Brother of LDS apostle (Christofferson) charged with attempting to sexually exploit children in Utah and Ohio

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Brother of LDS apostle (Christofferson) charged with attempting to sexually exploit children in Utah and Ohio

Post by I Have Questions »

Some new information.
While that court case focuses on more recent accusations of sexual abuse out of state, Christofferson is accused of molesting other children years earlier while a member and leader of a Mormon — or Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints — congregation in Crystal Lake.

Initially, he was “excommunicated” by the church for that behavior, according to interviews. But he was later allowed to return as a full member — and leader.

A one-time member of Christofferson’s McHenry County congregation, former Woodstock resident Edward Nachel, told the Chicago Sun-Times that he was part of the church tribunal that convened in the mid-1990s over allegations that Christofferson molested at least one child at a “slumber party” hosted by one of his children.

While church leaders subsequently “excommunicated” Christofferson over the alleged misconduct, they apparently never went to police or told their flock, and Christofferson was allowed to continue being a part of the congregation, though with a downgraded status.

“No authorities were brought in, nothing was ever mentioned” to the membership, Nachel said, adding that a rumor was allowed to persist that Christofferson’s discipline had to do with an extramarital affair.

“Nothing was ever done to dissuade this guy from doing this stuff.”

At some point, Christofferson was “rebaptized,” and he moved to Ohio and resumed leadership roles, apparently without rank-and-file church members being told of his past.

It’s unclear who signed off on Christofferson’s return.

Nachel said Christofferson’s recent arrest in Utah spurred him to speak up. He said he took his oath seriously at the time of the tribunal that the proceedings and outcome were supposed to be secret, but he also says that had he or others spoken up long ago, perhaps they could have “stopped 30 years” of alleged abuse since then.

Nachel, who moved from the Chicago region to Utah in 2018, said he harbors guilt over what happened and has gone on Facebook to apologize to victims and families for not doing more sooner.

Current leaders of the Crystal Lake Mormon church couldn’t be reached. Crystal Lake police records show a female accuser came forward in 2022 alleging abuse at the Crystal Lake church by Christofferson years earlier when she was a child.

Criminal charges weren’t pursued because the alleged assault occurred long enough ago that the statute of limitations had expired, records show.
Cover up after cover up. Todd Christofferson admits that he knew his brother Wade was a child abuser in 2020. Yet he did nothing to alert the rest of his family to the risk his brother posed to their children if they allowed him time with them. And so he offended again, with family members in 2025.

Todd, an Apostle since 2008, didn’t have the foresight to see the risk his brother posed to the rest of his family. Or did but decided to risk it. And look at the consequences of his inaction. And he, Todd, is giving Church members counsel about how to conduct themselves. It’s ridiculous. He has shown that Apostles cannot be trusted to do the right thing, nor to have the spirit of discernment. If the church wants to retain Apostolic credibility, they have to dismiss him from office. Not put him on emeritus status, sack him for negligence and incompetence. Eyring has to go too, for the same reasons, as he signed off on the whitewashing of Wade Christofferson’s church record. Failure to do so to acknowledge that the Church and its Apostles are fully prepared to facilitate child abuse, and harbour child abusers.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
User avatar
Equality
Priest
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 4:41 pm

Re: Brother of LDS apostle (Christofferson) charged with attempting to sexually exploit children in Utah and Ohio

Post by Equality »

Why does the Sun Times say it's "unclear" who signed off on his full reinstatement? Church policy is very clear: it had to come from the First Presidency. I wonder why the newspaper got this simple fact so wrong.
"Praise be to Allah"--President Donald J. Trump
User avatar
Rivendale
God
Posts: 1903
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:21 pm

Re: Brother of LDS apostle (Christofferson) charged with attempting to sexually exploit children in Utah and Ohio

Post by Rivendale »

Equality wrote:
Sat Mar 07, 2026 1:00 pm
Why does the Sun Times say it's "unclear" who signed off on his full reinstatement? Church policy is very clear: it had to come from the First Presidency. I wonder why the newspaper got this simple fact so wrong.
It is odd. I found it in 10 minutes. Not unclear at all.
The stake president submits an application to the First Presidency only if he recommends approval (see 6.2.3).

Murder
Incest
Sexual abuse of a child or youth . . .

https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/stu ... -p411#p501
User avatar
Res Ipsa
God
Posts: 11204
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
Location: Playing Rabbits

Re: Brother of LDS apostle (Christofferson) charged with attempting to sexually exploit children in Utah and Ohio

Post by Res Ipsa »

Equality wrote:
Sat Mar 07, 2026 1:00 pm
Why does the Sun Times say it's "unclear" who signed off on his full reinstatement? Church policy is very clear: it had to come from the First Presidency. I wonder why the newspaper got this simple fact so wrong.
The author wasn’t able to learn the date of the re-baptism, so it’s not clear as to which specific individuals signed off? Do we know when the first presidency sign off was instituted? Things that are obvious to us may not meet journalistic standards.
he/him
“I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time so that my children can live in peace.” — Thomas Paine
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Brother of LDS apostle (Christofferson) charged with attempting to sexually exploit children in Utah and Ohio

