Kishkumen wrote:After all, he might slap something together at the last moment, or simply transcribe his presentation from 2010 or whenever, and meet the lofty standards of the Mormon Interpreter quite handily.
Hold on there Reverend, that's a peer-reviewed journal you're talking about and you can't just assume that good as his paper might have been for a FAIR presentation in 2010, that it will make the cut for Interpreter. The spine on the hardbound edition of that baby rivals anything I've got from the Franklin Library.
December 1st, or very soon thereafter, is the time of year wherein Doctor Scratch posts his annual "Top Ten Happenings in Mopologetics, 20xx Edition" thread.
I hope you're still able to earn a living.
??? Why wouldn't I be?
I don't see the connection. Please help?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Kishkumen wrote:After all, he might slap something together at the last moment, or simply transcribe his presentation from 2010 or whenever, and meet the lofty standards of the Mormon Interpreter quite handily.
Hold on there Reverend, that's a peer-reviewed journal you're talking about and you can't just assume that good as his paper might have been for a FAIR presentation in 2010, that it will make the cut for Interpreter. The spine on the hardbound edition of that baby rivals anything I've got from the Franklin Library.
Excellent point, Dean Robbers. Powerpoints don't easily translate into the medium of faux-leather-bound volumes. I defer to your wisdom.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
I'm merely referring to the fact that you apparently spend a lot of time on this sort of thing. It's not like I've sent the Danites to sabotage your employment.....
