Another sad personal attack on Jeremy Runnels

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 9218
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: Another sad personal attack on Jeremy Runnels

Post by Kishkumen »

Physics Guy wrote:
Fri Aug 23, 2024 5:36 pm
Perhaps part of why Mormonism seems to keep having to re-fight the same old battles is that a big part of the appeal of Mormonism is the promise of not having to fight battles at all. The most attractive form of Mormonism is surely “chapel Mormonism” with its unchallenged literal miracles, priesthood power, and so on.
I agree that the most attractive form of Mormonism is that it purports to be a religion of miracles, priesthood power, and so on. And, I think it delivers on those things to people of faith in those things. It did for me when I had faith in those things. I don't know exactly what you mean by "having no battles to fight at all," however. No one guarantees that life will be easy just because you joined the LDS Church.
Having to weigh excuses for moral failings of prophets is kind of like getting hit with a drinks bill at a resort that was supposed to be all-inclusive. The problem isn’t that the bill is unreasonable as a price for what you received. The problem is that the whole reason you came was that there weren’t going to be any bills.
Again, I am not following this idea that people thought there was no bill, no challenges, so to speak. If people do, then they have forgotten what life is like for everybody, including LDS people. I am not sure the LDS Church can be held culpable for that. I do think that people have unrealistic expectations, and I concede that claims of prophets, miracles, and the like may give people the impression that life should somehow be easier, but I don't believe that I was ever sold that bill of goods, in fact. People in the LDS Church regularly talk of their trials in life. I don't think many LDS people think there will not be any bad times or challenges.
Apologists keep on justifying the bar prices, but missionaries and teachers keep on selling the all-inclusive deal with no bills. The fact that there are in fact bills to pay remains news.
Your metaphor just doesn't work for me, but that's OK. Maybe I am just misunderstanding you. Whether one is in the mode of faith, or the faithful mindset, or not, makes a big difference here. When one steps out of it, then it is easy to move to the mindframe of bills and payments due, etc. When one is in it, there is often a sense of gratitude for the bounteous blessings already there.

The mind is a powerful thing, and it can make of experience so many different things, depending on its state. I don't think it is necessary to take other people's claims on face value for one's self, but I also don't think one can attribute one's own perceptions to another's view or state of mind.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 7915
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: Another sad personal attack on Jeremy Runnels

Post by Moksha »

The Interpreter Foundation should publish a book called:

Best Evidences That Joseph Did Not Make It All Up

The book would have a foreword by Dr. Daniel C. Peterson and start with that quote by President Dallin Oaks about not making apologies on the first page.

The Interpreter Foundation should encourage all LDS families to have this 4-page volume. We deny that three pages containing the phrase "It came to pass" were added as filler.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 5450
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:18 am

Re: Another sad personal attack on Jeremy Runnels

Post by Philo Sofee »

Moksha wrote:
Tue Aug 27, 2024 11:55 am
The Interpreter Foundation should publish a book called:

Best Evidences That Joseph Did Not Make It All Up

The book would have a foreword by Dr. Daniel C. Peterson and start with that quote by President Dallin Oaks about not making apologies on the first page.

The Interpreter Foundation should encourage all LDS families to have this 4-page volume. We deny that three pages containing the phrase "It came to pass" were added as filler.
:lol:
toon
Deacon
Posts: 211
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 5:23 pm

Re: Another sad personal attack on Jeremy Runnels

Post by toon »

Is Jeremy still really invested in this? I haven't been following things, but I don't recall hearing anything from him for a few years. Interesting that while he seems to be quiet, he still occupies space in apologists' heads.
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 7915
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: Another sad personal attack on Jeremy Runnels

Post by Moksha »

Possibly a Church research poll has identified the CES Letter as a major cause of members leaving, so they are paying big bucks to apologists for character assassination attempts on Jeremy Runnells, beyond their usual denials and pretzelized logic.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
huckelberry
God
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm

Re: Another sad personal attack on Jeremy Runnels

Post by huckelberry »

toon wrote:
Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:35 pm
Is Jeremy still really invested in this? I haven't been following things, but I don't recall hearing anything from him for a few years. Interesting that while he seems to be quiet, he still occupies space in apologists' heads.
Toon,
I wonder what sort of investment would you be wondering about. It seems possible, not unusual for an author to publish a book and then go on to other things. That would seem to be a good path for Jeremy. Why get all tangled up in some antimormon movement or crusade? I suppose he could but he might be better off letting other people wrestle with his questions and observations on their own.
User avatar
Physics Guy
God
Posts: 1968
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 7:40 am
Location: on the battlefield of life

Re: Another sad personal attack on Jeremy Runnels

Post by Physics Guy »

My idea with the metaphor of the all-inclusive resort was that even convinced believers usually acknowledge, to themselves as well as to others, that they are exercising faith to believe, and not just recognising obvious facts. Among conservative believers I've known, though, it seems to me to be a common belief and expectation that all doubts and worries should have been transcended once and for all by that one big leap of faith.

