canpakes wrote: ↑Tue Nov 16, 2021 5:49 am
MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 16, 2021 2:42 am
I'm personally a bit skeptical about relying on emotion only. Too many mistakes have been made doing so in my observations.
That is all that
anyone has, to rely on. There are no proofs to verify one’s faith decision than can be independently tested.
As example:
I think the Spirit of God and/or the Holy Ghost speaks to our mind and our heart. So if you've sincerely prayed about and believe that you've received an undeniable witness to the truth of the Book of the Law of the Lord, then that is your path. How can someone else sway you from what you know to be true?
You’re in the midst of over 7 billion folks and only a fraction of one percent believe the same story that you do. And everyone’s relying on the same basic method of conclusion.
I'm relying on doubtingthomas to make the best decision that he is able with the facts he has at hand. He also said that he has prayed to know if the Book of the Law of the Lord is true. It is his decision as to whether or not he believes his prayers were answered.
I've expressed my views that from the track record of spiritual experiences from different and varied people in which they believe they have touched the divine in some way, that we ought to give them room to use those experiences to build upon if by so doing they find a place of happiness and reason to live a better life. Let it be. Personally, I'm a bit wary about relying on emotionally driven drivers
alone. As I said, mind AND heart. But
even then I think there is room for concern as to whether or not the divine is ACTUALLY in touch every time someone claims God or angels in their midst.
But that's not to say that God can't intervene and find ways and means to lead people to Truth. After all, God is God. But for one person to make the determination that an other has or hasn't had a bone fide spiritual experience with the divine is fraught with potential error and judgement one way or the other.
I'm more comfortable speaking for myself and my own experience than I am that of another.
Regards,
MG