Buffalo wrote:
You couldn't have demonstrated my point more clearly.
Nor could you mine.
Buffalo wrote:
You couldn't have demonstrated my point more clearly.
Hoops wrote:Buffalo wrote:
You couldn't have demonstrated my point more clearly.
Nor could you mine.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
at someone who would actually want to discuss something.Buffalo wrote:You fired the first shot...
harmony wrote:Today I think there is very little that is actually art, and a whole lot that masquerades as art. And it was like that anciently too.
Quasimodo wrote: Art is something that speaks to your soul without reference.
Buffalo wrote:
You fired the first shot...
at someone who would actually want to discuss something.Hoops wrote:
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
Hoops wrote:Quasimodo wrote: Art is something that speaks to your soul without reference.
Explain.
But it does have a reference to reality. It references our shared experience with music at least, and it references our manufactured association with the music. We share the ability to do this.I'll try again. A great piece of music can move most people emotionally. It has no reference to any reality.
Here's what I think. When we have those experiences, we are recognizing something outside ourselves, the unique compilation that is the human being. We are recognizing the artists attempt to reach out to us, to expand us, to have us participate with him/her in what he sees/hears/feels/.It touches us in an inexplicable way. A stunning visual experience can do the same (Grand Canyon? Moonlight on snow capped mountains?) I have no explanation of that feeling. Does anyone?.
Yep. But where does this motivation come from? How does this help any of us in any material way?It does not represent reality at all. Anyone could take a photograph that gave a more realistic image than this. Vincent was not trying to show what his eyes saw. He was trying to show what his heart saw. His soul.
It's excellent.Maybe this is still a poor explanation.
It is isn't it? Fortunately, we have words to describe music, and music to describe words.It's hard to use words to describe what I mean.