Bill Clinton's speech was magnificent

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Bill Clinton's speech was magnificent

Post by _EAllusion »

I guess I'd like to point out again that Brackite's view of the president as an ultrapowerful economy wizard, in addition to being inaccurate, is a terribly unconservative notion.
_Bond James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 2690
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:21 pm

Re: Bill Clinton's speech was magnificent

Post by _Bond James Bond »

Brackite wrote:The Unemployment rate was a lot lower during Bill Clinton’s fourth year in office than it is now when he ran for re-election.

1996 - Jan. 5.6% Feb. 5.5% Mar. 5.5% Apr. 5.6% May 5.6% June 5.3% July 5.5% Aug 5.1% Sept. 5.2% Oct. 5.2%.


The Unemployment rate was also lower during George W. H. Bush's fourth year in office than it is now when he ran for re-election.

1992 - Jan. 7.3% Feb. 7.4% Mar. 7.4% Apr. 7.4% May 7.6% June 7.8% July 7.7% Aug. 7.6% Sept.7.6% Oct. 7.3%.


George W. H. Bush ended up losing his re-election bid mainly because of the semi-bad economy back then. Why should Barack Obama get re-elected this year when the economy is worse now than it was back in 1992?

http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-0 ... falls.html


What power does the President have over the economy besides the bully pulpit and the ability to sign bills?
Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded.-charity 3/7/07

MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
_krose
_Emeritus
Posts: 2555
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm

Re: Bill Clinton's speech was magnificent

Post by _krose »

Brackite wrote:Why should Barack Obama get re-elected this year when the economy is worse now than it was back in 1992?

Well, how about one -- no, two -- very good reasons: Romney and Ryan. Ewww.
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
Post Reply