Apostacy big winner at oscars

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Ray A

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Ray A »

So once again, Jersey, I ask you:

Have you read Who Really Wrote The Book of Mormon?????

Here is my educated guess: NO!
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Ray A wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
How about put yourself to a test and shut the f*** up?


So once again, please note. This is the genius behind calling marg to moderate the Spalding thread, and what does she have to say?

Shut the f*** up!

Two. peas. in. a. pod.

Dictators. Don't challenge Spalding - Shut up!!


Had the current posting your replying to been anything remotely resembling a post regarding the Spalding theory and/or thread one might accept the above as being a relevant response. Sadly, that is not to be.

Here Ray,

I'll make this simple for you. Whenever you feel the urge to reply to marg or others with off topic and irrelevant remarks, just copy and paste the following:

1. Do you read books?
2. How many books have you read?
3. How many books regarding Mormonism have you read?
4. Have you read the Book of Mormon?
5. Please list all the books you've read regarding Mormonism ( please list by categories as follows : apologetics, contra, historical, insane ramblings)the Book of Mormon, any books written BY Mormons in the last 10 years.
6. How many posts have you read regarding Mormonism?
7. How many posts have you read by Mormons?
8. How many Mormon related boards do you post on?
9. Name all the LDS posters with whom you've interacted over the last ten years.
10. Would you like a drink, too?

"There is nothing so terrible as ignorance in action." - Goethe

No kidding.
Last edited by Google Feedfetcher on Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Ray A

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Ray A »

Jersey Girl wrote:
Here Ray,

I'll make this simple for you. Whenever you feel the urge to reply to marg or others with off topic and irrelevant remarks, just copy and paste the following:

1. Do you read books?
2. How many books have you read?
3. How many books regarding Mormonism have you read?
4. Have you read the Book of Mormon?
5. Please list all the books you've read regarding Mormonism ( please list by categories as follows : apologetics, contra, historical, insane ramblings)the Book of Mormon, any books written BY Mormons in the last 10 years.
6. How many posts have you read regarding Mormonism?
7. How many posts have you read by Mormons?
8. How many Mormon related boards do you post on?
9. Name all the LDS posters with whom you've interacted over the last ten years.
10. Would you like a drink, too?


That, unfotunately is marg's ploy! In this case.

You still have not answered my question: Have you read Who Really Wrote The Book of Mormon?.

Now put your hand on your Bible, and answer my question, or you're nothing but a barrell of hot air!
_marg

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _marg »

Ray A wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
How about put yourself to a test and shut the f*** up?


So once again, please note. This is the genius behind calling marg to moderate the Spalding thread, and what does she have to say?

Shut the f*** up!

Two. peas. in. a. pod.

Dictators. Don't challenge Spalding - Shut up!!


No problem if you actually challenged the S/R theory...but you've never done that. The extent that you've added is along the lines of 'if Spalding's theory is true that means all the Book of Mormon witnesses would be liars and they couldn't be liars' and 'I'm unimpressed with the S/R theory.' You have yet to actually discussion it with any sort of intellectual critical evaluation, and any sort of knowledge that showed you knew factual information and could actually critically evaluate it.

What a stupid comment of yours in the recent post to Bryan. You obviously have no idea how stupid this is ..you ask: "Do you know that this conspiracy occurred? Or do you just think so. It's just another theory about how the Book of Mormon was written, with no slam dunks"

Do you understand what inductive reasoning is Ray? Do you understand that just because one doesn't have conclusive evidence a very strong case can be made?

Tell me Ray, what do you KNOW about how the Book of Mormon was written. If there is no conclusive evidence, is everyone supposed to throw up their hands and not theorize about it?

Your question which you think is important is so friggin stupid and a reflection of the depth of your thinking on this matter.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Ray A wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
Here Ray,

I'll make this simple for you. Whenever you feel the urge to reply to marg or others with off topic and irrelevant remarks, just copy and paste the following:

1. Do you read books?
2. How many books have you read?
3. How many books regarding Mormonism have you read?
4. Have you read the Book of Mormon?
5. Please list all the books you've read regarding Mormonism ( please list by categories as follows : apologetics, contra, historical, insane ramblings)the Book of Mormon, any books written BY Mormons in the last 10 years.
6. How many posts have you read regarding Mormonism?
7. How many posts have you read by Mormons?
8. How many Mormon related boards do you post on?
9. Name all the LDS posters with whom you've interacted over the last ten years.
10. Would you like a drink, too?


That, unfotunately is marg's ploy! In this case.

You still have not answered my question: Have you read Who Really Wrote The Book of Mormon?.

Now put your hand on your Bible, and answer my question, or you're nothing but a barrell of hot air!


Put your hand on your glass (or can) and get a new schtick.

Image
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_marg

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _marg »

Your turn Ray, please answer honestly, what have you read on critical thinking. Please list those for me.
_Ray A

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Ray A »

marg wrote:What a stupid comment of yours in the recent post to Bryan.


Who is Bryan?

marg wrote:Do you understand what inductive reasoning is Ray? Do you understand that just because one doesn't have conclusive evidence a very strong case can be made?


While ignoring firsthand witnesses. Yeah, I get it. Go for the conspiracy theory before firsthand witnesses, because you just don't like Mormonism. Makes perfect sense. Especially for you, marg.

marg wrote:Tell me Ray, what do you KNOW about how the Book of Mormon was written. If there is no conclusive evidence, is everyone not supposed to figure out the best fit theory, evaluate it on it's strength.

It was such a stupid question Ray.


It's not a stupid question at all. Did you read what Brent said? He is, as I am, open to plausible ideas, not ones that were discredited in the 19th century, then again, and again, in the 20th century, even by non-Mormon scholars!

You still haven't answered my question: Have you read Who Really Wrote The Book of Mormon?, cover to cover.
_Ray A

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Ray A »

So now we know the answer because of their failure to be forthright:

Neither Jersey nor marg have read Who Really Wrote The Book of Mormon?.

Wonders never cease!!
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Ray A wrote:So now we know the answer because of their failure to be forthright:

Neither Jersey nor marg have read Who Really Wrote The Book of Mormon?.

Wonders never cease!!


Do you understand the time investment I make to search up just the right image to symbolize your posts? I'm afraid you're borderline taking advantage of me at this point.


Image
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_marg

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _marg »

Ray A wrote:
marg wrote:What a stupid comment of yours in the recent post to Bryan.


Who is Bryan?


Since I quoted your address to him it's obvious. I'm sure you can appreciate spelling errors or maybe that's too difficult for you as well.

marg wrote:Do you understand what inductive reasoning is Ray? Do you understand that just because one doesn't have conclusive evidence a very strong case can be made?


While ignoring firsthand witnesses. Yeah, I get it. Go for the conspiracy theory before firsthand witnesses, because you just don't like Mormonism. Makes perfect sense. Especially for you, marg.


No you don't get it at all Ray. What is inductive reasoning? Explain it to me.

marg wrote:Tell me Ray, what do you KNOW about how the Book of Mormon was written. If there is no conclusive evidence, is everyone not supposed to figure out the best fit theory, evaluate it on it's strength.

It was such a stupid question Ray.


It's not a stupid question at all. Did you read what Brent said? He is, as I am, open to plausible ideas, not ones that were discredited in the 19th century, then again, and again, in the 20th century, even by non-Mormon scholars!


It is a stupid, stupid, stupid question. Tell me which theory has conclusive evidence Ray?

You still haven't answered my question: Have you read Who Really Wrote The Book of Mormon?, cover to cover.


Yes I answered the question, go back and read my response. If that's too much for you the short answer is yes.
Post Reply