Be careful what you wish for.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Ooooh, that’s right. I did post a screen cap from the alt-Right dominated site 4chan/pol/ demonstrating right-wing racism in response to some nonsense the Cultist or Xanax or American Mike posted. What was it? Something about Leftist examples of racism? Too easy. Like shooting racists in a barrel. Just pop open Parler, or 4chan or some other forum that allows low moderation anonymous posting and our right-wing racism cups runneth over.

by the way, has our troll or our hand-wringing Christian pearl clutcher ever denounced Xanax for posting on Stormfront?

- Doc

[Res Ipsa]

[In response to RI ]
Oh. Right. Right. Got it. Right.

I am really bad at this and all you all are really good at this and the guy that posted the trolling art and the shot in the head dead black woman stuff and the 4Chan stuff and the cocksucker stuff is the best at it - true art.

I am so damned convinced.

Should we count this as agreement or disagreement?

Neither. Just more posting that is best characterized as trolling.

I would disagree. I'd describe it as the kind of hyperbolic BS some folks resort to when they can't face up to problems in their own thinking. Defense mechanism. But this is one that I would happy to agree to disagree with you on.

[canpakes]

.
Just recapping for you, as your attention span seems interrupted:

Your theory is that my demand to you should work, and that you’ll need to follow my instructions, for the good and peace of the board. You claim that a request from another board participant will do that. So, here’s the request:

“Cultellus, stop shitposting and trolling.”

Now, what you do from here on out will either prove that your ‘demands’ are honest, or not.

You chose this:

Doc Cam and the pissboys have made it very clear, they will get their way even if it is by exhaustion. And they will make no excuses and no apologies for hurting and insulting people, hopefully until they get the “F” out of here. And Screw you about your BS of putting this in another's hands. I own my own here, even if I walk away, or even if I choose to stay.

I guess that this thread has been a success, because it perfectly exposes that you’re not anything more than a bullshitting troll. And not a very good one at that.

Anyhow, keep digging your hole. I’m curious to see how much deeper you’ll go, at least until I get bored and hit that ‘ignore’ button again.

[Jersey Girl]

Doc Cam and the pissboys have made it very clear, they will get their way even if it is by exhaustion.

Get some perspective. We're asking for a mod team.

[Jersey Girl]

Not in response to me, he hasn't. Nor has anyone else on this board.* He's not mocking Christian beliefs. He's mocking YOU and the way you handle yourself here. I can provide more clarity if requested to do so.

For what it's worth, it's always nice to see you around, Ceeboo.

How is that a response to what I stated?

[ceeboo]

Hey CP

I guess that this thread has been a success

I wish I could agree with you but I can't. In my opinion, this thread has not been a success.

because it perfectly exposes that you’re not anything more than a bullshitting troll. And not a very good one at that.

Even if you're right, this thread has exposed a lot more than that. A lot more.

[canpakes]

Hey CP
…
Even if you're right, this thread has exposed a lot more than that. A lot more.

You’re right.

I only hope that our own message history, and Cultellus’s behavior here, helps guide your conclusions.

[Res Ipsa]

As is projection. I don't think you understand compartmentalization. It's the thing that allowed you to claim that you insulting me would be fine and dandy but that me insulting you would be bad. The evidence of compartmentalization is general inconsistency across different cases. If you believe I'm being inconsistent, please quote me and I'll tell you what I think.

As I read the rules, if you are the source of what you posted, you are fine. What would be prohibited is posting about any response you received from Shades.

You have, however, put your finger on a fundamental disagreement that we have. Shades is not responsible for making decisions for you about how to conduct yourself in the forum. He is not responsible for telling you to stay or go. You, and only you, are responsible for how you behave here. Full stop. You keep trying to put the responsibility for your own conduct on others. That's evidenced by your inability to justify your own intentional violation of the rules here without talking about some other poster, mostly Doc Cam. You know how to type the words "I take full responsibility for my actions," but you haven't shown any evidence that you know how to do it. You posts show a serious boundary problem -- an inability to distinguish what you are responsible for and what others are responsible for. Your offer to Shades simply confirms the existence of the problem.

