Imma call BS on this one, Doc. See this link:
https://news.knowyourmeme.com/news/4cha ... -is-a-hoax
Ah, thanks. I appreciate the debunking and clarification.canpakes wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 7:55 pm
Imma call BS on this one, Doc. See this link:
https://news.knowyourmeme.com/news/4cha ... -is-a-hoax
Considering a man was finally arrested for attempting to kill justice Kavanaugh, do you still think the law forbidding people from protesting at the homes of Supreme Court justices is unconstitutional? Or is that just part of a public officials duty to walk the gauntlet? At least Kavanaugh can afford a private security detail. Soon most working class Americans won't be able to afford to exercise their 2nd amendment rights to self protection and preservation.Unless protesters armed with weapons and handcuffs are breaking into Alito’s house to force him to abdicate his position in favor of, say, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the two are in no way comparable.
There is a law on the books that the protest arguably violates. However, it may not be Constitutional. Consider the Constitutional rights of abortion protesters to scream at and harass women seeking medical care. Why don’t the Justices have to run a similar gauntlet when they go to work every day? Even if it’s Constitutional, the protesters are not attempting violent overthrow of the government.
If that guy didn't have a gun, Kavanaugh wouldn't have to worry, eh?Considering a man was finally arrested for attempting to kill justice Kavanaugh, do you still think the law forbidding people from protesting at the homes of Supreme Court justices is unconstitutional?
You should be watching the road rather than posting the NRA bumper stickers you are reading. That must be an old truck to have both one from 80s and much more recent. I'm guessing the "cold, dead hands" one fell off or was scrapped off after the truck brake checked someone they thought was following too close. Be careful making this one of your eye exams. He might take your bumper then shoot you for being a pansy in tennis gear if he's an old 80s NRA supporter.
I guess we don't really have a draft now. I would see it as hypocritical to send someone off to war but not permit them to own a gun at the same age as a civilian. But yes I would have no problem with a law that would make certain firearm purchases off limits until after 21 yoa. That being said, how would any of these proposals really do much to stop crminals from getting guns and killing people? To me most of the gun control talk is an attempt to misdirect the public and point the voters attention to anything other than inflation, the economy, and gas prices, which right now are losing issues for Democrats.That being the case, can you get behind the idea that certain types of firearms or calibers should be off-limits to purchase until someone reaches at least 21 years of age?
Such a law wouldn't bother me. I'm not going to put much effort into campaigning for it because I don't think it will make much of a difference either way.I’m asking as someone who is a member of a firearms-owning family, so this isn’t some sort of ‘gotcha’ question. I just really want to know where you stand on this.
You can't be serious. Think about previous mass shootings and the public and political reactions, were those also nothing more than misdirection to avoid talking about inflation?Ajax wrote:To me most of the gun control talk is an attempt to misdirect the public and point the voters attention to anything other than inflation, the economy, and gas prices