Post by I Have Questions »

Res Ipsa wrote:
Sat Mar 07, 2026 3:58 pm
Equality wrote:
Sat Mar 07, 2026 1:00 pm
Why does the Sun Times say it's "unclear" who signed off on his full reinstatement? Church policy is very clear: it had to come from the First Presidency. I wonder why the newspaper got this simple fact so wrong.
The author wasn’t able to learn the date of the re-baptism, so it’s not clear as to which specific individuals signed off? Do we know when the first presidency sign off was instituted? Things that are obvious to us may not meet journalistic standards.
“By Common Consent” reports that they started insisting on it in the mid 1980’s…
In January 1985 a revision of the section “The Church Judicial System” was sent to church leaders. Once again there was a subtle but substantive change in the policy: “After excommunication, such a person is not eligible again for baptism unless approved by the First Presidency.”
It has been reported that Wade Christofferson was excommunicated in the 1990’s, so his re-baptism falls after the date First Presidency approval was instituted. And that he was serving in callings by 2006. So it was likely Hinckley, Monson, and Faust signed off on it. Todd Christofferson was made an Apostle in 2008.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
User avatar
Tom
God
Posts: 1083
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:41 pm
Location: Sego, Utah
Contact:

Re: Brother of LDS apostle (Christofferson) charged with attempting to sexually exploit children in Utah and Ohio

Post by Tom »

According to Floodlit’s timeline, Christofferson was excommunicated sometime in 1996 and rebaptized sometime in 1997. Assuming that to be accurate, the church’s 1989 General Handbook of Instructions was the governing handbook at that time. The 1989 handbook provided that First Presidency approval for a change to a person’s membership status was required in six cases:
  1. murder;
  2. incest (defined elsewhere in the handbook to mean “sexual relations between a parent and a natural, adopted, or foster child or stepchild”; the handbook noted that grandparents were considered the same as parents);
  3. advocating or teaching the doctrines of apostate sects that practice plural marriage, or affiliation with such groups;
  4. commission of a serious transgression while serving in a prominent church position (defined elsewhere in the handbook to include the positions of regional representative; stake, mission, or district president; patriarch; or bishop);
  5. an elective transsexual operation;
  6. embezzlement of church funds in substantial amounts (p. 10-11).
It should be noted that the handbook did not list child abuse apart from incest as a reason requiring a disciplinary council or a reason where a council could be necessary.

The 1998 Church Handbook of Instructions provided that First Presidency approval was required before a person could be restored to full fellowship or readmitted by baptism in seven cases:
  1. murder;
  2. incest;
  3. sexual offense against or serious physical abuse of a child by an adult;
  4. apostasy;
  5. committing a serious transgression while holding a prominent church position;
  6. an elective transsexual operation;
  7. embezzlement of church funds or property (p. 105).
The 1998 handbook also provided that a church disciplinary council was mandatory in cases of child abuse, which it defined as “a sexual offense against or serious physical abuse of a child” (p. 95).

Note: the church’s online history catalog provides digital copies of the handbooks.
Last edited by Tom on Mon Mar 09, 2026 12:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Rivendale
God
Posts: 1903
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:21 pm

Re: Brother of LDS apostle (Christofferson) charged with attempting to sexually exploit children in Utah and Ohio

Post by Rivendale »

Tom wrote:
Sun Mar 08, 2026 10:10 pm
According to Floodlit’s timeline, Christofferson was excommunicated sometime in 1996 and rebaptized sometime in 1997. Assuming that to be accurate, the church’s 1989 General Handbook of Instructions was the governing handbook at that time. The 1989 handbook provided that First Presidency approval for a change to a person’s membership status was required in six cases:
  1. murder;
  2. incest (defined elsewhere in the handbook to mean “sexual relations between a parent and a natural, adopted, or foster child or stepchild”; the handbook noted that grandparents were considered the same as parents);
  3. advocating or teaching the doctrines of apostate sects that practice plural marriage, or affiliation with such groups;
  4. commission of a serious transgression while serving in a prominent church position (defined elsewhere in the handbook to include the positions of regional representative; stake, mission, or district president; patriarch; or bishop);
  5. an elective transsexual operation;
  6. embezzlement of church funds in substantial amounts (p. 10-11).
It should be noted that the handbook did not list child abuse apart from incest as a reason requiring a disciplinary council or a reason where a council could be necessary.

The 1998 Church Handbook of Instructions provided that First Presidency approval was required before a person could be restored to full fellowship or readmitted by baptism in seven cases:
  1. murder;
  2. incest;
  3. sexual offense against or serious physical abuse of a child by an adult;
  4. apostasy;
  5. committing a serious transgression while holding a prominent church position;
  6. an elective transsexual operation;
  7. embezzlement of church funds or property (p. 105).
The 1998 handbook also provided that a church disciplinary council was mandatory in cases of child abuse, which it defined as “a sexual offense against or serious physical abuse of a child” (p. 95).

