Breaking!! Bill Gates Cancels Apocalypse-Plants Rejoice!!!

[canpakes]

Is that statement about Shell and carbon credits wrong?

Look it up.

Eat crap, dummy.

So there’s no dispute about what I stated. Weird to see you collapse into a preteen fit over that.

[Whiskey]

Eat crap, dummy.

So there’s no dispute about what I stated. Weird to see you collapse into a preteen fit over that.

Actually, there is nothing serious about your trolling nonsense, ever. You are a braindead nuisance. Go play shuffle games with your swastika pics, twat.

[canpakes]

So there’s no dispute about what I stated. Weird to see you collapse into a preteen fit over that.

Actually, there is nothing serious about your trolling nonsense, ever. You are a braindead nuisance. Go play shuffle games with your swastika pics, twat.

The most fun comes from playing with your ego, Binger. : D

[Whiskey]

Actually, there is nothing serious about your trolling nonsense, ever. You are a braindead nuisance. Go play shuffle games with your swastika pics, twat.

The most fun comes from playing with your ego, Binger. : D

You haven’t seen my ego, you idiot troll. You’re slobbering over your own twit troll nonsense like the know-nothing that you are.

[Molok]

Dang, how does Canpakes keep making you fly into a blind rage so easily?

[Whiskey]

Dang, how does Canpakes keep making you fly into a blind rage so easily?

Think about what you just said. Am I flying? Doing so blindly? Is it rage? And, if it is any of that, is panny making me do it? Or, are you just making crap up for your narrative, and giving panny an attaboy handy?

You are calling it a rage fit because it makes your story easier to sell. It is not rage. It is me stepping on a cockroach that keeps sprinting across the table. No emotion required. Just a boot and a purpose.

Canpakes lies, trolls, and stirs crap for attention. Pointing at that and grinding it into the pavement is not losing control. It is pest removal. If that looks like anger to you, it is because you mistake firmness for fury.

I am not worked up. I am cleaning up. He earns the beating every time.

If you think that is rage, your tolerance for BS is the problem.

[Everybody Wang Chung]

Dang, how does Canpakes keep making you fly into a blind rage so easily?

[Whiskey]

Dang, how does Canpakes keep making you fly into a blind rage so easily?

cute. This is exactly what panny is hoping for. This will help. And it is darling.

Triggering - good. Triggered - bad. Telling the triggering troll to “F” himself - really bad.

Do I have that right, wanger?

[Molok]

Dang, how does Canpakes keep making you fly into a blind rage so easily?

Think about what you just said. Am I flying? Doing so blindly? Is it rage? And, if it is any of that, is panny making me do it?

Yes, obviously. Calling people names, telling them to “F” off, using profanity every other word, these are the obvious signs of someone VERY angry.

Or, are you just making crap up for your narrative, and giving panny an attaboy handy?

No, just observing your behavior. Obviously now I'm making you angry too, because now you're openly fantasizing about sexual interactions with me.

I am not worked up. I am cleaning up. He earns the beating every time.

You're just as delusional and foolish as your hero. Cope and seethe all you like, but you're convincing exactly no one.

[Whiskey]

Dang, how does Canpakes keep making you fly into a blind rage so easily?

Think about what you just said. Am I flying? Doing so blindly? Is it rage? And, if it is any of that, is panny making me do it?

Yes, obviously. Calling people names, telling them to “F” off, using profanity every other word, these are the obvious signs of someone VERY angry.

Or, are you just making crap up for your narrative, and giving panny an attaboy handy?

No, just observing your behavior. Obviously now I'm making you angry too, because now you're openly fantasizing about sexual interactions with me.

I am not worked up. I am cleaning up. He earns the beating every time.

You're just as delusional and foolish as your hero. Cope and seethe all you like, but you're convincing exactly no one.

Obvious signs of anger? Even obvious signs of one being VERY angry?

So, your conclusions are based on assumptions, not facts. What else did you get wrong? A lot. You are losing it here, Molok. Now pretending do know crap you don't actually know and imagining things that are not there.

Stick to the damned facts, you dumbass. If you need assumptions to fill the gaps in your narrative, it is a failed narrative.