MG, I think it is a good addition that you posted this material. It is obviously important to you; that can be respected. It can be respected while noting that it does not present any findings. It presents speculation as to why there are no findings. How persuasive a person finds those depends on reading the Book of Mormon. Your source does not have specialized expertise on that but can read like the rest of us here.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 10:57 pmWhat a brush off. This seems to be the modus operandi of critics that have developed a severe case of tunnel vision. IHQ, I seriously wonder what your qualifications are to dispute the findings of an expert human geneticist as though he was a simple amateur. Then you go with the plant geneticist because he supports YOUR worldview.
To each his or her own I guess.
Regards,
MG
Excellent takedown of Mopologist DNA misinformation
-
huckelberry
- God
- Posts: 4072
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm
Re: Excellent takedown of Mopologist DNA misinformation
-
I Have Questions
- God
- Posts: 4268
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: Excellent takedown of Mopologist DNA misinformation
It’s worse than that. MG 2.0 first believed that the Lamanites were the literal ancestors of the American Indians. Then he believed that the Lamanites were the principal ancestors of the American Indians. After that he believed the Lamanites were just one among the many different ancestors of the American Indians. And now he’s choosing to believe that the Lamanite DNA was bred out of existence and that the Lamanites aren’t the ancestors of the American Indians after all.Rivendale wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 12:19 amYou believe a rock in a hat transmitted a story over the eons and you are splitting hairs with a plant geneticist over a human geneticist. A human geneticist paid by the church. If Ugo was correct it would change the landscape of human history and it hasn't.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 10:57 pmThere is really nothing there in your sample. This has all been discussed before. You've done in depth reading on all this, right? It sounds like there are some things you are ignoring or purposely 'forgetting'.
What a brush off. This seems to be the modus operandi of critics that have developed a severe case of tunnel vision. IHQ, I seriously wonder what your qualifications are to dispute the findings of an expert human geneticist as though he was a simple amateur. Then you go with the plant geneticist because he supports YOUR worldview.
To each his or her own I guess.
Regards,
MG
He will swallow without question anything the Church he was brought up in cares to shovel his way. Even if it is the opposite of what he swallowed yesterday.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
-
Marcus
- God
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm
Re: Excellent takedown of Mopologist DNA misinformation
That's exactly right. It's a horrifying position to take. It's intellectually dishonest, and when accompanied by the gymnast's grotesquely bad manner of insulting and demeaning every person who doesn't follow his tiny religion, the result is that we have to share a board with a very ugly and mean-spirited person who takes pride and satisfaction in trolling humans. It's shameful.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 7:00 am.. .MG 2.0 first believed that the Lamanites were the literal ancestors of the American Indians. Then he believed that the Lamanites were the principal ancestors of the American Indians. After that he believed the Lamanites were just one among the many different ancestors of the American Indians. And now he’s choosing to believe that the Lamanite DNA was bred out of existence and that the Lamanites aren’t the ancestors of the American Indians after all.
He will swallow without question anything the Church he was brought up in cares to shovel his way. Even if it is the opposite of what he swallowed yesterday.
-
MG 2.0
- God
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Excellent takedown of Mopologist DNA misinformation
TTOCMarcus wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 8:15 amThat's exactly right. It's a horrifying position to take. It's intellectually dishonest, and when accompanied by the gymnast's grotesquely bad manner of insulting and demeaning every person who doesn't follow his tiny religion, the result is that we have to share a board with a very ugly and mean-spirited person who takes pride and satisfaction in trolling humans. It's shameful.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 7:00 am. . . MG 2.0 first believed that the Lamanites were the literal ancestors of the American Indians. Then he believed that the Lamanites were the principal ancestors of the American Indians. After that he believed the Lamanites were just one among the many different ancestors of the American Indians. And now he’s choosing to believe that the Lamanite DNA was bred out of existence and that the Lamanites aren’t the ancestors of the American Indians after all.
He will swallow without question anything the Church he was brought up in cares to shovel his way. Even if it is the opposite of what he swallowed yesterday.
-
MG 2.0
- God
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Excellent takedown of Mopologist DNA misinformation
Scientific knowledge has to be respected. This knowledge also comes line upon line and precept upon precept.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 7:00 amIt’s worse than that. MG 2.0 first believed that the Lamanites were the literal ancestors of the American Indians. Then he believed that the Lamanites were the principal ancestors of the American Indians. After that he believed the Lamanites were just one among the many different ancestors of the American Indians. And now he’s choosing to believe that the Lamanite DNA was bred out of existence and that the Lamanites aren’t the ancestors of the American Indians after all.Rivendale wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 12:19 amYou believe a rock in a hat transmitted a story over the eons and you are splitting hairs with a plant geneticist over a human geneticist. A human geneticist paid by the church. If Ugo was correct it would change the landscape of human history and it hasn't.
He will swallow without question anything the Church he was brought up in cares to shovel his way. Even if it is the opposite of what he swallowed yesterday.
