stemelbow wrote:True. I don't' see it anywhere. What's with this censorship around here? let's try to end ol' Simon's stay here by erasing his threads from time to time.
Of course if we were at the MDD board and this happened to a critic here, they'd throw a fit there, get banned, and then, come here and complain about how they hate the MDD board and everyone over there including the stupid critics who are just there to get the butts handed to them by LDS...or whatever. I think I nailed it. But we'll see some complaints about that for sure.
stemelbow wrote:True. I don't' see it anywhere. What's with this censorship around here? let's try to end ol' Simon's stay here by erasing his threads from time to time.
Of course if we were at the MDD board and this happened to a critic here, they'd throw a fit there, get banned, and then, come here and complain about how they hate the MDD board and everyone over there including the stupid critics who are just there to get the butts handed to them by LDS...or whatever. I think I nailed it. But we'll see some complaints about that for sure.
+1, stem!
Simon,
Now that you have stem, you only need three more 'dudes' to complete your 'posse' as pictured here
There is no verification that such a thread authored by you existed.
And don't blame me (which can usually be done, based on my general moderator inability to do things like merge threads), because I wasn't here.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
sock puppet wrote:Stumpy, once again you're wide and to the right.
Oh come on, sick puppy, keithb just started a thread that pretty much fits that very description. And the other critics here lauded him for it. What an adorable show you guys provide...can't even acknowledge when you're all being silly (as in I act like a child silly). Too bad. I feel for ya.
Love ya tons, Stem
I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
[MODERATOR NOTE: Your thread wasn't deleted. It duplicated the subject matter (and the title as well) of a thread already in progress, so I merged the two for readers' convenience.
Click here and you'll find your posts--and everyone else's posts--in that thread safe and sound in their non-deleted state.]
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Dr. Shades wrote:[MODERATOR NOTE: Your thread wasn't deleted. It duplicated the subject matter (and the title as well) of a thread already in progress, so I merged the two for readers' convenience.
Click here and you'll find your posts--and everyone else's posts--in that thread safe and sound in their non-deleted state.]
What say ye now, Stumpy and Simon? What about all those censorship cries?
An apology to Dr Shades by each of you is now in order.
