done so. If someone shows me a job I can do I'm happy to try doing it. I just don't think anything really warrants my participation beyond the comments and questions I've posted on this thread.
I'm not being lazy here. I tend to think that too many cooks spoil the broth and I don't see a defined role for me.
That said. I'm concerned for the future of this board and it's contents. Also I think we should be making known the existence of the temporary back up board. Not many showed up there during the last disconnect.
Raining/Noah.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
That's what the report button is for and why this board is outfitted with a Mod Team...which now exists of one person.
We've already covered this. I did report. In fact, there was an instance I couldn't get feedback for days which led me to having to call Shades on his phone, but he was real busy with work at the time. Ultimately nothing was done because technically a rule wasn't violated.
What rule wasn't technically violated?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
I would encourage you to read over the previous recent exchanges in which you attempted to disclose in real life about another poster (accurate or not) three times consecutively. Show me where on that thread, that there was an aggressive attack on a poster's wife or where as you claimed prior on this thread (the one you're reading, the one where you made the claim) where a poster attempted to supply YOUR in real life (accurate or not) and you simply "reciprocated", I mean, retaliated by making that attempt 3 times in a row.
You're such a easy opponent :rolleyes: . You can't even stay focused on the issue at hand, which is your insinuation that I broke a rule by speaking of my email exchange with other posters. You insisted it violated the rules, Shades said it doesn't. But according to you, I'm the one putting Shades down? You're so desperately trying to shift the argument to something I've never contested. Yes, no ____ I outed someone recently. It was in response to him outing me, which was a direct violation of the rules you only pretend to understand and care about. You only got upset when I did it, and then made excuses as to why it was OK for him to do it. That makes you a hypocrite, period.
You can name call all you like and insult me all you like, try to side track if you like, go around in circles all you like. I have decades of experience responding to irrational tantrums. You are a walk in the park, buddy.
You actually think you're winning this.
It would take much more than having a crush on a wife beater to prove you're tough, Jersey Girl. Try dealing with the fact that you're a hypocrite and you can never admit being wrong about anything. What the hell does EAllusion being missing have to do with anything? Nothing. You're just blathering now.
Last edited by Google Feedfetcher on Sat Sep 12, 2020 6:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
