stemelbow ~ I don't understand the point of your reply in the slightest. However, I've never stated or even implied that Mormon women are "duped," so if you're trying to insinuate that I hold to such a view, I'll thank you to retract it.
Buffalo wrote:Yes, these are very fair points. However, it still beats out the complete arbitrary and unfair everlasting torture that my caricatured and ignorant portrayal of your version of God has in store for most of his creations.
Fix't.
To Anyone Else Who is Interested ~ There is not a single Christian view of eternity, heaven, hell, punishment, and sin. There isn't even an official organization that lays out "traditional Christian" beliefs on this matter that we can look to and say with authority, "this is what Christians teach on the matter," as we can with LDS teachings using materials promulgated by the LDS church. I'm but a single Christian and while I believe in hell, I don't believe in "arbitrary and unfair everlasting torture."
Buffalo has never asked me about my beliefs on the matter, so he speaks from ignorance when he makes assertions about what
I believe. I feel very confident that what
I personally believe is far from "inferior" to the LDS view.
Now, what many traditional Christians have taught and believed about hell, who goes there, and for what reasons
is inferior to the LDS view. Christian depictions of hell have sometimes been graphic, horrifying, and outright disturbing. That's not horribly surprising though. Mormonism came after Christianity, and as such it made an effort to improve on Christianity's perceived flaws (real or imagined). In doing so, it managed to add problems of its own that hadn't existed in traditional Christian theology, hence the point of my first post in this thread. I could envision someone trying to develop a new Mormon movement that improved on the flaws in the LDS version of the afterlife. (In fact, I think it's one of the major failings of some of the people who have recently claimed to be prophets for new LDS movements, such as Matthew Gill and his
Book of Jeraneck following, that they haven't tried to fill in and improve on the gaps in LDS theology, and why these movements don't have any real staying power.)
I don't care to have a conversation with
Buffalo on the matter because my past experiences with him have led me to conclude that he has little interest in sincerely understanding the beliefs of another. If anybody else is interested in this topic, let me know and I'll consider starting a thread in Celestial.