I made no accusations and frankly don’t understand the defensiveness.
I have simply observed that, much like others here, you more frequently take umbrage when Mormons are naughty than you do when ex Mormons are naughty. I wondered why, and I asked.
Seriously, Sledge. Maybe you should pay closer attention. I have REPEATEDLY almost the the point of OBSESSIVELY called people out for putting temple content in this forum. I find this material to be offensive, and I have said so many times.
My observation about you is that you tend to assume that people here need to answer for their anti-Mormon habits. You started out accusing me of incessantly hounding DCP in very strong and insulting terms. Then you had to back out of that when you discovered that your assumptions were incorrect.
Now you attack the one person here who regularly makes a big deal about not profaning the LDS temple in this forum on the grounds that he finds it offensive as though he were being inconsistent on this point. I police this very issue here, where the angry ex-Mormons like Shulem and Dr Exiled sometimes post temple images.
I hate that crap.
Pay attention and stop with the uninformed assumptions about me.
Otherwise I am going to start to suspect that you are nothing but a time-wasting troll.
“The past no longer belongs only to those who once lived it; the past belongs to those who claim it, and are willing to
explore it, and to infuse it with meaning for those alive today.”—Margaret Atwood
Seriously, Sledge. Maybe you should pay closer attention. I have REPEATEDLY almost the the point of OBSESSIVELY called people out for putting temple content in this forum. I find this material to be offensive, and I have said so many times.
My observation about you is that you tend to assume that people here need to answer for their anti-Mormon habits. You started out accusing me of incessantly hounding DCP in very strong and insulting terms. Then you had to back out of that when you discovered that your assumptions were incorrect.
Now you attack the one person here who regularly makes a big deal about not profaning the LDS temple in this forum on the grounds that he finds it offensive as though he were being inconsistent on this point. I police this very issue here, where the angry ex-Mormons like Shulem and Dr Exiled sometimes post temple images.
I hate that crap.
Pay attention and stop with the uninformed assumptions about me.
Otherwise I am going to start to suspect that you are nothing but a time-wasting troll.
I have indeed notice you take to task some of the more deranged attitudes (note: I said deranged attitudes, not deranged people) here, and I meant no offense. I am also not a fan of Kwaku or Midnight Mormons. As I've said before, there are way too many podcasts that have little to no substance (there are a few that are great, like Blair Hodge's "Fireside.")
I have indeed notice you take to task some of the more deranged attitudes (note: I said deranged attitudes, not deranged people) here, and I meant no offense. I am also not a fan of Kwaku or Midnight Mormons. As I've said before, there are way too many podcasts that have little to no substance (there are a few that are great, like Blair Hodge's "Fireside.")
Yes, we are agreed that there are too many podcasts with little substance. Blair Hodges' is definitely an exceptional choice. He is a decent fellow as well.
Now please refrain from implying I am a hypocrite until you have good cause to do so.
“The past no longer belongs only to those who once lived it; the past belongs to those who claim it, and are willing to
explore it, and to infuse it with meaning for those alive today.”—Margaret Atwood
Kishkumen wrote:
There is nothing to answer. It is not a question of wanting to answer anything or not. You made an empty accusation. You did not pose a hypothetical. I can’t and won’t get involved in what is a confused query with a dubious purpose.
I made no accusations and frankly don’t understand the defensiveness.
I have simply observed that, much like others here, you more frequently take umbrage when Mormons are naughty than you do when ex Mormons are naughty. I wondered why, and I asked.
I think more than anyone here, Kish is pretty consistent in his standards, irrespective of who is being naughty.
Seriously, Sledge. Maybe you should pay closer attention. I have REPEATEDLY almost the the point of OBSESSIVELY called people out for putting temple content in this forum. I find this material to be offensive, and I have said so many times.
My observation about you is that you tend to assume that people here need to answer for their anti-Mormon habits. You started out accusing me of incessantly hounding DCP in very strong and insulting terms. Then you had to back out of that when you discovered that your assumptions were incorrect.
Now you attack the one person here who regularly makes a big deal about not profaning the LDS temple in this forum on the grounds that he finds it offensive as though he were being inconsistent on this point. I police this very issue here, where the angry ex-Mormons like Shulem and Dr Exiled sometimes post temple images.
I hate that crap.
Pay attention and stop with the uninformed assumptions about me.
Otherwise I am going to start to suspect that you are nothing but a time-wasting troll.
I have indeed notice you take to task some of the more deranged attitudes (note: I said deranged attitudes, not deranged people) here, and I meant no offense. I am also not a fan of Kwaku or Midnight Mormons. As I've said before, there are way too many podcasts that have little to no substance (there are a few that are great, like Blair Hodge's "Fireside.")
Your perception of Kishkuman is dead wrong and shows more about your bias than his.
I have indeed notice you take to task some of the more deranged attitudes (note: I said deranged attitudes, not deranged people) here, and I meant no offense. I am also not a fan of Kwaku or Midnight Mormons. As I've said before, there are way too many podcasts that have little to no substance (there are a few that are great, like Blair Hodge's "Fireside.")
Your perception of Kishkuman is dead wrong and shows more about your bias than his.
Hang on, dude, what is wrong about my above statement?
I have indeed notice you take to task some of the more deranged attitudes (note: I said deranged attitudes, not deranged people) here, and I meant no offense. I am also not a fan of Kwaku or Midnight Mormons. As I've said before, there are way too many podcasts that have little to no substance (there are a few that are great, like Blair Hodge's "Fireside.")
Your perception of Kishkuman is dead wrong and shows more about your bias than his.
Hang on, dude, what is wrong about my above statement?
I made no accusations and frankly don’t understand the defensiveness.
I have simply observed that, much like others here, you more frequently take umbrage when Mormons are naughty than you do when ex Mormons are naughty. I wondered why, and I asked.
I have REPEATEDLY almost the the point of OBSESSIVELY called people out for putting temple content in this forum. I find this material to be offensive, and I have said so many times.