harmony wrote:so because he behaved badly in the past, we can behave badly now?
I don't agree... not surprisingly.
You and anyone else here? I don't speak for any of you.
For me, absolutely. Why should I play by your rules or his rules? “F” his rules and “F” him. He's a pompous narcissistic prick who really needs a good ass kicking.
I will do everything I can to follow DCP into every depth he goes - and publish it. Expose him to the world, his peers, his employers, and his cultish handlers. I hate him with extreme prejudice and I will piss on his grave the day he dies.
I think posts should have been allowed to stay up, we all know who DCP is his gaffe was broadcast to the world.
DCP deleting his Facebook account and applying pressure here to remove evidence is simply him establishing a basis on which he can claim it never happened.
One does simply click on a video about boners and hot booty shaking action.
Though this escapade DCP seems something that should added to Wikipedia article on DCP.
Infymus wrote:Do I have to remind everyone about Daniel Peterson, PRIVATE emails, publication on a website called SHIELDS using real names, real emails, and full email contents - leading to the loss of potential employment - all done by one Daniel C. Peterson?
Screw Daniel's privacy AND his job.
so because he behaved badly in the past, we can behave badly now?
I don't agree... not surprisingly.
And the FAIRisees and MADites do not agree with you Liz. It is well documented that they base their conduct on the way they are treated. The manner of conduct of alleged upstanding.g LDS has been discussed several times on MDDB.
Doctor Scratch wrote:And that's interesting that you say "Daniel Peterson being the friend that he is to Ray...." Ray had given me the impression that he hadn't been in contact with DCP for a long, long time.
Not that this is significant. It's just interesting--that's all.
In his recent defenses of Daniel here, Ray has referred to Daniel as his friend. I don't know that this means they have been in personal communication over these things. They very well may not have been.
Also, the Reverend did not feel like you were criticizing him.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
Infymus wrote:For me, absolutely. Why should I play by your rules or his rules? “F” his rules and “F” him. He's a pompous narcissistic prick who really needs a good ass kicking.
I will do everything I can to follow DCP into every depth he goes - and publish it. Expose him to the world, his peers, his employers, and his cultish handlers. I hate him with extreme prejudice and I will piss on his grave the day he dies.
I can understand the anger. DCP is one of the worst Mormons I've ever confronted -- and there are a great many nasty Mormons out there who are locked into deception and tricks in effort to defend their hopeless revelations and truth claims that has been proven positively wrong (Facsimile No. 3).
DCP won't be alive too long because he's overweight and puts too much stress on his heart with his activities in attacking others. He will likely be dead inside of 10 years, 15 tops. Then you can piss on his grave. All the crap that DCP spit out on the Internet will forever mark his name and in a generation he will be remembered as a nasty LDS apologist that future Mormons will be ashamed of. His name will go down as a bad mark in Mormonism. I predict this because bad people are not remembered in good ways.
I'm sorry to say that I just don't think he's an honest man. But I really don't wish to go on and on about it. Just stating my opinion for record. Should I ever get the opportunity to visit his future grave I will leave a copy of Facsimile No. 3 at his graveside.
I posted on this and the previous thread with my opinion that the personal information from Dan's wall should be removed. There are many dynamics at play to have something like that on his wall and I think Shades and/or Liz made the right decision. When it comes to details of someone's personal life I think it's always better to err on the side of letting too little information out rather than too much.
That being said I made my initial request based upon the assumption that this was a post only available to Friends of Dan's and therefore there was a expectation of privacy. My assumption was wrong and as I've now read that his wall postings were public. As a public figure and a public posting I can completely see the side of those here saying that such information should be fair game.
Webster's defines boner as "a clumsy or stupid mistake". In the video Pitbull may have made a very public boner. But in our personal life we all should have a reasonable expectation that most of our boners will be kept private.
sock puppet wrote:It's good that Barack Obama is not registered here,
You don't know that.
Ah Darth J quoting the old Mormon go to phrase
You don't know that, Nobody knows for sure, You weren't there. Which interpreted means Our version is true and your version or the truth is a lie especially if it shows Mormonism in a bad light.
Doctor Scratch wrote:So.... He stopped emailing you, and you decided that you would be more critical of him?
I'm really not that petty, and I don't know why you grow all these assumptions. I have some "weird" friends at both ends of the spectrum, who include Kish and Will Schryver. They both have qualities I admire, for different reasons, and they both have differences with me on various matters. If we could all talk more in real life, I think there would be less disagreements, and on message boards those disagreements tend to be exaggerated. And now for something more important - what shall I have for breakfast? Hmmm.