You intentionally broke the rules here. That's on you. Not Doc Cam, not me, not Shades. That's all you.
Doc Cam is responsible for his own posting, not you, not me, not canpakes not Shades. Just Doc Cam.
Shades is responsible for enforcing the rules he set. Whether and how he does so is up to him and anyone he appoints as moderator. I am neither Shades no a moderator. You are neither Shades nor a moderator.

It's not hard to figure out, but you have some work to do there.

Res, you are full of crap. I respect the holier than thou and above the fray counsel approach. But it is all meant to do the same thing which is to discredit someone any way possible and deflect any light or scrutiny from your client. You are really good at your job. You do this very well. You are the best pissboy, no question about it. You, Lem, Jersey, pissboy panfakes and Doc Cam are a combined force for excuses and deflections for Doc Cam's trolling art and insult machine.

You think it is working because you and these pissboys of Doc Cam agree with you. But really, it is not working. Even if we agree on a lot of stuff. It is only making the point even more emphatically that if Doc Cam comes undone on someone, like he just did on ceeboo, you will have Doc Cam's back and you will not give a damn if he hurts anyone. You do not damned care if he hurts someone, as long as your counsel role is unblemished and you can excuse what is happening. Lem and Jersey do not have the moxie to pull off what you do, so they just passively submit and call it art even though it is smeared crap on the cage walls.

Even a monkey can be taught to type "you are full of crap." That's your go-to when faced with a reasonable argument that you can't deal with. Your unwillingness to try to read and comprehend is on you, not me.

I'm not holier than thou. I'm less holier than most. It's just that you keep insisting that I be responsible for the contents of anyone else's post.

Now, let's see who is actually full of crap. Show where I have made a single excuse for Doc Cam's posting choices. I'll save you the time. You're full of crap because you can't. There's no reason for me to make any excuses for Doc Cam because I'm not responsible for Doc Cam.

Try again, full of crap New Kid. Quote me having Doc's back when he came undone on Ceeboo. You're full of crap because you can't. I like Ceeboo. I respect Ceeboo, which should be obvious by the way I interact with him. I also respect Ceeboo as an adult man who is fully capable of standing up to words someone types on a message board or using the ignore feature. He's not a child that needs me to swoop in and protect him from the big bad words. You can rant and rave until the cows come home, I'm not going to treat Ceeboo like a child.

Frankly, I'd love a place to chat with Ceeboo about religious topics without people diving in to attack him. Same with Rad and Catholicism. And If Shades gets moderators, I look forward to responding to any rule breaking that derails a conversation I'm in with a simple click and a short note to the mods. You know the old warning about wrestling with a pig? No matter what, you come out of it covered in mud and stinking to high heaven. And the pig likes it. I have no interest in wading into what I consider to be idiotic pie fights that do nothing but increase the level of conflict on the board.

Most people are bad at mind reading. You are exceptionally bad. You want to know what I think? Just ask, and stop assuming its your place to tell me what I think. Because, every time you've told me what I think, you've been absolutely wrong.

I've been Doc's target once or twice. When he starts up, he just goes on ignore for a spell until he gets bored with trolling me. No one needs to protect me from Doc. I can protect myself. I've publicly objected to what I think of as Doc's attack mode. His answer is "you do you, I do me." And whether you or Ceeboo or me or anyone else likes it or not, as a practical matter, that is how it works on this board. Doc does Doc. I do me. You do you. Ceeboo does Ceeboo. Only Shades and moderators have the ability to take any action with respect to the tone or content of posts. And most of it involves moving stuff.

Now we did have a conversation going based on points of agreement, but I've lost the thread. I think the last thing I asked was for you to describe what I think should happen in the future if you call someone a pissboy in Paradise?

[Jersey Girl]

Hey CP

I guess that this thread has been a success

I wish I could agree with you but I can't. In my opinion, this thread has not been a success.

because it perfectly exposes that you’re not anything more than a bullshitting troll. And not a very good one at that.

Even if you're right, this thread has exposed a lot more than that. A lot more.

Your failure to engage.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

RI,

Start a thread on the Celestial forum. I’m sure Ceeboo would be thrilled to take you up on your offer.

- Doc