I'm a Woman?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_quark
_Emeritus
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:09 pm

Re: I'm a Woman?

Post by _quark »

asbestosman wrote:...you had a feminine style of writing.

Let's see... Scratch is a very good writer so yeah, I can see how Yahoo came up with that.
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Re: I'm a Woman?

Post by _asbestosman »

quark wrote:Let's see... Scratch is a very good writer so yeah, I can see how Yahoo came up with that.

I wonder how the scriptures would read if they were written by women.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_quark
_Emeritus
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:09 pm

Re: I'm a Woman?

Post by _quark »

asbestosman wrote:I wonder how the scriptures would read if they were written by women.

It would be a little easier to answer that question if we had any scriptures written by women. Maybe just a verse or two? I'm not asking for much here...

Might we consider De laudibus Christi or Cento virgilianus scripture?
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: I'm a Woman?

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Well, this explains a lot since you're a woman:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... order.html

Get off the meds, Madame.

-VRDRC
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_Simon Belmont

Re: I'm a Woman?

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Oh, hey! Another DCP thread!

Surprise, surprise.

And what's his supposed crime this time? Using the wrong gender pronoun in reference to an androgynous, anonymous pseudonym on the Internet?

The horror!
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: I'm a Woman?

Post by _Kishkumen »

Simon Belmont wrote:Using the wrong gender pronoun in reference to an androgynous, anonymous pseudonym on the Internet?

The horror!


You really are a moron, Simon. How does an online persona that formerly went at Mister Scratch and uses the image of an aged, male actor with a beard qualify as "androgynous"? If only you could get a brain transplant.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Simon Belmont

Re: I'm a Woman?

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Kishkumen wrote:You really are a moron, Simon. How does an online persona that formerly went at Mister Scratch and uses the image of an aged, male actor with a beard qualify as "androgynous"? If only you could get a brain transplant.


Doctors can be both men and women + Scratch is not a real name = androgynous pseudonym.

I don't appreciate the name calling.
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: I'm a Woman?

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Thank you for your remarks on this thread, Elder F. I know that you can always be counted on--without question, it seems--to show up on each and every thread in which DCP is mentioned.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: I'm a Woman?

Post by _Kishkumen »

Simon Belmont wrote:Doctors can be both men and women + Scratch is not a real name = androgynous pseudonym.

I don't appreciate the name calling.


By such standards almost any one of our personae could be considered "androgynous." Please sharpen your critical thinking skills. There: that is not name calling.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Simon Belmont

Re: I'm a Woman?

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Kishkumen wrote:By such standards almost any one of our personae could be considered "androgynous." Please sharpen your critical thinking skills. There: that is not name calling.


That is correct.

Your point?
Post Reply