Blixa wrote:None of the above. Including images posted by others.
Ah c'mon! Not even Craig? He is The Man!
So here's a weird question: if a man gets sort of turned on by pretending he is someone else (i.e. Daniel Craig) while persuing his wife in a way someone else does it on the silver screen (i.e. James Bond), does he have porn in his mind per LDS definition?
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)
Blixa wrote:None of the above. Including images posted by others.
Please post your "ideal" Blixa.
If I were to guess, I would say this would do it for Blixa:
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)
Blixa wrote:Nope. I might find Paul Newman in Hud attractive, but that's a different thing entirely from a pornographic image.
I see what you mean, but have you read the LDS definition of pornography? I refer to that in this poll.
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)
Blixa wrote:Nope. I might find Paul Newman in Hud attractive, but that's a different thing entirely from a pornographic image.
Now I'm curious. What do you define as pornography?
Zeezrom straightened out that he meant this poll to reflect the very broad definition that seems a part of contemporary LDS culture (referring to young women as "walking pornography" is a quick example). I was using the more conventional definition: an aid to masturbation. Thinking a guy is hot and wanking off are two different activities on my planet.
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
Blixa wrote:Zeezrom straightened out that he meant this poll to reflect the very broad definition that seems a part of contemporary LDS culture (referring to young women as "walking pornography" is a quick example). I was using the more conventional definition: an aid to masturbation. Thinking a guy is hot and wanking off are two different activities on my planet.
Thank you. A sliver of insight into the feminine libido (still a mystery to me, even at my age).
There was a news story a few weeks ago about orthodox Jewish papers running an image of Obama and his cabinet, etc. watching the Bin Laden raid in "real time". They digitally removed Hillary and another lady from the image because any woman's image may lead to impure thoughts in the minds of it's readers.
Pornography must be in the eye of the beholder.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.
"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
Notoriously slippery to define. There is the old observation, I cannot define it but I know it when I see it. Those three images are not in the ball park. What the?
Blixa defination makes sense and is direct. I might be stubborn and insist that it also contains some implied disparagement of human sexuality. Enter room disrobe chug-a chug-a chug-a. I was going to add etc. but decided it was not approriate. I hear the formulae can be got up in fancy dress. Ok that's nice but i cannot see a connection to the images above.
