In today's example of deliberately missing the point, Yahoo Bot says that this thread is silly, when its explicit point is to demonstrate the stupidity of Pahoran's ongoing assertions about a clear case of actionable defamation. Since Yahoo Bot bails out nobody, though, I am glad to know that he will not continue attempting to derail this thread.
Nobody's gonna sue anybody. Least of all Dr. Peterson.
Scratch is a dear fiend to most people. We should celebrate his fiendship. After all, it got rid of Liz.
As a bonus to our lesson in deliberately missing the point, Yahoo Bot will make irrelevant observations that have nothing to do with the validity of Pahoran's assertions, which are the subject of the OP.
Yahoo Bot wrote:Let's not goad Pahoran into proving the obvious.
Smugly and continually begging the question while never engaging the issue. Spoken like a true apologist, Yahoo Bot.
You sure are showing a thing or two to those hordes of gay Mormons who persecute you.
And we all knew from the second I posted this thread that attempting to goad Pahoran into providing support for any of his assertions about anything is a non-starter, anyway.
[deleted] will not respond, he can not respond. He ticks tail everytime he is called on his stupidity.
[deleted] obviously has not read BOB Jones University v. US - light reading on history of taxes and tax exemptions, which ends with the US Supreme Court upholding the taxation of a religious p
P=234131]Another time DCP threatened lawsuits[/url]
Posters here should understand that, if I'm obliged to defend myself, everything and everybody connected with this board is potentially liable to factor into the ensuing litigation.
For that, you have my apologies in advance. I wish none of you (including GoodK) any ill, but I will vigorously defend myself. Moreover, pending my attorneys' advice (of course), I lean strongly toward filing a countersuit in order to recover any and all legal expenses and, in the form of substantial punitive damages, to discourage further baseless lawsuits against me.
This is not a joke.
I feel that I owe everybody here a warning, so that they're not caught by surprise when and if they're dragged into this situation. Again, I regret it.
It would seem that the poster using the protective online handle 'Pahoran' has taken the latter option, at least as far as this thread is concerned...
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.” Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric
"One, two, three...let's go shopping!" Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
3sheets2thewind wrote:[Deleted] will not respond, he can not respond. He ticks tail everytime he is called on his stupidity.
[Deleted] obviously has not read BOB Jones University v. US - light reading on history of taxes and tax exemptions, which ends with the US Supreme Court upholding the taxation of a religious p
P=234131]Another time DCP threatened lawsuits[/url]
Posters here should understand that, if I'm obliged to defend myself, everything and everybody connected with this board is potentially liable to factor into the ensuing litigation.
For that, you have my apologies in advance. I wish none of you (including GoodK) any ill, but I will vigorously defend myself. Moreover, pending my attorneys' advice (of course), I lean strongly toward filing a countersuit in order to recover any and all legal expenses and, in the form of substantial punitive damages, to discourage further baseless lawsuits against me.
This is not a joke.
I feel that I owe everybody here a warning, so that they're not caught by surprise when and if they're dragged into this situation. Again, I regret it.
The link does not work. Would you kindly fix it when you have time? I don't recall this particular DCP episode and would like to see the context. Thanks.
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."
DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
Umm; Peterson is only threatening a defense and a countersuit against Eric. That isn't really a threat of suing anybody.
I can see why you would put on your tap dancing shoes.
He warned the entire board that everyone here "is potentially liable to factor into the ensuing litigation"
either way, [deleted] has tucked his tail, because in his predictable "uber alles DCP" [deleted] has let his mouth write check that his intellect can not cash. Please refrain from using Pahoran's in real life name. Further incidents will require correction action including the possibility of suspension.