subgenius wrote:No, what he is saying is what is exactly what you quoted...what you "think" he is saying is that other absurdity about rock ownership you write in order to "spin" his words for some desperate political position. But good to know that if someone is assaulting you with rocks you believe you do not have a right to use a firearm to defend your life...kinda makes your rebel uprising unfavored in the over/under for successful revolution.
He said, and I quote:
"there's not much difference when you get hit in the face with a rock," which means he is the dumbest damned President in history for this statement alone, and you're the dumbest damned person on the internet today for defending his remark.
But, of the thousands of people estimated to have been traveling with the caravan at the time, officials believed that only 20 percent would likely make it to the U.S. border, based on historical analysis.
To put this into perspective, if the U.S. had estimated that around 7,000 migrants were traveling toward the border with the caravan as of October 25, then it would have also determined that fewer than 1,500 would be likely to make it to the country’s ports of entry. The intelligence assessment was still being briefed to commanders as of October 27, according to the documents.
I'm reminded of the Bonus Army march of the Great Depression years. Days of glory for Eisenhower, MacArthur and Patton when they got to burn the sheds of hungry veterans and drive them from their encampments at gunpoint.
subgenius wrote:No, what he is saying is what is exactly what you quoted...what you "think" he is saying is that other absurdity about rock ownership you write in order to "spin" his words for some desperate political position. But good to know that if someone is assaulting you with rocks you believe you do not have a right to use a firearm to defend your life...kinda makes your rebel uprising unfavored in the over/under for successful revolution.
He said, and I quote:
"there's not much difference when you get hit in the face with a rock," which means he is the dumbest damned President in history for this statement alone, and you're the dumbest damned person on the internet today for defending his remark.
was not defending anybody's remark, just commenting on the ignorance of your position and the absurdity of your post. But i like how the "dumbest f***ing President in history" defeated the best candidate the Democrats could put forth.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
You haven't demonstrated any ignorance or absurdity, only demonstrated your undying willingness to be a Trump apologist. Jesus H Christ, does your wife know about your addiction to worshipping such a moral derelict?
subgenius wrote:But i like how the "dumbest f***ing President in history" defeated the best candidate the Democrats could put forth.
The EC is funny like that. But the poor fellow still fell 3 million votes short of what Hillary Clinton got. He couldn’t even make himself more popular amongst the people than the most hated Democratic candidate in recent memory. ; )
subgenius wrote:But i like how the "dumbest f***ing President in history" defeated the best candidate the Democrats could put forth.
The EC is funny like that. But the poor fellow still fell 3 million votes short of what Hillary Clinton got. He couldn’t even make himself more popular amongst the people than the most hated Democratic candidate in recent memory. ; )
We already stipulated the dumb part...whats dumber is he, or she, who doesn't know how ( or why) a President gets elected.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
canpakes wrote:The EC is funny like that. But the poor fellow still fell 3 million votes short of what Hillary Clinton got. He couldn’t even make himself more popular amongst the people than the most hated Democratic candidate in recent memory. ; )
We already stipulated the dumb part...whats dumber is he, or she, who doesn't know how ( or why) a President gets elected.
When you find that person, you can explain that to him or her. In the meantime, Trump will always know that people were more supportive of Hillary than him. He had to make up stories of 3 million illegal voters to help nurse his wounded ego. It was a fitting first tantrum to set the tone for his Presidency.
All in all, a successful start for America's first affirmative action program for orange folks.