Christmas Housecleaning at MADB

Post by **_Moniker** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:41 am

Oh Coggies, I thought you despised intellectuals?

I'll try again, later.

kfja;sfaspodifasfkasd

Post by **_beastie** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:43 am

Or perhaps all the couple has to do to find connubial bliss is to pray beforehand, and the Holy Ghost will direct their endeavors. Because, you know, God forbids an individual to explore and get to know his/her own body, so it must be up to HIM to tell them what to do.

Post by **_Moniker** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:45 am

beastie wrote:Or perhaps all the couple has to do to find connubial bliss is to pray beforehand, and the Holy Ghost will direct their endeavors. Because, you know, God forbids an individual to explore and get to know his/her own body, so it must be up to HIM to tell them what to do.

Oh! That's hawt! A 3-some! Woo doggies -- you LDS are kinky!

Post by **_beastie** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:46 am

Moniker, for the last time, the Church has no teaching such that sexual urges are not appropriate. Sexual urges, if allowed to fester, grow, and take control of one's thoughts are not appropriate because sexual expression outside of marriage is not appropriate, and thoughts lead to behavior. The urges themselves are not in question.

Yeah, we see. Sexual urges, as long as they are immediately suppressed, are not inappropriate. But ya gotta zap 'em as soon as they pop up, because otherwise you may actually touch your own body. And Jesus really, really hates that.

Post by **_Moniker** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:48 am

Oh dear! I just feel silly this evening. My apologies to all -- except Coggins. No apology for you!

Post by **_Coggins7** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:53 am

Yeah, we see. Sexual urges, as long as they are immediately suppressed, are not inappropriate. But ya gotta zap 'em as soon as they pop up, because otherwise you may actually touch your own body. And Jesus really, really hates that.

Whatever he may think, you may never know, one way or the other. So, as a confirmed secualarist, you are free to do what all other secularists have always done: make it up as you go along, and as expediency dictates.

If you can work yourself into the same horny froth as moniker, you will be able to "not think too much about it" as she does.

Post by **_Moniker** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:00 am

Coggins7 wrote:
Yeah, we see. Sexual urges, as long as they are immediately suppressed, are not inappropriate. But ya gotta zap 'em as soon as they pop up, because otherwise you may actually touch your own body. And Jesus really, really hates that.

Whatever he may think, you may never know, one way or the other. So, as a confirmed secualarist, you are free to do what all other secularists have always done: make it up as you go along, and as expediency dictates.

If you can work yourself into the same horny froth as moniker, you will be able to "not think too much about it" as she does.

Oop! My tag line? Hahaa! What in the world is there to think about? I don't get you Coggins. You're denying that people are shamed (what is a confession Coggins?) for being aroused and wanting to masturbate. I think it's pretty simple, sorry you don't. I don't give your bogglywooglywackocrapoweirdonutball sex talk much credence (or thought) because it just seems bizarre. Sex = simple. Religion/sex == complicates something that need not be so complex.

Post by **_beastie** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:22 am

Whatever he may think, you may never know, one way or the other. So, as a confirmed secualarist, you are free to do what all other secularists have always done: make it up as you go along, and as expediency dictates.

If you can work yourself into the same horny froth as moniker, you will be able to "not think too much about it" as she does.

Oh, you mean you're one of those liberal, cafeteria Mormon who thinks it's actually OK to touch your own body?

(psst, moniker, wanna take bets that coggins is one of "those" good LDS boys who enjoys a dose of private titillation in conversations of these sort? I'm going with a big YES after his description of you)

Post by **_Dr. Shades** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:22 pm

Blixa wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:The remedy is simple. Teach them to find the clitoris, and all will be well.

While that's a step in the right direction, it's not a panic button.

In that case, there's always the G-spot.

Post by **_Moniker** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:12 pm

beastie wrote:(psst, moniker, wanna take bets that coggins is one of "those" good LDS boys who enjoys a dose of private titillation in conversations of these sort? I'm going with a big YES after his description of you)

He did have a rather "froth"y burst of creativity last evening. :)