Which statement is true?

[_ldsfaqs]

MeDotOrg..... Highly recommend you start educating yourself starting with this video, abusing yourself of the liberal propaganda lie that the "parties switched".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3LqPedoxSk

Further, no one has ever said that Democrats weren't also "conservative" back in history, in fact, we've said the opposite. What we have said is that BOTH Republicans AND Democrats as a whole were mostly conservative historically. However, Democrats WERE still liberals, because that's how they differed from Republicans, who were FULL Conservatives.

Even today still, most Democrats are actually more conservative than they are liberal, they just don't know they are swallowing liberal propaganda, that communists/socialists have fully taken the party over, covering who they are by "partially" trying to sound somewhat conservative when they aren't in any form conservative, in other words telling people what they want to hear rather than who they actually are and are doing.

You calling Maddox a "conservative" quoting the Wikipedia article is simply stupid, because ALL Democrat's were more conservative in those days, and even more importantly, if you look at his actions, views, and history, they are clearly much more liberal, and can't at all be classified as conservative. You even further ignore that there is a difference between being conservative "socially" and being conservative in politically and ideologically. The guy was a conservative socially in some ways, but liberal in basically everything else. Stop cherry picking history.

Maddox according to his record and views in VERY FEW ways could be classified as conservative. Thus, learn to judge things according to the FULL FACTS and Truth, rather than cherry picking a word as if that tells the actual truth of a thing. But what's new? You people do the same to Mormonism.

[_Drifting]

MeDotOrg..... Highly recommend you start educating yourself starting with this video, abusing yourself of the liberal propaganda lie that the "parties switched".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3LqPedoxSk

Further, no one has ever said that Democrats weren't also "conservative" back in history, in fact, we've said the opposite. What we have said is that BOTH Republicans AND Democrats as a whole were mostly conservative historically. However, Democrats WERE still liberals, because that's how they differed from Republicans, who were FULL Conservatives.

Even today still, most Democrats are actually more conservative than they are liberal, they just don't know they are swallowing liberal propaganda, that communists/socialists have fully taken the party over, covering who they are by "partially" trying to sound somewhat conservative when they aren't in any form conservative, in other words telling people what they want to hear rather than who they actually are and are doing.

You calling Maddox a "conservative" quoting the Wikipedia article is simply stupid, because ALL Democrat's were more conservative in those days, and even more importantly, if you look at his actions, views, and history, they are clearly much more liberal, and can't at all be classified as conservative. You even further ignore that there is a difference between being conservative "socially" and being conservative in politically and ideologically. The guy was a conservative socially in some ways, but liberal in basically everything else. Stop cherry picking history.

Maddox according to his record and views in VERY FEW ways could be classified as conservative. Thus, learn to judge things according to the FULL FACTS and Truth, rather than cherry picking a word as if that tells the actual truth of a thing. But what's new? You people do the same to Mormonism.

Who is the 'we' on whose behalf you claim to be speaking?

Who is the 'you people' to whom you state you are addressing?