RFM v. Midnight Mormons—Debate

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
drumdude
God
Posts: 7209
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: RFM v. Midnight Mormons—Debate

Post by drumdude »

FBI reports of Mormon hate crimes are single digits per year, committed by 3-4 individuals. And they've been declining for the last 3+ years.
Dr Exiled
God
Posts: 2108
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:40 pm

Re: RFM v. Midnight Mormons—Debate

Post by Dr Exiled »

honorentheos wrote:
Sun Nov 14, 2021 2:24 am
Dr Exiled wrote:
Sun Nov 14, 2021 2:17 am


It's like so many family court hearings I've done over the years where I'm dealing with pro-se litigants who get a little emotional.
I stopped watching after RFM wrapped up the counterpoint saying they make things up and lie. It seems like the chance to debate Mormon issues can't break out of the personal. It won't change minds, and instead probably solidify people in the positions they hold.
Both have shows and it'll probably give both a bump.
Myth is misused by the powerful to subjugate the masses all too often.
Dr Exiled
God
Posts: 2108
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:40 pm

Re: RFM v. Midnight Mormons—Debate

Post by Dr Exiled »

drumdude wrote:
Sun Nov 14, 2021 2:27 am
FBI reports of Mormon hate crimes are single digits per year, committed by 3-4 individuals. And they've been declining for the last 3+ years.
Who cares about real facts when a good story is to be made?
Myth is misused by the powerful to subjugate the masses all too often.
User avatar
pistolero
Teacher
Posts: 257
Joined: Wed May 05, 2021 10:38 pm

Re: RFM v. Midnight Mormons—Debate

Post by pistolero »

Dr Exiled wrote:
Sun Nov 14, 2021 2:28 am
drumdude wrote:
Sun Nov 14, 2021 2:27 am
FBI reports of Mormon hate crimes are single digits per year, committed by 3-4 individuals. And they've been declining for the last 3+ years.
Who cares about real facts when a good story is to be made?
Maybe Nemo the Mormon will fact check the debate?
drumdude
God
Posts: 7209
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: RFM v. Midnight Mormons—Debate

Post by drumdude »

Screenshot 2021-11-13 203604.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Bought Yahoo
High Councilman
Posts: 523
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 8:59 pm

Re: RFM v. Midnight Mormons—Debate

Post by Bought Yahoo »

Kwaku's really good. Cardon is an idiot. Brad can't get his voice heard.
Dr Exiled
God
Posts: 2108
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:40 pm

Re: RFM v. Midnight Mormons—Debate

Post by Dr Exiled »

Bought Yahoo wrote:
Sun Nov 14, 2021 2:39 am
Kwaku's really good. Cardon is an idiot. Brad can't get his voice heard.
Kwaku is being a little overly emotional. He probably resonates with the members who are tired with the arguments against, but, still, he appears a little too uptight.
Myth is misused by the powerful to subjugate the masses all too often.
drumdude
God
Posts: 7209
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: RFM v. Midnight Mormons—Debate

Post by drumdude »

Cardon says he has personally been involved in one of those hate crimes. I would love proof of that.
Canadiandude2
CTR B
Posts: 156
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2021 11:50 pm

Re: RFM v. Midnight Mormons—Debate

Post by Canadiandude2 »

The debate won’t matter. Rules for thee but not for me.

I’ve recently discovered that in a member forum.

They will ignore or dodge your questions, while expecting you to answer theirs.

They will do no additional reading beyond the minimum of what they feel they need to support their position.

They will give no acknowledgment of harm or misrepresentation when it is done my themselves or members yet respond in outrage when it’s the other Way around.

They will pretend your responses and examples are insufficient or nonexistent without explaining why.

I’m done with such members and bad faith debaters.
User avatar
The Stig
Deacon
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 9:22 pm

Re: RFM v. Midnight Mormons—Debate

Post by The Stig »

Canadiandude2 wrote:
Sun Nov 14, 2021 3:03 am
The debate won’t matter. Rules for thee but not for me.

I’ve recently discovered that in a member forum.

They will ignore or dodge your questions, while expecting you to answer theirs.

They will do no additional reading beyond the minimum of what they feel they need to support their position.

They will give no acknowledgment of harm or misrepresentation when it is done my themselves or members yet respond in outrage when it’s the other Way around.

They will pretend your responses and examples are insufficient or nonexistent without explaining why.

I’m done with such members and bad faith debaters.
Lemme guess - Smac?
Post Reply