Jenn Kamp Files Lawsuit Against John Dehlin

[Rivendale]

I just checked out the link you provided. It looks to be the same podcast that she posted on her YouTube channel 3 days ago. This is the podcast where she has been busy deleting anything negative or critical or questioning or challenging to her position. I have not posted there, but I do know that on Sunday night when I went to bed there were 90 comments on her YouTube podcast. When I woke up Monday morning, there were only 30, and the 30 that remained were all uniformly positive to her.

I have it on good authority that the proprietor of OTBT has been busy deleting unfavorable comments, and banning the people who posted them. I hasten to add that is completely their right to delete comments and ban commenters as they wish, but I mention it here only to give a fuller representation of what is going on than what might be apparent to the casual observer. Thanks again for providing the link!

Very confused over the wording of "another" video.

[Marcus]

I just checked out the link you provided. It looks to be the same podcast that she posted on her YouTube channel 3 days ago.

interesting, i thought i had seen that it was posted two days ago but when i follow the link now it's marked private.

I have it on good authority....

Thanks, but my instinct when people say they have something "on good authority" is to ask for verification of the authority, and to withhold judgment until that's provided. Must be the academic in me.

[pistolero]

I just checked out the link you provided. It looks to be the same podcast that she posted on her YouTube channel 3 days ago.

interesting, i thought i had seen that it was posted two days ago but when i follow the link now it's marked private.

All of a sudden, both videos are now marked as private.

That's a strange decision to make them private, these were her most popular videos by far on her channel, in terms of views... Oh wait... am I being far too cynical to wonder if this is actually a publicity stunt to draw a few people to her new channel? Surely that can't be it?

Anyway, looks like she's finally listened to reason and realised that posting videos when in the middle of a formal resolution process is a less effective idea.

This is interesting

All of a sudden, AG's reasoning on why posting a video seems to have hit a snag by Jenn Kamp removing the video after all.

[Moksha]

When the facts do come out, I expect many may be shocked at the disparity with the Jenn Kamp they think they know.

All we viewers can possibly know is what is on the podcasts. For instance, if the presenter is only wearing a Marvel T-shirt and a pair of Fruit of the Loom briefs, we would be unaware of that scant attire because of the intervening desk.

[pistolero]

When the facts do come out, I expect many may be shocked at the disparity with the Jenn Kamp they think they know.

All we viewers can possibly know is what is on the podcasts. For instance, if the presenter is only wearing a Marvel T-shirt and a pair of Fruit of the Loom briefs, we would be unaware of that scant attire because of the intervening desk.

I'm going to be enjoying the next episode of Mormonism Live so much more with this thought running through my mind.

[consiglieri]

I just checked out the link you provided. It looks to be the same podcast that she posted on her YouTube channel 3 days ago.

interesting, i thought i had seen that it was posted two days ago but when i follow the link now it's marked private.

I have it on good authority....

Thanks, but my instinct when people say they have something "on good authority" is to ask for verification of the authority, and to withhold judgment until that's provided. Must be the academic in me.

And I want you to know I do not blame you one bit!

[consiglieri]

When the facts do come out, I expect many may be shocked at the disparity with the Jenn Kamp they think they know.

All we viewers can possibly know is what is on the podcasts. For instance, if the presenter is only wearing a Marvel T-shirt and a pair of Fruit of the Loom briefs, we would be unaware of that scant attire because of the intervening desk.

[Marcus]

interesting, i thought i had seen that it was posted two days ago but when i follow the link now it's marked private.

Thanks, but my instinct when people say they have something "on good authority" is to ask for verification of the authority, and to withhold judgment until that's provided. Must be the academic in me.

And I want you to know I do not blame you one bit!

That's very generous of you! Yours is not the typical response that I would expect to receive when I ask for verification in the academic world, but I am happy to make allowances for this weird online context in which we find ourselves.

[dastardly stem]

jI have not posted there, but I do know that on Sunday night when I went to bed there were 90 comments on her YouTube podcast. When I woke up Monday morning, there were only 30, and the 30 that remained were all uniformly positive to her.

Well I’ll be…she learned something from that slippery fellow who keeps coming out on top after the mean ladies gang up on him.

Sounds like this may be nothing but an attempt to steal some sympathy. Maybe this whole fiasco will give her the boost her show needs.

Also, thanks for the comments, Dwight. Honestly I have no desire to get back into it, so happy to leave it as is. All my best.

[drumdude]

I read through a few comments on her videos a few days ago. She was responding to criticism.

The most often asked questions was, “what exactly happened and where is the evidence?” And her reply was “I have to let the legal process play out before I can say anything specific.”

Take from that what you will.