MormonDiscussions.com: Guide To

[_John Larsen]

But I really think this is Bob-a-job's doing.

The guy's not a believer, and I'm not that funny, nor do I have the time.

Once again, your statement contains no denial.

[_rcrocket]

I've denied it several times.

[_Yoda]

I've denied it several times.

No one here would have even known about the blog if you hadn't conveniently brought it to our attention.

Since your time is so "limited" on the Internet, how did you happen to "come across it"?

Do you routinely do searches plugging in "Mormon Discussions"?

[_beastie]

The guy's not a believer, and I'm not that funny, nor do I have the time.

William Schryver’s first entry said, paraphrasing, that if his Book of Abraham apologetics was the best there was to offer, Justin would have to revert to his view that the Book of Abraham was speculative fiction. These are not the words of a nonbeliever.

in my opinion, the entry on crocket sounds exactly like what crocket would say if he were trying to criticize himself. I think that someone else would have been far more likely to point out what a lightweight he is in terms of substantial argument - and, of course, what critic wouldn’t mention the “anonymous coward blahblahblah” bit?

Another “tell” is calling me “shrill”. That is exactly the type of thing someone with somewhat dismissive attitudes toward women would say. How many men are described as “shrill”?

In other words – my money’s still on bob.

[_marg]

In other words – my money’s still on bob.

The punctuation used is the same as Bob's and what reason would Bob have of registering as Justin..it's Bob.

[_The Dude]

Another “tell” is calling me “shrill”. That is exactly the type of thing someone with somewhat dismissive attitudes toward women would say. How many men are described as “shrill”?

It's the kind of thing Republican men say about Hillary Clinton.

I just looked at the blog and noticed the formatting is gone. What a mess. One big paragraph. There's also a new "Toughness" rating. Cool that I got a 10 for Toughness.

Beastie only got a 5 for Toughness. Whatever! Again, that's like saying Hillary Clinton isn't all that tough.

[_beastie]

It's the kind of thing Republican men say about Hillary Clinton.

I just looked at the blog and noticed the formatting is gone. What a mess. One big paragraph. There's also a new "Toughness" rating. Cool that I got a 10 for Toughness.

Beastie only got a 5 for Toughness. Whatever! Again, that's like saying Hillary Clinton isn't all that tough.

Bob claims to be a democrat that supported Hillary Clinton. Of course, he's bound to be a socially conservative democrat. Predictably, he denies that he's got a dismissive attitude toward women. But he has too many "tells" giving that one away, even if he supported Hillary.

[_Yoda]

Bob's profile on the blog in question now reads the following:

rcrocket: LDS Knowledge: 9 Trustworthiness: 9 Toughness: 7 One of the most capable posters. People fear him.

Boasting, Bob?

[_beastie]

rcrocket: LDS Knowledge: 9 Trustworthiness: 9 Toughness: 7 One of the most capable posters. People fear him.

No doubt. Someone who insisted the Maya had no writing is, indeed, a capable poster who makes me shake in my boots.

[_harmony]

He gave me a 9 for toughness? Holy Sheep Shorts, Batman!