It could be because those states have a lot of people in them. But I like your logic that voting democrat is a risk factor for Covid-19.
Kewl, and I like you refrained from using logic in your counterpoint. The top 10 states in the US for population (a.k.a. a lot of people) are:
1. California
2. Texas
3. Florida
4. New York
5. Pennsylvania
6. Illinois
7. Ohio
8. Georgia
9. North Carolina
10. Michigan
Seems like both Blue and Red states have a "lot of people in them" yet the list remains as is....and this doesn't propose causation in lieu of correlation...in fact, logic dictates that upon reading the graphic perhaps it is considering that "almost as if" its an open defiance to Trump etc...So yeah, it could be because a lot of people chose something instead of something else.
It could be because those states have a lot of people in them. But I like your logic that voting democrat is a risk factor for Covid-19.
Kewl, and I like you refrained from using logic in your counterpoint. The top 10 states in the US for population (a.k.a. a lot of people) are:
1. California
2. Texas
3. Florida
4. New York
5. Pennsylvania
6. Illinois
7. Ohio
8. Georgia
9. North Carolina
10. Michigan
Seems like both Blue and Red states have a "lot of people in them" yet the list remains as is....and this doesn't propose causation in lieu of correlation...in fact, logic dictates that upon reading the graphic perhaps it is considering that "almost as if" its an open defiance to Trump etc...So yeah, it could be because a lot of people chose something instead of something else.
All 10 of those states have had a lot of deaths, presumably because they all have a lot of people. I never said the deaths should correlate exactly to population. I would simply expect to see the more populous states at the top of the list and the least populous states at the bottom, and that's what we have. But lets look at whatever theory you're trying to push. California is the bluest of blue states, and it's the most populous state, yet it's not in the top 5. Illinois is also a super blue state with a huge population but not in the top 5. Both Michigan and Pennsylvania voted for Trump in 2016, and they are in your top 5. So what's your theory?
subs, so you agree with the sentiment expressed in Mitchell’s tweet that folks in blue states are purposefully dying from COVID-19 in order to spite Trump, then? : D
That’s some seriously high-level tin-foil hattery. Kind of like your other belief in pizza parlor pedo rings run by Deep State grandmothers.
subs, so you agree with the sentiment expressed in Mitchell’s tweet that folks in blue states are purposefully dying from COVID-19 in order to spite Trump, then? : D
That’s some seriously high-level tin-foil hattery. Kind of like your other belief in pizza parlor pedo rings run by Deep State grandmothers.
Is that the theory? This is subgenius's theory:
logic dictates that upon reading the graphic perhaps it is considering that "almost as if" its an open defiance to Trump etc...So yeah, it could be because a lot of people chose something instead of something else.
My understanding of of 30 and 70 percent is that as the number of people immune to the virus increases the virus finds it harder to locate new hosts. The virus needs new hosts to maintain its population. As immunity approaches 70 percent of possible hosts then the virus population starts shrinking making it harder for that population to locate new victims. Virus population crash results leaving the 30 percent safe.
Clearly there is advantage to reaching 70% immunity by way of vaccine.
Did you cut off the Twitter name at the top of this tweet because you don’t want anyone to see that you use Bill Mitchell as a source?
Bill Mitchell. Incredible
The crop wasn't intentional whereas your ignorance to dispute facts or assertions simply based upon source is all to intentional. Which is why your post can be dismissed and now possibly elevates Bill Mitchell.
Then there are those unfortunate cases of folks publicly posting about how COVID-19 is a hoax, then contracting the virus and dying from it, which is an altogether separate phenomenon than what subs is trying to inoculate against.