Regards,
MG
-
MG 2.0
- God
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Excellent takedown of Mopologist DNA misinformation
As with a number of other 'issues' within Mormonism the jury is out on DNA. And I agree with you, it is within the Book of Mormon itself that one determines whether or not it holds water. Gordon B. Hinckley said as much.huckelberry wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 2:27 amMG, I think it is a good addition that you posted this material. It is obviously important to you; that can be respected. It can be respected while noting that it does not present any findings. It presents speculation as to why there are no findings. How persuasive a person finds those depends on reading the Book of Mormon. Your source does not have specialized expertise on that but can read like the rest of us here.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 10:57 pmWhat a brush off. This seems to be the modus operandi of critics that have developed a severe case of tunnel vision. IHQ, I seriously wonder what your qualifications are to dispute the findings of an expert human geneticist as though he was a simple amateur. Then you go with the plant geneticist because he supports YOUR worldview.
To each his or her own I guess.
Regards,
MG
Regards,
MG
-
drumdude
- God
- Posts: 8043
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am
Re: Excellent takedown of Mopologist DNA misinformation
The non-Mormon world laughs at the idea of Hebrews sailing to the Americas in 600BC on trans oceanic vessels and submarines. That they built civilizations over a thousand year period, and then vanished in a war where millions died. Poof into thin air without a trace.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 3:42 pmAs with a number of other 'issues' within Mormonism the jury is out on DNA. And I agree with you, it is within the Book of Mormon itself that one determines whether or not it holds water. Gordon B. Hinckley said as much.huckelberry wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 2:27 amMG, I think it is a good addition that you posted this material. It is obviously important to you; that can be respected. It can be respected while noting that it does not present any findings. It presents speculation as to why there are no findings. How persuasive a person finds those depends on reading the Book of Mormon. Your source does not have specialized expertise on that but can read like the rest of us here.
Regards,
MG
If the jury is still out on that fantasy, then the jury is still out on Atlantis, aliens building the pyramids, Harry Potter’s magic powers being real, and the location of mount Olympus upon which the Greek Gods sit.
-
MG 2.0
- God
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Excellent takedown of Mopologist DNA misinformation
Unfortunately, in my opinion, when we get TOO wrapped up in the historical conundrums that arise as we study the Book of Mormon we can lose sight of the actual purpose the Book of Mormon was brought to light. To testify of Jesus Christ in a world that has in many ways moved away from Him. Teachings concerning the Atonement, faith, etc. only ADD to the knowledge necessary to build faith unto salvation.drumdude wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 3:51 pmThe non-Mormon world laughs at the idea of Hebrews sailing to the Americas in 600BC on trans oceanic vessels and submarines. That they built civilizations over a thousand year period, and then vanished in a war where millions died. Poof into thin air without a trace.
If the jury is still out on that fantasy, then the jury is still out on Atlantis, aliens building the pyramids, Harry Potter’s magic powers being real, and the location of mount Olympus upon which the Greek Gods sit.
Regards,
MG
- malkie
- God
- Posts: 2857
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:41 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Excellent takedown of Mopologist DNA misinformation
As long as the LDS church continues to hold to a historical Book of Mormon, that message may be undermined by the need to support the ahistorical foundation.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 4:03 pmUnfortunately, in my opinion, when we get TOO wrapped up in the historical conundrums that arise as we study the Book of Mormon we can lose sight of the actual purpose the Book of Mormon was brought to light. To testify of Jesus Christ in a world that has in many ways moved away from Him. Teachings concerning the Atonement, faith, etc. only ADD to the knowledge necessary to build faith unto salvation.drumdude wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 3:51 pmThe non-Mormon world laughs at the idea of Hebrews sailing to the Americas in 600BC on trans oceanic vessels and submarines. That they built civilizations over a thousand year period, and then vanished in a war where millions died. Poof into thin air without a trace.
If the jury is still out on that fantasy, then the jury is still out on Atlantis, aliens building the pyramids, Harry Potter’s magic powers being real, and the location of mount Olympus upon which the Greek Gods sit.
Regards,
MG
You can help Ukraine by talking for an hour a week!! PM me, or check www.enginprogram.org for details.
Слава Україні!, 𝑺𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑼𝒌𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒊!
Слава Україні!, 𝑺𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑼𝒌𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒊!
-
I Have Questions
- God
- Posts: 4268
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: Excellent takedown of Mopologist DNA misinformation
Nope, you can find all of the necessary messages from Jesus in the Bible. The fictional history of a people that now aren’t claimed to be the ancestors of anybody adds nothing.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 4:03 pmUnfortunately, in my opinion, when we get TOO wrapped up in the historical conundrums that arise as we study the Book of Mormon we can lose sight of the actual purpose the Book of Mormon was brought to light. To testify of Jesus Christ in a world that has in many ways moved away from Him. Teachings concerning the Atonement, faith, etc. only ADD to the knowledge necessary to build faith unto salvation.drumdude wrote: ↑Sat Aug 23, 2025 3:51 pmThe non-Mormon world laughs at the idea of Hebrews sailing to the Americas in 600BC on trans oceanic vessels and submarines. That they built civilizations over a thousand year period, and then vanished in a war where millions died. Poof into thin air without a trace.
If the jury is still out on that fantasy, then the jury is still out on Atlantis, aliens building the pyramids, Harry Potter’s magic powers being real, and the location of mount Olympus upon which the Greek Gods sit.
Regards,
MG
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.