ajax18 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 1:50 pm
Dr. Shades wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 10:49 am
Thanks to all the "Kompromat" on all the American politicians generated by MOSSAD agent Epstein, we'll just have to get used to the fact that anytime Israel wants something bombed, the U.S.A. will have to join in.
MIGA!
Dr. Shades I think seizing this opportunity to topple the Iranian regime is in the best interests of America, both financially and as a matter of national security. If a terrorist regime like Khamenei's obtained a nuclear weapon, there would be another nuclear standoff as we have with Russia right now.
I’m not so sure that you’re convinced of this.
1. Why couldn’t you just take out the one nuke that they might build,
after they build it, if they ever reached that point? That would be super-embarrassing for them, to break that bottle of non-alcoholic champagne on the tip of their shiny new single nuke, only to look up and see a US bunker buster heading straight for it.
2. Russia has almost 5900 nukes and they don’t have to use them for anything. Putin just tells Trump what he wants Trump to say and do. No force required.
3. You’re missing a
huge opportunity to have Iran do your bidding by taking out a large American city, which are usually (according to you) packed full to the bursting point with
liberals. It’s not like the Iranians are going to waste their one nuke smashing the Waffle House in Liberty Hill, Texas, population 12,000.
You’re not thinking this through, ajax.