Lem wrote: ↑Thu Oct 14, 2021 6:12 pm
Philo Sofee wrote: ↑Thu Oct 14, 2021 6:04 pm
Well, on the good news side of this, this has all the qualifications of scholarly respectability and accuracy and honesty and valid up-to-date peer review to be used by Interpreter...
It just never ceases to amaze me how their "Mormon truth" has to be so obviously, blatantly, and stupidly skewed in order for them to arrive at faith promoting testimonial on the goodness and truth of the church. The level of idiocy in this is beyond calculation. I have a truly hard time fathoming how they can even stoop so low and immorally present this as any kind of evidence whatsoever. I am seriously contemplating making a video of this crap.
People make mistakes all the time. That's why we have editors, reviewers, fact checkers, etc. But missing that ONE/THIRD of your survey wasn't asked the sexual orientation question, when your study is investigating a relationship between sexual orientation and suicide? And even wondering in the paper WHY students didn't answer that question?

But still including them, and deciding they seem most like heterosexual responders?!!!!! Wow. That's really a huge error to keep compounding, over and over and over.
But, hey yeah. it makes the church look good with this issue... er..... until the article is read....

They are probably banking on 99% of their audience to just read the headline and feel good about it without actually seeing the evidence, a very Mormon way to gain further light and knowledge that Father promised. After all, they are too busy attending church, paying tithing, reading their scriptures, and other church approved material, cleaning church toilets, watching the General Conference reports on the church's website, etc., to actually bother reading the article. If the headline says all is well in Zion, then by Gawd, that's good enough for me! The chapel Mormons testimonies have been verified, stamped with approval and strengthened, job done... next article!