Everybody Wang Chung wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 4:44 pmSeeing the post pop up everywhere on social media. Not sure if it’s accurate:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025 ... verything/The alleged assassin behind Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk’s death on September 10 is described by a friend as being “pretty left on everything,” according to a report from the Guardian.
A high school friend of 22-year-old Utah resident Tyler Robinson who “asked to remain anonymous” told the outlet that while Robinson’s family were “very hard Republican,” Robinson was “the only member of his family that was really leftist.”
Robinson was described as becoming “more extreme in his political views” around his sophomore year, the friend told the outlet:
In a phone interview on Friday, one of Tyler Robinson’s high school friends, who asked to remain anonymous, said that the suspect was “pretty left on everything” and was “the only member of his family that was really leftist.”
“The rest of his family was very hard Republican,” the friend said.
Around sophomore year, the friend said, Robinson became more extreme in his political views and would “always just be ranting and arguing about them.”
Breitbart News’s AWR Hawkins reported that during a press conference announcing Robinson’s capture, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox (R) noted that the assassin would be charged and “held accountable.”
“There is one person responsible for what happened here, and that person is now in custody and will be charged soon and will be held accountable,” Cox said.
Cox also revealed that “on the evening of September 11, a family member of Tyler Robinson reached out to a family friend who contacted the Washington County Sheriff’s Office with information that Robinson had confessed to them or implied that he had committed the incident.”
In addition to this we know that Lance Twigg was Tyler Robinson's gay or furry boyfriend. Lance is the guy who Tyler texted to go get the gun he used to kill Charlie Kirk out of the wooded area and hide it. Lance didn't say anything about this until authorities confronted him. So just as I said, and as every rational thinking person should have known almost immediately, Charlie Kirk's assassin was a Democrat and radical leftist ideologue homosexual, just like the last three mass shooters. His lover who was willing to keep his secret from the police is transitioning from a man into a woman. His family who were conservative Mormons turned him in. If Tyler Robinson wasn't radicalized in his semester in college, he was radicalized online in groups full of people similar to the people here. Yes you, Everyone Wang Chung, who claims that Charlie Kirk was violent to the people who have been dancing on his grave and cursing his memory because he made political statements throughout his life (many of which are circulating are also lies or half truths) that leftists didn't agree with. Why are we seeing a rise in radical leftwing terrorism? It's because of the permission structure the left gives to it's violent factions. If you say homosexuality is a sin, than that is considered violence and it's reasonable that those offended by this view should answer with violence by striking first violently. What about when a black man, let out of jail after 14 arrests and several convictions, kills a white Ukrainian woman for no apparent reason. (Reports say DeCarlos claims Irina called him the dreaded (N word) which the left clearly believes merits a violent response. Of course DeCalros was lying. But he knew what to say to gain sympathy from the leftists judges and juries. Now his lawyer will probably try to claim that it is societies fault for failure to provide sufficient social welfare programs and mental health treatment facilities (like they would ever protect society from him). Another group for which the mainstream Democrat party provides a permission structure for violence are the radical Marxists, who claim that the only way to solve the problem of wealth inequality is to murder all the rich conservatives (defined as any conservative who owns more than one vehicle) and redistribute the wealth, Animal farm style! We know that Bernie Sanders, Barack Obama, or Zoram Mamdani would never be defined as rich. Then of course there is the last faction of the Democrat party which mainstream Democrats have sought to provide a permission structure for violence, radical Islamic terrorists.
The same people saying that you have to respect freedom of speech for those who want to dance on Charlie Kirk's grave are the same people that banned Donald Trump and conservatives from Twitter because they claim he offered a permission structure to capital rioters, who ultimately contrary to leftists lies killed no one at the capital that day. So when people ask why can't a leftist celebrate Charlie Kirks murder if they have the first amendment right to do so, I say that the first amendment has already been violated for any conservative attempting to post on social media. Whatever social contract existed before is in breach. And until one side shows some contrition and willingness to enforce the first amendment in a nonpartisan manner, then I see no problem with applying the first amendment to Marxists, violent reverse racists, and radical Islamic terrorists, in the same way they've applied it to us under the same way they've twisted the constitution.
