TTOCMarcus wrote: ↑Wed Jul 23, 2025 6:54 amThat's classic trolling-he still wants to trash another poster from long ago, but only by innuendo and vague name-calling, because he knows he can't prove it. Meanwhile, plenty of exact, quoted evidence has been given of his bad treatment of others.mentalgymnast wrote: ...me dig up the past and demonstrate that another poster was at times a mean SOB...no thanks. I wouldn't even know where to start searching old posts at this late date...Right after he calls the person a 'mean son of a bitch.'. That's his intellectual dishonesty shining through.mentalgymnast wrote: ...And to be honest I don't want to speak poorly of those that have passed on. Honest truth...
You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)
-
MG 2.0
- God
- Posts: 8273
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)
-
MG 2.0
- God
- Posts: 8273
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)
TTOCI Have Questions wrote: ↑Wed Jul 23, 2025 7:51 amYep. Classic trolling.Marcus wrote: ↑Wed Jul 23, 2025 6:54 am
That's classic trolling-he still wants to trash another poster from long ago, but only by innuendo and vague name-calling, because he knows he can't prove it. Meanwhile, plenty of exact, quoted evidence has been given of his bad treatment of others.
Right after he calls the person a 'mean son of a bitch.'. That's his intellectual dishonesty shining through.
-
MG 2.0
- God
- Posts: 8273
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)
TTOCI Have Questions wrote: ↑Wed Jul 23, 2025 7:52 amSaid the poster who is now at 6,128 posts.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:21 amIf you folks were to be paid for your work here it would be a fairly healthy second income.![]()
And you wouldn't have to pay tithing!
Step outside and breathe. Hug a child. Serve a neighbor. Take a drive. Read a good book. Have a real life conversation. Get off the dang keyboard!
-
Chap
- God
- Posts: 3193
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:42 am
- Location: On the imaginary axis
Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)
As has now been pointed out to MG, replying by posting "TTOC" (meaning "Look! Do you see that I'm TURNING THE OTHER CHEEK?") utterly negates the quiet submission to unkindness from others that the biblical notion of cheek-turning implies. If that is what he intends, he could better achieve his aim by just remaining silent.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
- malkie
- God
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:41 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)
That you are having to point it out again suggests that either MG doesn't understand the concept; or he rejects the idea that he is negating the biblical notion; or he is acting reflexively. in my opinion, none of these explanations speaks well of him. But we have already seen that my opinion counts for little to nothing with MG.Chap wrote: ↑Wed Jul 23, 2025 7:39 pmAs has now been pointed out to MG, replying by posting "TTOC" (meaning "Look! Do you see that I'm TURNING THE OTHER CHEEK?") utterly negates the quiet submission to unkindness from others that the biblical notion of cheek-turning implies. If that is what he intends, he could better achieve his aim by just remaining silent.
I'm waiting for him to reply "TTOC"
You can help Ukraine by talking for an hour a week!! PM me, or check www.enginprogram.org for details.
Слава Україні!, 𝑺𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑼𝒌𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒊!
Слава Україні!, 𝑺𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑼𝒌𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒊!
-
I Have Questions
- God
- Posts: 4051
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)
He intends it to be a passive-aggressive snub that will irritate the person he’s replying to. As you say, he could choose to simply not respond to those posts he finds offensive (I would note he’s also posted it in response to someone who was engaged in a discussion he wasn’t involved in. He just jumped in a blurted out TTOC within a conversation he wasn’t even part of. He’s THAT self-absorbed and THAT rude). He just can’t help himself. His post count tells you he’s addicted to posting.Chap wrote: ↑Wed Jul 23, 2025 7:39 pmAs has now been pointed out to MG, replying by posting "TTOC" (meaning "Look! Do you see that I'm TURNING THE OTHER CHEEK?") utterly negates the quiet submission to unkindness from others that the biblical notion of cheek-turning implies. If that is what he intends, he could better achieve his aim by just remaining silent.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
-
MG 2.0
- God
- Posts: 8273
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)
No. TTOC is a recognition that a conversation with the poster at hand will go downhill from that point on if further engaged in tit for tat. That hopefully DOES result in silence. It would be the other poster that would choose to escalate anything.Chap wrote: ↑Wed Jul 23, 2025 7:39 pmAs has now been pointed out to MG, replying by posting "TTOC" (meaning "Look! Do you see that I'm TURNING THE OTHER CHEEK?") utterly negates the quiet submission to unkindness from others that the biblical notion of cheek-turning implies. If that is what he intends, he could better achieve his aim by just remaining silent.
I don't want to waste the time of lurkers and others having to wade through useless banter to get to the meat of a discussion. As it is, I can't count the number of times I have made a useful contribution to a discussion and then a certain poster essentially erases what I'm saying by trolling my post with a following post saying, "Now, back to the discussion"...or making some lame comment (my opinion) in congratulating another poster, done in the effort to push my comment aside and up thread.
This poster knows that they do this and it happens time after time. It is such a waste of time.
I don't really care if my posts are ignored by anyone but to see someone, with intent, troll me and either derail or ignore what I've said and essentially cancel me out is disheartening and I would even say uncivil.
I know how to use TTOC. Don't worry about that!
Regards,
MG
- Doctor CamNC4Me
- God
- Posts: 10784
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am
Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)
Last edited by Doctor CamNC4Me on Thu Jul 24, 2025 12:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
wE nEgOtIaTe wItH bOmBs
-
I Have Questions
- God
- Posts: 4051
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)
It’s now abundantly clear that MG2.0 does not have an understanding of what the phrase to “turn the other cheek” actually means. Why he would choose to abuse Christ’s words in this way is a bit of a mystery. It’s akin to taking the Lord’s name in vain. I feel sure Christ has noted his transgression.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
-
Marcus
- God
- Posts: 7967
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm
Re: You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)
He wants to disrupt, derail, and provoke, and he can't stand it when people calmly point out his trolling techniques and passive-aggression, and then carry on with their discussions.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Wed Jul 23, 2025 7:57 pmHe intends it to be a passive-aggressive snub that will irritate the person he’s replying to. As you say, he could choose to simply not respond to those posts he finds offensive (I would note he’s also posted it in response to someone who was engaged in a discussion he wasn’t involved in. He just jumped in a blurted out TTOC within a conversation he wasn’t even part of. He’s THAT self-absorbed and THAT rude). He just can’t help himself. His post count tells you he’s addicted to posting.Chap wrote: ↑Wed Jul 23, 2025 7:39 pmAs has now been pointed out to MG, replying by posting "TTOC" (meaning "Look! Do you see that I'm TURNING THE OTHER CHEEK?") utterly negates the quiet submission to unkindness from others that the biblical notion of cheek-turning implies. If that is what he intends, he could better achieve his aim by just remaining silent.
