OK. I hear what you’re saying. I suppose when it comes right down to it I find it simply illogical that this (life) all exists for nothing...except for what we make it. That it doesn’t continue. That this thing we call soul/mind is nothing more than, well, nothing...when all is said and done. When the EKG flatlines, it’s over.honorentheos wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2020 9:53 pmThis also seems wrong. Life didn't evolve "into" consciousness. The apparent science/philosophy of mind current suggests conciousness is an emergent quality that comes about from different regions of the brain interacting. The brain appears to be a hive of varied voices and information exchange. States of consciousness appear to increase or decrease relative to that chatter. During general anesthesia it seems like the regions of the brain are cycling in a wave such that the regions aren't able to communicate. This implies that inside of what you imagine is a single consciousness are infact numerous consciousnesses. I offered up an example of a split brain patient who clearly because two different people inside one body when the hemispheres of the brain were prevented from talking to one another.mentalgymnast wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2020 8:25 pmI think it is literally a miracle (hand of God) that life evolved into consciousness.
Consciousness is certainly a miracle. And I love the effects of it that include wonder, aesthetic appreciation, give additional meaning to social relationships, bring burdens and challenges, and all that it includes that makes us human. But that's not an argument for the Christian-Judeo God. It's a wonder.
When the existence of a creator God can’t be proved one way or the other and there are valid reasons to believe and valid reasons to disbelieve I find belief to be more satisfying both intellectually and spiritually.
Belief in the Judeo-Christian God does present questions that can keep one up late at night. As I’ve said before, it’s my belief/hope in the Book of Mormon as an artifact/evidence of God interacting with people in different dispensations of time that keeps me centered in my belief/hope in Jesus Christ as being more than a myth. The Book of Mormon is keystone. But I think I’ve repeated that ad nauseam in these parts.
I’m a lay person when it comes to science and scientific research. But I absolutely look at science as our friend, not enemy. But the fact is, there are smart people on both sides of the belief vs. non-belief divide. If the evidence was super persuasive one way or the other I think there would have been a winner by now. As it is, there are valid reasons for belief and valid reasons for non-belief. Personally I find it much more satisfying to practice belief and keep my options open. Disbelief, in my opinion, closes doors to further investigation. Once one has taken the hardline position to say there is no creator God then one is limited in their investigations. They already know the ‘truth’. On the other hand, if one chooses religious practice and/or belief the options are not as limited. One can fully explore and consider all sides of the various facets of investigative adventures without having to become a hardliner. Religious belief for most of us is materially dependent on faith/hope anyway. Pretty hard to be a hardliner.
Life is richer because there are more things to be explored without limitations.
I can look at the three books I brought up in the OP as being interesting ‘evidences’ that MAY point towards faith in God/Christ and the restoration. You and others that take a hardliner approach and align themselves with secular humanism have placed yourselves in a box filled with limitations. And you’re always having to be on the defensive. I don’t have to be. I will typically take a defensive position as a matter of course, but at the end of the day I’m still left with faith/hope.
I don’t know for a fact that I’m 100% right in my positions and/or beliefs. From what I can see you are pretty much obligated to take a hardline position with no open doors for belief...unless, of course, your demands on a theoretical god are met according to pre-existing conditions...otherwise “I will not believe “.
Whew! Yeah. I think I’ve probably said all there is to say on my end this time around.
Best wishes,
MG