Fraudulent voting happens in small amounts, regardless of the voting system chosen.
How do you know what percentage of the votes are fraudulent?
So it's illegal to question whether the vote is accurate but it's not illegal for a noncitizen to vote if he feels in his heart that he should be allowed to do so?
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
Fraudulent voting happens in small amounts, regardless of the voting system chosen.
How do you know what percentage of the votes are fraudulent?
So it's illegal to question whether the vote is accurate but it's not illegal for a noncitizen to vote if he feels in his heart that he should be allowed to do so?
Here’s a video of two male lions damned for funsies:
Hugh Nibley claimed he bumped into Adolf Hitler, Albert Einstein, Winston Churchill, Gertrude Stein, and the Grand Duke Vladimir Romanoff. Dishonesty is baked into Mormonism.
Fraudulent voting happens in small amounts, regardless of the voting system chosen.
How do you know what percentage of the votes are fraudulent?
The myriad of MAGA and GOP funded and conducted forensic audits of the last election would be a good starting place for how we know. You know, the GOP audits that often ended up with Joe Biden getting even more votes? The GOP and MAGA audits that showed Trump lied about how many "dead people" voted? The GOP and MAGA audits that proved that the election wasn't "stolen"? Ring a bell yet?
How do you know what percentage of the votes are fraudulent?
The myriad of MAGA and GOP funded and conducted forensic audits of the last election would be a good starting place for how we know. You know, the GOP audits that often ended up with Joe Biden getting even more votes? The GOP and MAGA audits that showed Trump lied about how many "dead people" voted? The GOP and MAGA audits that proved that the election wasn't "stolen"? Ring a bell yet?
The deep state controls the audits and the election data, the same deep state that has been willing to lie for Biden, suppress social media stories that cut against the Democrat media narrative. The left has the means motive and opportunity to cheat. I think some on here would even applaud cheating as a means to saving our democracy (meaning perpetual Democrat power and disenfranchisement of the right).
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
Fraudulent voting happens in small amounts, regardless of the voting system chosen.
How do you know what percentage of the votes are fraudulent?
So it's illegal to question whether the vote is accurate but it's not illegal for a noncitizen to vote if he feels in his heart that he should be allowed to do so?
What are you raving about now? Neither one is remotely true, except in your paranoid fantasy.
he/him When I go to sea, don’t fear for me. Fear for the storm.
Jessica Best, Fear for the Storm. From The Strange Case of the Starship Iris.
The myriad of MAGA and GOP funded and conducted forensic audits of the last election would be a good starting place for how we know. You know, the GOP audits that often ended up with Joe Biden getting even more votes? The GOP and MAGA audits that showed Trump lied about how many "dead people" voted? The GOP and MAGA audits that proved that the election wasn't "stolen"? Ring a bell yet?
The deep state controls the audits and the election data, the same deep state that has been willing to lie for Biden, suppress social media stories that cut against the Democrat media narrative. The left has the means motive and opportunity to cheat. I think some on here would even applaud cheating as a means to saving our democracy (meaning perpetual Democrat power and disenfranchisement of the right).
So MAGA, and the GOP are now the deep state too. Cool.
Of course they are! Do you really believe the nonsense that any counties or precincts would be foolish enough even try to get away with not allowing or even requiring observers and representatives from each political party be involved in work of counting the votes? How could that even be legal?
Many polling places in Utah were unable to find a Democrat willing to be an election worker.
I'm sorry to hear that. That's a very sad state of affairs, in my opinion. It's also potentially dangerous given the present prevalence of MAGA influence amongst Republicans.
No precept or claim is more suspect or more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.
Wow! Is that what Ajax meant -- that partisan workers should be allowed to come into the booth to watch us vote? Of course that would be wrong! That is something we would expect only of absolute despotisms like North Korea!
It not so much what he meant -- the problem is that he throws out random talking points without thinking through what they actually mean. Fraudulent voting happens in small amounts, regardless of the voting system chosen. In every system, the vote itself is separated from the identity of the voter and cannot be recovered. That's how the system works. Ajax lives in a paranoid fantasy where hordes of brown people here illegally somehow forget that they need to stay hidden from authorities and risk discovery and deportation by voting illegally.
Thanks! I see what you mean. You are certainly right about "that he throws out random talking points without through what they actually mean." You are also obviously right about his paranoia. But, you know what people say about that. "Even paranoids have enemies."
No precept or claim is more suspect or more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.
Right? He don't need no stinkin' right. Republican talking points are seldom right.
Republicans also seem to seldom care whether their talking points are right or backed up by credible evidence and reason. They cling to the weakest and most easily discredited evidence when accusing Democrats of any wrongdoing with the same fanatical tenacity that they deny Republican wrongdoing no matter how incontrovertible, damning and abundant the supporting evidence. This is not to say that Democrats are never wrong or guilty, but I have often noticed that when any of them are wrong or guilty, they are more likely than Republicans are to be accused and criticized even by their own fellow partisans. A prime example of that is Al Franken who was rightly criticized by his fellow Democrats and who voluntarily resigned over a non-criminal, nonviolent indiscretion that was very minor compared to some of what Trump has been credibly accused of and even admitted to--including some clearly criminal acts for which he is now being prosecuted and tried! Trump is not entirely wrong about the so-called "two-tiered justice system" he constantly whines about. He is being treated more leniently by the court than any ordinary citizen would be who were guilty of much of what he is currently being prosecuted and tried for.
No precept or claim is more suspect or more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.