The treatment of doubt seems in fact to mirror the protestant Christian doctrine of sin: one big conversion experience deals with it all, permanently. Sin before baptism is a big part of the story, emphasised and re-emphasised constantly, but sin after baptism is an awkward detail that shouldn't really be there and shouldn't get much attention. In a similar way, confusion and uncertainty and error before conversion are a major theme, but doubts or perceived inconsistencies after conversion are awkward anomalies. People admit that they happen—they can hardly deny it—but they should be patched over quickly. They're not supposed to be there.

I think it is like an all-inclusive resort. You paid a lot to get in there, up front. Nobody pretends it was free. But it was a big selling point, that helped you decide to come to this place, that once you had paid to get in, everything from then on would be free: free of confusion, free of cause for alarm or concern, free of new kinds of doubt.

I didn't mean the metaphor to imply that life after conversion would be easy in all ways. I do think, though, that there is often an implicit contract offering a life free of intellectual disturbance. Once you get over the hump of believing the big things up front, the rest is all supposed to hang together perfectly. If you hit anything that doesn't seem to make sense, it will only be a simple misunderstanding on your part that will be resolved quickly and thoroughly.

For evangelical Protestants, the all-inclusive deal is the Bible. You have to accept its authority, once, but then it will be this infallible and unambiguous guide for all questions in future. For older denominations the deal may be to accept Church tradition. This promise that you can make one big faith leap and then never have worries again may not be shouted loudly in preaching, but in my experience it really does come up quickly in conversation with conservative believers. The prospect of having to do serious reevaluation on a regular basis is so horrifying that they often present it as a reductio ad absurdum: why, if I didn't rely on God's Word, I'd have to evaluate everything for myself, all the time! Gotcha there.

That's why I think that messy issues are a bigger deal than one might think. Even if it wouldn't really take so much additional faith to absorb them and move on, their mere existence violates an implicit contract that is quite important. When believers find that resolving an apparent problem is not actually just a matter of correcting a trivial misunderstanding, when it turns out to require a significant fresh input of faith on their part, then there's the shock and dismay of seeing a bill at a resort that was supposed to be all-inclusive. They weren't supposed to have to pay any more. That's why they chose to come here.

It was all supposed to hang nicely together now. They did their big leap. They weren't supposed to have to keep making more leaps. It was the leap to end leaps, and they made it. Why are there still leaps to make?
I was a teenager before it was cool.
User avatar
Tom
Prophet
Posts: 873
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:41 pm

Re: Another sad personal attack on Jeremy Runnels

Post by Tom »

This may have been mentioned elsewhere, but I noted that Richard Bushman made the following comments on a recent CES Letters podcast:
I have great admiration for the writer of the CES Letter. It's very extensive, huge amount of research, a lot of strong reasoning, and raises very important questions. Can we trust inspiration? That's a huge question, a great benefit to us. So I don't think we want to ostracize or deny or denounce--people do that. I think they're wrong. I think the CES Letter is wrong, but it's a noble effort and I think if we all have that same kind of inquiry--we're[?] maybe a tad more humble and a tad more willing to hear God's voice, it could lead to great and beautiful truths.
Bushman was a bit unclear in his comments. "I think they're wrong." Was he referring to people who "want to ostracize or deny or denounce"?
“But if you are told by your leader to do a thing, do it. None of your business whether it is right or wrong.” Heber C. Kimball, 8 Nov. 1857
drumdude
God
Posts: 7211
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: Another sad personal attack on Jeremy Runnels

Post by drumdude »

Posted over at SeN: The kind of unhinged Mormons that necessitate critics staying anonymous:
Must be a slow news day over at the DPOB to bring both of you out. I have to wonder if Billy Shears went by the name Pennypacker recently. My life will be far more entertaining once I learn how to track people's IP addresses.
0
Reply

J
Just Asking Michael Hoggan
an hour ago
Keep digging your grave Michael. Make it deep.
0
Reply

Avatar
DanielPeterson Just Asking
an hour ago
JA: "Keep digging your grave Michael. Make it deep."

