BishopRic wrote:harmony wrote:BishopRic wrote: From the pulpits, it is taught and encouraged. In the trenches of the community, it is not lived.
And this is the leaders' fault why?
Never said it was. BUT, I think an argument can be made that there could be vast improvements in the emphasis of true unconditional love. It has to be taught because the scriptures demand it. But the practice of it is the true barometer of how well it is taught.
I am a firm believer in the value of unconditional love. However, what I see repeatedly in the scriptures is conditional love. Which is one of the reasons why I am convinced that what we accept as canon is largely a regurgitation of the teachings of men. Very little is actually God-breathed.
Similarly, when one who lives a different lifestyle than the prescribed one is told "I love you, but I hate what you are doing," the true message is that they are NOT really accepted or loved unconditionally. This feeling of rejection leads to the many problems discussed in the movie -- drug abuse, suicide, depression...all very high statistics from "Happy Valley."
And yet those behaviors are rejected in the larger society also. Resulting in the same problems. I don't see how the problems in Utah can be blamed solely on the church, when society as a whole has the same problems. What is the reason that North Dakota is #2? Can't be the LDS church, that's for sure!
And to change the trend, I think it takes getting past the denial of the problem, and then a greater emphasis on living true unconditional love. And this starts with...the leaders!
Why would you think the church can influence Utah's problems to that extent? First, you have to prove the church is majorly responsible for those problems (the church... not Mormon culture, which is an entirely different animal). Then you have to show how changing the church will impact the problems. And that whole scenario would be difficult, since those same problems exist to a lesser and larger degree, depending on the problem, in other places in the country where the church is not a major influence on the culture.
I'd like to see a much greater emphasis by the leaders on living the gospel of Jesus Christ, rather than on what the church has decided is most important as reflected in the TRI questions. However, that will never happen as long as the leadership of the church suffers so significantly from one of the most important faults: pride. It's difficult to make changes, especially major changes, when the leaders never look inwardly to the source of the problem, but instead blame the followers. Taking responsibility for their personal faults isn't something LDS leaders do well, or often.