Jersey Girl wrote:Well lessee. When one preys on a mentally disturbed person who would be the sicker of the two?
By "sicker," do you literally mean "sicker," or do you mean "less ethical?"
If the former, then the mentally disturbed person would remain the sicker of the two. If the latter, than the one doing the preying would become the "sicker" of the two.
Either way, that still doesn't answer my question, does it?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Jersey Girl wrote:Well lessee. When one preys on a mentally disturbed person who would be the sicker of the two?
By "sicker," do you literally mean "sicker," or do you mean "less ethical?"
If the former, then the mentally disturbed person would remain the sicker of the two. If the latter, than the one doing the preying would become the "sicker" of the two.
Either way, that still doesn't answer my question, does it?
Oh look. And Shades was being a jerk to me back then. I'm telling you. Nothing new under the sun around here.
We only get stronger when we are lifting something that is heavier than what we are used to. ~ KF
Oh look. And Shades was being a jerk to me back then. I'm telling you. Nothing new under the sun around here.
Is there a difference between being a jerk and asking for clarification?
In your case it really doesn't make sense to spend time sorting by type. Notice I never replied to your original up there. When I reply to you, you almost never reply back. You likely won't bother to reply to this one either. I figure you're just not into discussion like the rest of us, you're not sincere, or you just like being a jerk to me.
It's handier to classify you as being a jerk. Saves time and it doesn't affect the outcome.
We only get stronger when we are lifting something that is heavier than what we are used to. ~ KF