I'm not amused, JA. Cut it out.
1
Reply

M
Michael Hoggan Just Asking
an hour ago edited
Go take a flying leap, you stupid freak. You should never mess with a paranoid schizophrenic, and you should definitely never mess with ME!
0
Reply

J
Just Asking Michael Hoggan
an hour ago edited
MH: “Go take a flying leap, you stupid freak. You should never mess with a paranoid schizophrenic, and you should definitely never mess with ME!”

Lol! You’re such a flirt. I bet you say that to all the guys.
0
Reply

Avatar
DanielPeterson Just Asking
an hour ago
JA:"Lol! You’re such a flirt. I bet you say that to all the guys."

See above.
1
Reply

Avatar
This comment was deleted.


J
Just Asking Guest
an hour ago
MH: “I've decided that I need to find out who you really are and where you really live, and I will.”

Why?
0
Reply

M
Michael Hoggan Just Asking
43 minutes ago
So that I can put a name, face and location to the insectoid nuisance that is you.
0
Reply

J
Just Asking Michael Hoggan
42 minutes ago
MH: “So that I can put a name, face and location to the insectoid nuisance that is you.”

Why is putting a name, face and location for me and my family important to you?
0
Reply

M
Michael Hoggan Just Asking
17 minutes ago
I very much doubt you have a family. If it's true, I feel supernally sorry for them.
0
Reply

J
Just Asking Michael Hoggan
10 minutes ago
MH,

Why is putting a name, face and location for me and my family important to you?
0
Reply

M
Michael Hoggan Just Asking
4 minutes ago edited
You obviously find yourself very amusing. You have my pity and you had better not be one of my former classmates
Jeremy was very brave putting his name to his work.
Marcus
God
Posts: 6682
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: Another sad personal attack on Jeremy Runnels

Post by Marcus »

drumdude wrote:
Thu Sep 05, 2024 6:24 pm
Posted over at SeN: The kind of unhinged Mormons that necessitate critics staying anonymous:
Must be a slow news day over at the DPOB to bring both of you out. I have to wonder if Billy Shears went by the name Pennypacker recently. My life will be far more entertaining once I learn how to track people's IP addresses.
0
Reply

J
Just Asking Michael Hoggan
an hour ago
Keep digging your grave Michael. Make it deep.
0
Reply

Avatar
DanielPeterson Just Asking
an hour ago
JA: "Keep digging your grave Michael. Make it deep."

I'm not amused, JA. Cut it out.
1
Reply

M
Michael Hoggan Just Asking
an hour ago edited
Go take a flying leap, you stupid freak. You should never mess with a paranoid schizophrenic, and you should definitely never mess with ME!
0
Reply

J
Just Asking Michael Hoggan
an hour ago edited
MH: “Go take a flying leap, you stupid freak. You should never mess with a paranoid schizophrenic, and you should definitely never mess with ME!”

Lol! You’re such a flirt. I bet you say that to all the guys.
0
Reply

Avatar
DanielPeterson Just Asking
an hour ago
JA:"Lol! You’re such a flirt. I bet you say that to all the guys."

See above.
1
Reply

Avatar
This comment was deleted.


J
Just Asking Guest
an hour ago
MH: “I've decided that I need to find out who you really are and where you really live, and I will.”

Why?
0
Reply

M
Michael Hoggan Just Asking
43 minutes ago
So that I can put a name, face and location to the insectoid nuisance that is you.
0
Reply

J
Just Asking Michael Hoggan
42 minutes ago
MH: “So that I can put a name, face and location to the insectoid nuisance that is you.”

Why is putting a name, face and location for me and my family important to you?
0
Reply

M
Michael Hoggan Just Asking
17 minutes ago
I very much doubt you have a family. If it's true, I feel supernally sorry for them.
0
Reply

J
Just Asking Michael Hoggan
10 minutes ago
MH,

Why is putting a name, face and location for me and my family important to you?
0
Reply

M
Michael Hoggan Just Asking
4 minutes ago edited
You obviously find yourself very amusing. You have my pity and you had better not be one of my former classmates
Jeremy was very brave putting his name to his work.
Wow. Peterson tells JA to cut it out, but he's okay leaving Michael Hoggans' threats up on his site? Doesn't patheos have rules about that?
Patheos Terms of Use wrote: C. You agree not to use any part of the Patheos Site to:

...xix. "stalk" or otherwise harass any other person or entity; and/or....

...D. You agree that you will not permit anyone else to violate this Agreement on any Patheos pages you control (your profile, private messages, group pages, etc.)...
https://www.patheos.com/terms-of-use
So much for the proprietor following Rule D.
Post Reply