BS. The comment about the doxing was not made for you or Cam or ceeboo.
ceeboo does not owe you or anyone else an investment in Doc Cam's bigotry in order to understand why you and others carry his piss in a bucket and apologize for his heinous insults.
You are a sloppy reader and sloppy thinker.
No one asked who the doxing comment was made for. You implied that Doc Cam has threatened and doxed on this board when you framed your claim in terms of...when Doc Cam starts to threaten and dox again.
The comment I made was about doxing. Not bigotry. Try to get on track and respond to just exactly what people are posting here, NOT mixing bigotry or insults, with an allegation of doxing.
One more time. The issue I commented on was that of your claims of a history of doxing for which you offered no proof.
Where is your proof?
LIGHT HAS A NAME
We only get stronger when we are lifting something that is heavier than what we are used to. ~ KF
I would say yes, among other bigotries. That is one of many.
He does not just mock Christianity. He insults the person and projects Doc Cam's 4Chan hobby racism onto others based on Doc Cam's bigoted stereotyping, racism, sexism and homosexism.
Was I talking to you or Ceeboo?
LIGHT HAS A NAME
We only get stronger when we are lifting something that is heavier than what we are used to. ~ KF
Let's use three claims that I have seen numerous times - Bigotry - Bully - Mocking someone's personal beliefs.
Go.
I think it's pretty clear that the "afraid of" post was simple trolling. I did not understand them as actually claiming that C is afraid of Cam. So, yeah, a form of joking.
Perhaps, but I would have preferred that you didn't supply the answer. Probably would carry more weight if the actual person answered. No?
I don't know if it's the answer. I just expressed how I understood it, based on lots of interaction with the posters involved. Communication is a two-way street, and my comment was intended to show that there was another interpretation you could have given the post that wouldn't have invited the response you gave.
Sorry, we miscommunicated on the first bit. I was talking about the claims that you said were false and not backed up by evidence. It was pretty broad brushed. I understand your objection to the three categories you listed, but that doesn't get at what I was trying to ask. No big deal.
he/him we all just have to live through it,
holding each other’s hands.
Someone who has posted numerous posts calling out his bigotry, intolerance, bullying behavior, etc, etc, is someone who displays signs of being afraid to you? That's ridiculous! Someone who is afraid of Cam would do exactly the opposite. They wouldn't say a word!
Ceeboo, regardless of you having missed the early phase of Cultellus’s spamming multiple threads with over 300 posts having nothing to do with claimed injustices perpetrated against one active board member months ago, do you feel that Cultellus’s actions are sensible, reasonable, or conducive to better board operations?
What difference does any of that make? How does his "actions" impact the challenges he has put before this community? It doesn't! It wouldn't have had any impact of the challenges if he brought flowers and bought the adult beverages or if he broke all the windows and spray painted the floor.
You/we/I can not be willing to look at the challenges - or we can refuse to get involved - or we can act like they weren't made - or we can try to excuse them - or we can offer explanations for them - etc. But what we can not do (and should not do in my opinion) is to pretend that the challenges have in fact been made and that they are something that this community should, at the very least, consider.
I have considered them and I think they are very real and legitimate challenges.
Someone who has posted numerous posts calling out his bigotry, intolerance, bullying behavior, etc, etc, is someone who displays signs of being afraid to you? That's ridiculous! Someone who is afraid of Cam would do exactly the opposite. They wouldn't say a word!
Ceeboo, regardless of you having missed the early phase of Cultellus’s spamming multiple threads with over 300 posts havingnothing to do with claimed injustices perpetrated against one active board member months ago, do you feel that Cultellus’s actions are sensible, reasonable, or conducive to better board operations?
I hope Shades simply points out the error of your ways and tells you to go your way and sin no more.
Look at that. Another thing we agree on.
I feel I can disclose this point. I am not sure it is cool to do disclose this. But on this point of agreement, I have offered to take ANY (emphasis not yelling like Philo) direction from Shades...
Of course. But not really, right? Here's an exchange from 2 weeks ago (you've deleted your posts, but you can't delete quotes of them):
Ceeboo, regardless of you having missed the early phase of Cultellus’s spamming multiple threads with over 300 posts havingnothing to do with claimed injustices perpetrated against one active board member months ago, do you feel that Cultellus’s actions are sensible, reasonable, or conducive to better board operations?
Wait, what's this about?
If you would bother yourself to examine what you are walking into and commenting on, you wouldn't need to ask that question. It is just as I said.
You jump in with both feet and make hasty assumptions about a poster based on your subjective experience with them.
That's not intellectually honest. It's bias.
LIGHT HAS A NAME
We only get stronger when we are lifting something that is heavier than what we are used to. ~ KF
I find it absolutely astonishing, ASTONISHING I SAY, that a guy who knows next to nothing about Mormonism, hasn’t demonstrated any interest in learning anything substantive about Mormonism, and will never do the hard work of understanding anything substantive about Mormonism, lacks the self-awareness that leads him to a Mormonism-centric forum to post dumbass baby gifs and bitch like a toddler about nonsense. Years of damned posting on this site and the other, and Ceeboobs couldn’t tell you the first damned thing about Mormonism that’d be interesting or informative.
But, hey. The missionary sure does love it when someone wants to talk about tHe hOlY Bible! That’s all he’s got, is to align himself with a DezNat rube who eArThQuAkEs the forum, and to evangelize on the interwebz.
- Doc
Last edited by Doctor CamNC4Me on Wed Aug 11, 2021 11:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I find it absolutely astonishing, ASTONISHING I SAY, that a guy who knows next to nothing about Mormonism, hasn’t demonstrated any interest in learning anything substantive about Mormonism, and will never do the hard work of understanding anything substantive about Mormonism, lacks the self-awareness that leads him to a Mormonism-centric forum to post dumbass baby gifs and bitch like a toddler about nonsense. Years of damned posting on this site and the other, and Ceeboobs couldn’t tell you the first damned thing about Mormonism that’d be interesting or informative.
But, hey. The missionary sure does love it when someone wants to talk about tHe hOlY Bible! That’s all he’s got, is to align himself with a DezNat rube who eArThQuAkEs the forum, and to evangelize on the interwebz.
- Doc
This post was an option for you - no doubt it is where you are most comfortable and confident.
Understand, you do have another option (still do) - You can consider the challenges that have been made.
Of course. But not really, right? Here's an exchange from 2 weeks ago (you've deleted your posts, but you can't delete quotes of them):
Quote me on this too.
I am not trolling you. Unlike trolling as a joke so it is not trolling really as Res Ipsa puts it, I am serious. I am Cultellus. That is Latin.
I trolled Doc Cam, and then I stopped and I am not trolling.
Not sure what point you are trying to make, Lem. Help me out.
No, you were clear. You are saying that you were trolling before, but now you're not. Exactly what you said to Shades two weeks ago.
It was not true when you said it to Shades then, and given the amount of trolling you've done since then, there is every indication that it is not true again now.
You said you've been banned from many forums for doing what you are doing here now; what other forums have you trolled?
