Cause of my Tanner Kerfuffle

[Marcus]

Markk and Kish, you guys are two of my favorite posters here. One thing that might help cool the jets a little is to remember that a person's beliefs can change drastically over time.

I'm a prime example of how beliefs can and do change when confronted with new evidence. For example, 5 years ago I firmly believed the Afore was nothing more than an arrogant, dishonest blowhard. Now I firmly believe the Afore is an arrogant dishonest, plagiarizing, homophobic and antisemitic blowhard with sociopathic tendencies.

New evidence does wonders, no??

[Markk]

It is even a larger responsibility existence to just type drive by snarky insults about folks as a yes man for your tribe, without the ability and/or compacity to back up your ignorant accusations and comments....or offer original thought on a discussion forum largely designed for arguments by critics of.... faith, politics, religion, sex, gender, and generally, opposing interests of life.

It’s boring watching you fail to appreciate one of the cleverest and funnest posters on this board in your usual tedious, ham-handed way.

What is funny and not boring is watching you implode. I can't tell you how much your posting reminds me of the old days telling the Mopologists about the failed truth claims and history of the church, that ironically the church now admits as true.

"your boring"....or "you don't understand" or "I already told you" .....all the while ducking a open two way conversation about their assertions about others.

As far as Moksha, I could not disagree more and stand by what I wrote, lets see if he can actually enter into a conversation and back up what he wrote.

If not, you two can tell each other cleaver jokes, because neither of you want to expound on or back up any or your assertions. Or maybe invite him on Whine with Kish, that would be a hoot. You can put on tweed jackets with elbow patches, break out your pipes, and have the discussion of "Tapir, horse or myth." But I do give credit to Moksha, he does not pretend to know everything, and does not think he is the final word on all things Mormon.

[Kishkumen]

What is funny and not boring is watching you implode. I can't tell you how much your posting reminds me of the old days telling the Mopologists about the failed truth claims and history of the church, that ironically the church now admits as true.

The one common element here is you and your poor reading skills.

"your boring"....or "you don't understand" or "I already told you" .....all the while ducking a open two way conversation about their assertions about others.

Yeah, well, you ARE boring, you DON’T understand, and I HAVE already told you. None of those things is the least bit untrue, so I don’t know what to say. I haven’t ducked an open, two-way conversation. We are having one. You just imagine that if a conversation doesn’t happen on your terms alone and to your personal satisfaction, then it’s not “open.”

As far as Moksha, I could not disagree more and stand by what I wrote, lets see if he can actually enter into a conversation and back up what he wrote.

I doubt he’ll waste his time on you, which proves in spades that he is smarter than the both of us combined.

If not, you two can tell each other cleaver jokes, because neither of you want to expound on or back up any or your assertions. Or maybe invite him on Whine with Kish, that would be a hoot. You can put on tweed jackets with elbow patches, break out your pipes, and have the discussion of "Tapir, horse or myth." But I do give credit to Moksha, he does not pretend to know everything, and does not think he is the final word on all things Mormon.

He also doesn’t think professing to be a blue-collar doofus serves as a blanket excuse for behaving like an entitled a-hole.

[Markk]

What is funny and not boring is watching you implode. I can't tell you how much your posting reminds me of the old days telling the Mopologists about the failed truth claims and history of the church, that ironically the church now admits as true.

The one common element here is you and your poor reading skills.

"your boring"....or "you don't understand" or "I already told you" .....all the while ducking a open two way conversation about their assertions about others.

Yeah, well, you ARE boring, you DON’T understand, and I HAVE already told you. None of those things is the least bit untrue, so I don’t know what to say. I haven’t ducked an open, two-way conversation. We are having one. You just imagine that if a conversation doesn’t happen on your terms alone and to your personal satisfaction, then it’s not “open.”

As far as Moksha, I could not disagree more and stand by what I wrote, lets see if he can actually enter into a conversation and back up what he wrote.

I doubt he’ll waste his time on you, which proves in spades that he is smarter than the both of us combined.

If not, you two can tell each other cleaver jokes, because neither of you want to expound on or back up any or your assertions. Or maybe invite him on Whine with Kish, that would be a hoot. You can put on tweed jackets with elbow patches, break out your pipes, and have the discussion of "Tapir, horse or myth." But I do give credit to Moksha, he does not pretend to know everything, and does not think he is the final word on all things Mormon.

He also doesn’t think professing to be a blue-collar doofus serves as a blanket excuse for behaving like an entitled a-hole.

Like I wrote implode Kish.

Lol...I have to ask....I get I am a a-hole, but how am I entitled? I'll hang up and listen.

[Kishkumen]

Lol...I have to ask....I get I am a a-hole, but how am I entitled? I'll hang up and listen.

Get a dictionary, open it to e, which comes after d and before f. There you will be able to find the word entitled. Read the definition, and think about it in the context of the rest of my comments in the same post, which touches on a theme I have raised repeatedly over the course of your autoerotic posting spree.

[Markk]

Lol...I have to ask....I get I am a a-hole, but how am I entitled? I'll hang up and listen.

Get a dictionary, open it to e, which comes after d and before f. There you will be able to find the word entitled. Read the definition, and think about it in the context of the rest of my comments in the same post, which touches on a theme I have raised repeatedly over the course of your autoerotic posting spree.

LOL I understand the definition, but my question was and is how am I entitled?

[Kishkumen]

LOL I understand the definition, but my question was and is how am I entitled?

Think for yourself, Markk. I already told you. I can see why you left Mormonism. You needed something a lot less mentally demanding.

[Markk]

LOL I understand the definition, but my question was and is how am I entitled?

Think for yourself, Markk. I already told you. I can see why you left Mormonism. You needed something a lot less mentally demanding.

So please Dr Peterson, dumb it down for me, given your superior intellect; why I am entitled?

But yes I found something much less demanding, Grace. I can be who I am, and I no longer have to pretend to be something I know I can never be. And I can have Hope, without again, pretending to be something I am not. I have a hard enough time managing my family, home and Job, let along worlds with out end as you appear to still hang onto. Right or wrong, it is awesome, and I can tell you what I believe without having to hide my belief, as you are doing.

But again in this last post of yours you seem to be defending Mormonism once again? Another cryptic hint. Why did you leave Mormonism, or have you?

[Philo Sofee]

It’s boring watching you fail to appreciate one of the cleverest and funnest posters on this board in your usual tedious, ham-handed way.

What is funny and not boring is watching you implode. I can't tell you how much your posting reminds me of the old days telling the Mopologists about the failed truth claims and history of the church, that ironically the church now admits as true.

"your boring"....or "you don't understand" or "I already told you" .....all the while ducking a open two way conversation about their assertions about others.

As far as Moksha, I could not disagree more and stand by what I wrote, lets see if he can actually enter into a conversation and back up what he wrote.

If not, you two can tell each other cleaver jokes, because neither of you want to expound on or back up any or your assertions. Or maybe invite him on Whine with Kish, that would be a hoot. You can put on tweed jackets with elbow patches, break out your pipes, and have the discussion of "Tapir, horse or myth." But I do give credit to Moksha, he does not pretend to know everything, and does not think he is the final word on all things Mormon.

I have never... and I mean NEVER seen or heard Kishkumen even hint of this, let alone say this. Your hyperbole is getting away from you.

[Marcus]

... I can see why you left Mormonism. You needed something a lot less mentally demanding...

Seriously, on this board you're going to try that???
That's a complete and utter fail as an insult.