Note: the church’s online history catalog provides digital copies of the handbooks.
If all of this is correct it apparently absolves the first presidency? Am I reading that correctly?
User avatar
Gabriel
Teacher
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:20 pm

Re: Brother of LDS apostle (Christofferson) charged with attempting to sexually exploit children in Utah and Ohio

Post by Gabriel »

Rivendale wrote:
Sun Mar 08, 2026 10:36 pm
Tom wrote:
Sun Mar 08, 2026 10:10 pm
According to Floodlit’s timeline, Christofferson was excommunicated sometime in 1996 and rebaptized sometime in 1997. Assuming that to be accurate, the church’s 1989 General Handbook of Instructions was the governing handbook at that time. The 1989 handbook provided that First Presidency approval for a change to a person’s membership status was required in six cases:
  1. murder;
  2. incest (defined elsewhere in the handbook to mean “sexual relations between a parent and a natural, adopted, or foster child or stepchild”; the handbook noted that grandparents were considered the same as parents);
  3. advocating or teaching the doctrines of apostate sects that practice plural marriage, or affiliation with such groups;
  4. commission of a serious transgression while serving in a prominent church position (defined elsewhere in the handbook to include the positions of regional representative; stake, mission, or district president; patriarch; or bishop);
  5. an elective transsexual operation;
  6. embezzlement of church funds in substantial amounts (p. 10-11).
It should be noted that the handbook did not list child abuse apart from incest as a reason requiring a disciplinary council or a reason where a council could be necessary.

The 1998 Church Handbook of Instructions provided that First Presidency approval was required before a person could be restored to full fellowship or readmitted by baptism in seven cases:
  1. murder;
  2. incest;
  3. sexual offense against or serious physical abuse of a child by an adult;
  4. apostasy;
  5. committing a serious transgression while holding a prominent church position;
  6. an elective transsexual operation;
  7. embezzlement of church funds or property (p. 105).
The 1998 handbook also provided that a church disciplinary council was mandatory in cases of child abuse, which it defined as “a sexual offense against or serious physical abuse of a child” (p. 95).

Note: the church’s online history catalog provides digital copies of the handbooks.
If all of this is correct it apparently absolves the first presidency? Am I reading that correctly?
This Saints Unscripted video was uploaded 18 June 2024. The process, as I understand it, is that the First Presidency must be in the loop for rebaptism. There is a one-year waiting period after that to have one’s temple ordinances restored. This definitely requires First Presidency approval. It is done with a simple prayer. Thus, there’s no need for the recipient to go through the bother of redoing his sealings, temple marriages, first and second anointings, etc.

Restoring my covenants after leaving the Church
https://youtu.be/3KBj_iuQuVI?si=2QE5E0BKIbqKb2nT

3:57 - Where to start with restoration of blessings
5:46 - Writing a letter to the First Presidency
6:48 - Going to the temple without a recommend
8:04 - Application submitted and the waiting process
9:00 - YES! And going through the temple again

I don’t know what the protocol for restoring temple ordinances would have been in 1989.
User avatar
Rivendale
God
Posts: 1903
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:21 pm

Re: Brother of LDS apostle (Christofferson) charged with attempting to sexually exploit children in Utah and Ohio

Post by Rivendale »

Gabriel wrote:
Mon Mar 09, 2026 12:26 am
Rivendale wrote:
Sun Mar 08, 2026 10:36 pm
If all of this is correct it apparently absolves the first presidency? Am I reading that correctly?
This Saints Unscripted video was uploaded 18 June 2024. The process, as I understand it, is that the First Presidency must be in the loop for rebaptism. There is a one-year waiting period after that to have one’s temple ordinances restored. This definitely requires First Presidency approval. It is done with a simple prayer. Thus, there’s no need for the recipient to go through the bother of redoing his sealings, temple marriages, first and second anointings, etc.

Restoring my covenants after leaving the Church
https://youtu.be/3KBj_iuQuVI?si=2QE5E0BKIbqKb2nT

3:57 - Where to start with restoration of blessings
5:46 - Writing a letter to the First Presidency
6:48 - Going to the temple without a recommend
8:04 - Application submitted and the waiting process
9:00 - YES! And going through the temple again

I don’t know what the protocol for restoring temple ordinances would have been in 1989.
I don't think that is the issue. If the leaders were operating on 1989 manuals they didn't need to get first presidency approval.
User avatar
Tom
God
Posts: 1083
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:41 pm
Location: Sego, Utah
Contact:

Re: Brother of LDS apostle (Christofferson) charged with attempting to sexually exploit children in Utah and Ohio

Post by Tom »

In 1997, First Presidency approval was needed for restoration of priesthood and temple blessings (Church Handbook of Instructions, 1989, pp. 6-17 and 10-12—10-13).
Post Reply