The last time I tried to watch an episode, which I believe was called "An Inconvenient Faith & Progressive Mormonism," there was a panel of Mormons and ex-Mormons discussing various topics related to Mormonism. Within the first 15 minutes, the term "Progressive Mormon" was mentioned at least 12 times. It's not merely that he employs the term "Progressive Mormon"; it's the manner in which he does so, as if he perceives himself as the creator of a new faith where those identifying as progressive Mormons form their own distinct religion.
Is John under the impression that he is the prophet of progressive Mormonism? He certainly behaves that way when discussing progressive Mormonism. In another episode, I recall him discussing how, prior to his influence and Mormon stories, progressive Mormonism didn't exist, as if he had created the thought process that many Mormons experience when they leave the Mormon faith to embrace the progressive Mormon movement. In other episodes, he'll get so excited discussing progressive Mormonism, highlighting how it is more inclusive, more accepting, and more open. Yet, just 30 seconds later, he shifts to demeaning Mormons and criticizing the religion.
It seems he may not be aware, but he presents himself as though he considers progressive Mormonism to be superior to traditional Mormonism, claiming sole credit for its development as a competitor to the latter. Just as Joseph Smith established Mormonism to rival Christianity, John is similarly creating progressive Mormonism to challenge traditional Mormonism.
Could someone clarify what progressive Mormonism entails? Convince me otherwise that John Dehlin does not see himself as a prophet of progressive Mormonism. Is he requesting financial support to sustain progressive Mormonism, is he not? Does he frequently articulate the beliefs of progressive Mormons? He does!
Prophet John Dehlin! It has a nice ring to it! Or maybe we can refer to John as the Temu Russell Nelson!
